Botany
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-22-10 09:39 AM
Original message |
O.K. so the SCOTUS missed in this ruling but it is not like the court doesn't |
|
Edited on Fri Jan-22-10 09:45 AM by Botany
..... have precedent in fucked up rulings. See Bush v Gore Where Scalia ruled that court would hear bush v Gore because that the counting of the vote in Florida would cause embarrassment to Bush because the media already had said he had won the election. The court's final ruling that ordered the stopping of the counting of the vote in Florida was so bad that Sandra O'Connell wrote that the case was not applicable to any past or future cases.
Yesterday's ruling is one more fuck over of the American people thanx to George W Bush because if he hadn't been installed not only would we have had no 9/11, Iraq war, Afghanistan war, poor response to Katrina, Haliburton, spying, torture, and both Roberts & Allito would never have been picked for the SCOTUS by a President Al Gore.
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, and Thomas :puke:
|
pearl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-22-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message |
1. It is Sandra Day Oconnors entire legacy |
|
Bush v Gore = Roberts, Alito Chilling.
|
Jim__
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-22-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Alito ruled? I don't think he was on the bench for Bush v Gore -n/t |
RUMMYisFROSTED
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-22-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
Botany
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-22-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
I fixed it
..... if you have seen one right wing nut ball Italian you have seen them all. :rofl:
|
spanone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-22-10 09:47 AM
Response to Original message |
4. trust me, this one is a doozy |
MiniMe
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-22-10 03:39 PM
Response to Original message |
6. I don't know about anybody else, but I would like to hear what Sandra Day O'Conner has to say |
|
about this ruling. I would be very curious.
|
Botany
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jan-22-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. she owns it .... nothing more and nothing less |
|
Much like she owns 9/11 & the Iraq war. I read something about 1/2 a year ago she is worried about her place in history as per bush v Gore. My thoughts were don't worry Sandy your career will be defined by your vote in that case. Much like most people only remember John Wilkes Booth for one thing.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 02:25 AM
Response to Original message |