Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So, are we looking forward to the next abortion rights case to be decided by SCOTUS?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:12 PM
Original message
So, are we looking forward to the next abortion rights case to be decided by SCOTUS?
And the rights of gays,

and the right to teach creationism in public schools,

and the right for Christians to implant religion into government decisions,

and the illegality of adult material,

and the the illegality to sell, possess or use birth control,

and the illegality of certain forms of sexual activities within your bedroom,

and the Miranda rights, and the right to privacy, etc. etc. etc.


If one of the conservative judges doesn't drop dead soon we are in for one hell of a century.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's why we need to start an investigation into their ties with subversive elements
Edited on Sat Jan-23-10 03:33 PM by anonymous171
They need to be scared into submission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newtothegame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 'subversive elements?' that is creepy; didn't know this was 1984. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Are you saying that corporate influence is not subversive? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 04:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Right after the 2000 election decision, there should have
been an investigation into their finances. I think they benefitted in their pockets for that one, as well as they probably are now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-23-10 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. They wouldn't dare
get rid of all their wedge issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC