Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coakley aides paint portrait of missteps on campaign trail

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 08:25 AM
Original message
Coakley aides paint portrait of missteps on campaign trail

By Matt Viser
Globe Staff / January 21, 2010

Democrats were feeling lots of things yesterday, none of them very good, as they woke up to a new political reality: They had lost the Senate election, given up a seat they had owned for six decades, and were forced to accept that a Republican, Scott Brown, is headed to Washington, D.C.

What went wrong? A lot, according to a portrait of Democrat Martha Coakley’s campaign painted by people who either closely observed it or were involved in some fashion.

They described a campaign that was too sure of its own success, that waited too long to call in the cavalry, that made key missteps, including focusing on abortion at the expense of the economy, and that did little to court voters in the communities that led Governor Deval Patrick and President Obama to huge victories.

<snip>


The lapses were particularly noticeable in minority communities, traditionally bastions of Democratic votes, which did not turn out in high numbers Tuesday.

“She came in late, at the last minute, and people were frustrated,’’ said one Democratic activist, who, like most people interviewed, agreed to talk without being named. “They’re not happy with that kind of campaigning. If you get in there early, people feel respected.’’

In addition, people familiar with the campaign say, Coakley aides made no concerted effort to involve her three primary rivals or their networks and included the Kennedy family in the campaign only after the Kennedys themselves pushed the issue.

<snip>

Some people involved in the campaign said Coakley did not appear to have a clear sense of who her constituency was, while Brown clearly identified his voters, including many independents and even Democrats who chafed at the party’s policies in Washington. He campaigned outside Fenway Park and Bruins hockey games and surrounded himself with everyman sports heroes such as Curt Schilling and Doug Flutie.

By many accounts, the Coakley campaign lost the television ad war, too. Brown had put up two ads, both of which drew attention, before Coakley took out her first on Jan. 6, less than two weeks before the election.

<snip>

http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2010/01/21/coakley_aides_paint_portrait_of_missteps_on_campaign_trail/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Only if they learn from their mistakes will it mean anything.
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 08:46 AM by TheCowsCameHome
I still can't believe that someone actually planned such a strategy in campaign like hers.

edit: grammar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 08:36 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. taking for granted that the electorate would automatically
vote for her was massively stupid and arrogant. No surprise at all that the minority communities she dissed, didn't turn out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
3. Anyone with campaign savvy would not have run this type of campaign.
When you have the Kennedy people at your disposal you don't turn them down.

They waited 2 weeks before the election before airing any ads? That is ludicrous.

Coakley must really think she was a superstar and thought she won her election on her own. I would bet that she won because of coat-tails mainly from Senator Kennedy and with the help of the Governor's campaign strategy. Yes, she had help from her nanny prosecution but Kennedy received 300,000 more votes than she did for her race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. IMO- she subconsciously didn't want to win....nobody would
sabotage their chances if they really wanted to win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. That seems to be the reality based explanation. Although I did don my tinfoil hat last night
I'm afraid to actually start a thread on that crazy idea.

Although other DU'ers have come up with similar concepts about other politicians who are so utterly inept.

But you could probably guess what my conspiracy theory was. :tinfoilhat:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. My tinfoil hat theory- Coakley was bought off. How else to explain such an extreme case
of political malfeasance?

Yeah, I know. That's silly.

But DAMN SKIPPY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. How did she win the primary with such bad campaign skills? Was it
a question of primary turnout or did she do a better job then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. very low turnout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Thanks, That's too bad. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. from a post on DKos, Western Mass Democrats supported her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. yes. she's from N. Adams. It's the most sparsely populated part of the state
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC