Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Well, well, well, looky looky who filed a brief in the SCOTUS case

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 10:59 AM
Original message
Well, well, well, looky looky who filed a brief in the SCOTUS case
For instance, the United States Chamber of Commerce, which spent $36 million on ads and get-out-the-vote activities in 2008, pledged this week to organize the largest, most aggressive election campaign in its history targeting congressional Democrats who support Obama administration proposals to overhaul health insurance and the financial system and limit carbon emissions.

The chamber, as well as the GOP-aligned National Rifle Association, filed briefs in the case supporting the conservative non-profit group challenging the rules, though so did the American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations or AFL-CIO. The Democratic National Committee, however, in a brief filed by then-DNC general counsel Bob Bauer, who has since been tapped as White House general counsel, argued in favor of keeping the rules, asserting that opening the door to more corporate spending in elections would discourage the types of small donors who he contends helped power Obama to victory in 2008.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/31786_Page2.html#ixzz0dGMEKe2r


The Chamber and its child, the DLC. And you wonder why Harold Ford, corporate lackey carpetbagger, is running with confidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. -puke-
There goes the last ray of hope that we will not become a Fascist Corporatocracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. of course!
right on cue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brendan120678 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. And I see that the AFL-CIO supported the conservative position as well.
Not too surprised - unions have just as much to gain by donating big bucks to a campaign as corporations do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. the problem is that they have no where near
the funds that corps do and their membership has been diminishing for years. I hardly expect them to see any advantage in trying to compete in buying policy and politicians. so yeah, their position seems pretty short sighted to me.....if the interests of their leaders are really with their membership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. At least Unions fight on behalf of the employees they represent.
The same can NOT be said for corporate america who have done everything in their power to squash unions and hold the working class down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hughee99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
4. Self delete. n/t
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 11:07 AM by hughee99
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. I am shocked! SHOCKED!
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. Got news for Rahm and the DLC types
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 11:12 AM by lapfog_1
Used to be that all you had to do to win as a Democrat was have a "D" after your name, buy as much ad space as possible and have your name in front of mostly asleep voters 24 x 7, and go negative on your opponent.

That was conventional wisdom right up until 2006 / 2008.

Now, with the economy in the tank, years of Reaganomics killing our jobs with the help of WTO and NAFTA and all the other TLA treaties and agreements that gave our jobs away, people are PAYING MORE ATTENTION, especially the base of the Democratic party.

The election of Brown where he picked up significant amount of former Obama voters (who, in the polling, said that the health care bill was a disaster and "didn't go far enough") was the shot across bow. President Obama needs to change course, fire Rahm and Geitner, scrap the current Senate bill, rewrite the health care bill and break it into half dozen bills, starting with the "no pre-existing condition" ban on insurance companies. Dare the repukes to oppose it and filibuster. Pass it. Then do the next one. And, finally, pass the expansion of Medicare to 55 and over via reconciliation.

No more side deals with Nelson or Lieberman.

Quit chasing corporate dollars. Those dollars are not as important as they were a few years ago.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. That doesn't make sense

Brown picked up Obama voters who didn't think the bill went far enough"?

So they voted for a guy who said he would kill it? No more HCR? I don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lapfog_1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Neither did Chris Matthews when he interviewed
Howard Dean yesterday.

It was a PROTEST vote.

Not going to vote for a Democrat until they start doing what we want them to do. What they said they would do in their campaigns.

It was a protest against Obama and the DLC dems. Coakley was just at the wrong place at the wrong time (and she ran a perfectly awful campaign).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bbgrunt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. wrong place....nt
Edited on Thu Jan-21-10 12:59 PM by bbgrunt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC