Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conyers introduces Bill to impeach District Judge.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 06:38 PM
Original message
Conyers introduces Bill to impeach District Judge.
H. Res. 1031:Impeaching G. Thomas Porteous, Jr., judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, for high crimes and misdemeanors. ( Corruption and bribery charges)

Details here:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=hr111-1031

news story here:


Judge Thomas Porteous not trustworthy, task force declares
By Bruce Alpert, Times-Picayune
January 21, 2010, 6:20PM


A House task force Thursday recommended that U.S. District Judge Thomas Porteous be impeached because of a "long-standing pattern of corrupt conduct."
The panel unanimously approved four articles of impeachment which will be considered by the House Judiciary Committee in the next week or two.

"Judge Porteous engaged in a pattern of conduct that is incompatible with the trust and confidence placed in him as a federal judge," said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee Task Force on Judicial Impeachment.

The articles accuse Porteous, who was appointed by President Bill Clinton, of seeking and taking kickbacks and other gifts, including money, trips and free meals at expensive restaurants from lawyers and a bail bond company with business before him, not disclosing his improper conduct as a state judge to the Senate during his 1994 confirmation proceedings and making false statements in a personal bankruptcy filing.

http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2010/01/judge_thomas_porteous_not_trus.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hang him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Good! We need to get some PRACTICE for the big tasks like this later!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. WOW!
This is BIG.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. This guy sued the impeachment panel...
http://www.nola.com/politics/index.ssf/2009/11/judge_thomas_porteous_sues_imp.html

Federal Judge Thomas Porteous sues impeachment panel
By The Associated Press
November 13, 2009, 1:33PM


A Louisiana federal judge sued a House impeachment task force Friday, contending the panel is making the case for his ouster by using testimony he gave under a promise of immunity.

tom-porteous.JPGThe Times-Picayune archiveU.S. district judge in N.O. facing possible impeachment U.S. District Judge G. Thomas Porteous Jr. is under investigation for alleged misconduct, including an allegation that he accepted money from lawyers involved in a trial over which he presided.

The suit, in U.S. District Court, said the House task force violated Porteous' Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. The task force used immunized testimony in witness interviews and to formulate strategy, the suit said.

There was no immediate response from the Judiciary Committee or the special counsel for the task force, Washington attorney Alan Baron.

Immunized testimony is given under a promise from authorities that the statements will not be used against the defendant.

Porteous gave immunized testimony to a judicial panel that concluded the judge's conduct might constitute grounds for impeachment. The House then formed its own task force.

The allegations against Porteous were uncovered during the FBI's Operation Wrinkled Robe, an investigation of state judges in Jefferson Parish, where Porteous served until he was appointed a federal judge in 1994.

That 5 1/2-year investigation put court-ordered wiretaps and video cameras in the parish courthouse and brought 14 convictions, including those of two state judges who were sent to federal prison. Criminal charges were not filed against Porteous.

The investigation uncovered evidence that Porteous rejected a request to step down from a case without revealing that he had a history of financial relationships with at least one attorney involved, and leaving lawyers' gifts off financial disclosure statements from 1994-2000.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Next up
The Supremes - for treason
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Oh god...couldn't they just have duel or something?
Good fine, tho.
Why didn't Clinton sue the impeachment panel, Iwonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-24-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. A duel...
:rofl:

That cracked me up!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC