Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Here it is: the late Senator Ted Kennedy's Medicare for All Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:11 AM
Original message
Here it is: the late Senator Ted Kennedy's Medicare for All Act
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 05:12 AM by Douglas Carpenter


Official summary - Senate bill 2229 (2006):



Medicare for All Act - Amends the Social Security Act to add a new title XXII (Medicare for All) under which: (1) each eligible individual is entitled to benefits which include the full range and scope of benefits available under the original fee-for-service program under parts A (Hospital Insurance) and B (Supplementary Medical Insurance) of title XVIII (Medicare), with parity in coverage of mental health benefits, subject to appropriate cost sharing; (2) each enrollee is free to choose his or her own doctor and private health plan; and (3) benefits are not less than the benefits offered to Members of Congress and Federal employees under FEHBP (Federal Employees Health Benefits Program).
Establishes the Medicare for All Trust Fund.

Amends the Internal Revenue Code to impose: (1) on the income of every individual a tax equal to 1.7% of wages received; (2) on every employer an excise tax equal to 7% of the wages paid to each employee; and (3) on the self-employment income of every individual, a tax equal to the applicable percentage of the self-employment income for such taxable year.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/8/26/772564/-Kennedys-Medicare-for-All-act



the full text of the late Senator Ted Kennedy's Medicare for All bill:

Text of S. 2229 <109th>: Medicare for All Act bill:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s109-2229




/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. Also known as HR.676 in the House companion version.
They could have done this thing right the first time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Still can be done by splitting the Bill and Reconciliation
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 05:32 AM by leveymg
Medicare for All can be part of HCR by simple majorities (51/218), if we get our act together and demand it from Obama and Congress. Don't settle for anything less.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
3. If President Obama made Medicare for All into a moral cause to fight for
And relentlessly emphasized the reasonableness and moral imperative of Medicare for All - the public would almost certainly rally behind him and it would be very hard to campaign against - given the bipartisan overwhelming popularity of Medicare.

At the very, very least, we could end up with a very strong public option open to everyone who wants it.

Unfortunately, single-payer of any kind was taken off the table from day one and now we don't even have a weak public option. We have a bill loaded with mandates that are the insurance industries dream, a plan that most Americans don't want.

Last year the battle cry was, "health care for all!" now the battle cry is "okay, we admit that its not a very good bill. But, its better than nothing". Not exactly a winning campaign slogan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. President Obama made a strategic choice to leave it to Congress
Remember the Clintons hashed out a plan and then told Congress what to do. (more or less). Congress did not take kindly to being robbed of the opportunity to bloviate for the folks back home and use the legislation as a way to enrich their bank accounts and jockey for position. (aka screw America first)

President Obama decide to do the opposite and stay behind the scenes so Congress can have all the credit. Well that did not work out so well because he's getting all the "blame" anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. An unrealized dream, unfortunately
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is, of course, what the Country deperately needs...
Not all the reach arounds to the insurance industry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 08:42 AM
Response to Original message
7. This is what we need.


k and r



:hi:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
8. More Hope ...
Senator Kennedy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
9. delete dupe
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 11:42 AM by GeorgeGist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. if the Democrats ran on this or at the very least having the option
to choose Medicare or private insurance, I cannot help but think the Republicans would have a lot of trouble campaigning against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-22-10 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. They could actually do that through reconciliation, but they won't.
It couldn't be permanent through reconciliation, but all you need to do is look at the legislation Bush passed via reconciliation, including medicare cuts/"reform", to see that it totally could be done.

Democrats are cowards and they don't play for our team, our team being the team of working American families and the underprivileged.

The sooner we accept this, the sooner we could go about fixing this party.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC