Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Email From a Staffer

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:28 AM
Original message
Email From a Staffer
"I certainly wouldn't want to indicate I have any unique insight on how everyone feels around this place but I thought you might be interested in how one Senate staffer is feeling.
My background is like probably the majority of staffers I know. I came to DC, from a far superior climate and quality of life, because I wanted to save the world. I arrived, and took a job in the House, at what I still view as the nadir of Congress - in 1996. Republicans had recently taken over Congress and had 230 seats in the House and 52 in the Senate. Democrats were in a state of shock and we watched (because that was essentially all we could do) in horror as they systematically went after nearly every institution of civil governance culminating in nearly removing the President from office via an entirely trumped-up charge. They had destroyed the Democrats in 1994 because they simply couldn't deliver - the BTU tax went down, health care went down, and finally the Crime Bill failed because it had such laughably wacky ideas as "midnight basketball" as a crime prevention measure (something with is widely approved of today and is completely noncontroversial). As a young LA, it was amazingly dispiriting. Literally nothing we proposed could get passed - we couldn't even get votes. Every bill came to the floor under a closed rule so we couldn't propose amendments and our Senate colleagues faced a full amendment tree on every bill such that unless they had Republican patron they couldn't get votes either. Kennedy fought like hell for things like minimum wage and sometimes could arm-wrestle a procedural vote win out of them but things would just die in the hands of the Hammer in the House. Eventually, my boss got fed up and retired and I went over to the Administration where I thought I might be able to get more accomplished."

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/01/relieved.php#more?ref=fpblg


The staffer offers some insight into the mood today. The one thing I didn't expect to hear was "relief."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hope people read the entire e-mail
We all deserve better than this. The question is, however: How do we get it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. In my post below I excerpt the passages that really struck me the hardest.
Even people who don't go to TPM to read the whole email should at least scroll down and read those excerpts in my post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Great article, but I still don't know what you do about obstructionist republicans
and enabling centrist democrats.

I'm really disheartened right now. It's tough to imagine really progressive legislation happening in the next 10 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. you have leadership that takes them behind the curtain -dems- and
threaten their very existence like LBJ did when he got it done, like Sam Rayburn did, like Harry Truman did. You grow a pair, you get a spine, you kick ass and you get it done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. And, to be honest, the way that Tom "The Hammer" Delay did.
That's how he got his nickname--by successfully strong-arming recalcitrant Republican members of the House. They know how to do it--but they don't want to, because it might annoy their corporate paymasters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Ding ding ding ding
""because it might annoy their corporate paymasters.""
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cant trust em Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I think that was a lot easier 50 years ago with a much less diverse country
We're a lot more ideologically divided now than we were at that time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JHB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. You get out the legbreakers.
(figuratively speaking, though sometimes it can be useful to make them wonder)

What to do about obstructionist Republicans? Make an issue out of it! Republicans don't hesitate to call Democrats "obstuctionist" for merely trying to ask pointed questions to nominees.

Sauce for the goose(steppers). Every Dem who gets face time on television should be bringing this up. Point out the contradiction of them trying to show how "independent" they are by toeing the party line at Soviet-grade levels of conformity.

Have a weekly (daily when it's important) feature: "Lockstep Watch" (complete with "the Internationale" and Soviet troops goose-stepping through Red Square on old May Day parade filems), tracking how completely locked together congressional Republican voting is. Glenn Greenwald compiled a list of this sort two years ago. Revive it and run with it.

It's not a magic pill to solve all our problems, but if you kick them in the teeth over their sniveling conformity you will knock some of them out of the herd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. no wonder they have reacted the way they have and Axelrod admires Brown while Obama wants to wait
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 02:02 AM by saracat
to seat Brown to vote on HCR. BTW, what was the all fire hurry before the election then? Remember, there was an act of the Mass leg to seat Ted's sucessor so they could pass HCR? Times have changed. but then,. Obama also once said any bill he signed must contain a Public Option. Now it doesn't have to contain anything!and apparently it doesn't even have to pass!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 02:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. Here's the money quote
The worst is that I can't help but feel like the main emotion people in the caucus are feeling is relief at this turn of events. Now they have a ready excuse for not getting anything done. While I always thought we had the better ideas but the weaker messaging, it feels like somewhere along the line Members internalized a belief that we actually have weaker ideas. They're afraid to actually implement them and face the judgement of the voters. That's the scariest dynamic and what makes me think this will all come crashing down around us in November.


Have you ever read anything as pathetic as this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nosmokes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 03:55 AM
Response to Original message
9. nail, meet hammer.
thanks for the post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cilla4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. Can't believe, don't accept
that there aren't things the executive CAN do; not presently familiar enough with Constitution to know! But Obama and his team and the majority dems in Congress are going to have to figure out what they CAN do, given the circumstances

oh crap...just heard s. ct. struck down limits on corp contributions to elections...maybe I should rethink the post.

Then there is Edwards. No doubt - bad week for Dems!

Time for revolution...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC