Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Strategic error in Mass.? Is it really liberal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:21 PM
Original message
Strategic error in Mass.? Is it really liberal?
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 07:24 PM by wilt the stilt
I stared thinking about Mass. and trying to think of any women governors, women representatives or women senators from Mass. and I couldn't come up with any. So, I used the Google and this is what I found.

Massachusetts has only elected three Lieutenant Governors:

* Evelyn Murphy (Democrat) 1987-1990
* Jane Swift (Republican) 1999-2001
* Kerry Healey (Republican) 2003-2006

Massachusetts has never elected a woman to the United States Senate and has only elected three women to the United States House of Representatives:

* Edith Nourse Rogers (Republican) 1925-1960
* Louise Day Hicks (Democrat) 1971-1973
* Margaret M. Heckler (Republican) 1967-1983


In 2001, Massachusetts ranked 19th out of the fifty states in percentage of women serving in the state legislature (Center for American Women and Politics).

For all the great talk of how liberal Mass. is it's really not true? I work with a Texan and he told me this story just the other day. He moved there with his wife and all the men asked him where he found a women like that and he said you have to bring them from Texas. A keen insight that Massachusetts people don't really like "Northern Women".
This reminds of when I was growing up and the Celtics always had trouble selling out for Bill Russell's teams but as soon as they got Bird and a white dominated they were loved. Up until The 80's Celtics the Celtics were the red headed stepchild of sports in Boston.

Don't forget the busing riots of the 70's.

Perhaps Coakley was fighting an uphill unwinnable battle of provincialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Geek_Girl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm also kind of wondering if that came into play
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. For all the points you're making, and they are good points,
We have to also acknowledge that Martha Coakley did not run a good campaign and made some major gaffes. She showed herself to be very disconnected from the local culture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rox63 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. We also elected Nikki Tsongas to the US House
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 07:30 PM by rox63
But overall, MA has a poor record of electing women.

That said, Coakley ran an awful campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Then I guess Alaska is liberal as all get-out.
Edited on Wed Jan-20-10 07:33 PM by lumberjack_jeff
Don't use "women" as a proxy for "liberal"

edited to add:
I don't think any place is inherently liberal. People appreciate candidates who demonstrate empathy, leadership, vision and principles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raspberry Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. Well . . .
. . . don't forget that half of Massachusetts Senate seats were tied up by one family for over half a century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
6. My ex was ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. If it were really that competitive in Mass
How come she ran like she thought there was not a prayer in hell she'd lose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grand Taurean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is a mean undertone of racism/sexism.
in our society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. MA voted for Ronnie Raygun twice...
Don't take any state for granted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timeforpeace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. We lost, ergo it's not liberal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wilt the stilt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. How about the race issue
and the Celtics. I was around at the time and the Celtics were hardly loved and I think the Texas thing is interesting. I live in the south and the women are very different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chelsea0011 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
11. Louise Day Hicks.......Jeesh. Thanks for the reminder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Retrograde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jan-20-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. Demogratic leaning does not mean liberal
Massachusetts was once a bastion of blue-collar workers, with a high proportion of Catholics, two groups which in the past tended to vote for Democrats. But those were also the demographics that Reagan appealed to, and times have changed from the days when unions and the churches told people who to vote for (and could be expected to be listened to). They can also be very conservative groups, especially when they feel threatened. Listening to my blue-collar relatives in western New York, there's a widespread feeling that there's really nothing to choose from between the two parties and they might as well go with the devil they don't know yet. I think that's a major reason why Obama did so well: he seemed to listen. The same with Hillary Clinton: she made an effort to understand the people she was going to serve.

I also think Democrats have gotten complacent in many areas (in my district the GOP half-heartedly fields candidates every two years, but there's little active campaigning).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:11 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC