Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CA-Sen: Boxer With Solid Leads But Campbell Asserts Himself; SSP Moves to Likely D

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:11 PM
Original message
CA-Sen: Boxer With Solid Leads But Campbell Asserts Himself; SSP Moves to Likely D
Field Poll (pdf) (1/5-17, likely voters, 9/18-10/6 in parentheses):

Tom Campbell (R): 30 (NA)
Carly Fiorina (R): 25 (21)
Chuck DeVore (R): 6 (20)
Undecided: 39 (59)
(MoE: ±7.1%)

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 48 (NA)
Tom Campbell (R): 38 (NA)
Undecided: 14 (NA)

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 50 (49)
Carly Fiorina (R): 35 (35)
Undecided: 15 (16)

Barbara Boxer (D-inc): 51 (50)
Chuck DeVore (R): 34 (33)
Undecided: 15 (17)
(MoE: ±3.3%)

The Field Poll (it's become kind of cliched to refer to them as the "gold standard" for California pollsters, but their reputation precedes them) checks in on the California Senate race for the first time since September, with one big change: the switchover of ex-Rep. Tom Campbell from the Governor's race to the Senate race. It looks like Campbell knew what he was doing, getting out of the GOP governor's field where he was financially outgunned (as seen today, where it's barely newsworthy that Meg Whitman just fronted herself another $20 million), and immediately moving into the lead in the GOP field.

Campbell had released an internal poll last week that showed him leading Carly Fiorina and Chuck DeVore 31-15-12, suggesting that he was eating equally into Fiorina and DeVore supporters. But the Field poll suggests that this is almost coming entirely out of DeVore's share -- initially strange since there's a sharp contrast between Campbell's Silicon Valley moderatism and DeVore's O.C. conservatism. But it makes sense when you think that much of DeVore's support was coming from the seemingly ascendant libertarian side of the party (and that social conservatives have been unusually quiet lately), and many of them are likely to embrace the socially liberal but fiscally hawkish Campbell.

As for the general, Field sees little movement in the last four months in the Boxer/Fiorina and Boxer/DeVore matchups, suggesting that Barbara Boxer hasn't seemed to sustain much personal damage from the withering of the Democratic brand. As I'd feared, though, the amiable and well-known Campbell polls noticeably better against Boxer than the others -- at ten points, not enough to start hitting the panic button, but indicating that this race will need to be carefully monitored. (Rasmussen recently showed this a closer tace than that, but, well, what else is new.) Taking into account Campbell's apparent likelihood of winning the primary and the overall national environment, that's enough for us to move this race back onto the board at "Likely Democratic."

http://www.swingstateproject.com/diary/6255/casen-boxer-with-solid-leads-but-campbell-asserts-himself-ssp-moves-to-likely-d
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It sure the fuck is.
I do NOT like how 2012 is trending at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. 2012 isn't the issue right now... but even if it was a typo, you're right.
at least in the Senate. The 2006 senate races gave us a few new seats in otherwise "red" areas... and we'll be defending far more seats than the republicans.

We likely won't lose the Senate this fall (though it is just barely in play), but if we lose half a dozen seats in Nov, the 2012 elections could easily cost us the senate if things haven't improved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Yeah, it was a typo. Meant 2010. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. That's not a solid lead.
A well known statewide incumbent regularly polling under 50% is in danger... regardless of the lead (unless the oponent is a similarly well known statwide player like a former senator or governor).

Cook has it as leans "D" and has Boxer as the 8th moth endangered Democratic seat.

OTOH, Coakley was in LESS danger just a couple weeks ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
6. it is scary, because Campbell is very moderate...moderate R's can get elected here (ro)
IF they get the nomination. The hard-core nutjobs don't like Campbell, as he is pro-choice, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-21-10 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Republicans like to put up amateurs.
Whitman and Fiorina join Schwarzenegger, Reagan, Shirley Temple, Sonny Bono, and George Murphy. None of them was worth shit.

--imm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 08:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC