S_E_Fudd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:15 PM
Original message |
Poll question: What will Congress look like after the 2010 elections? |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-25-10 12:15 PM by S_E_Fudd
|
ourbluenation
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:16 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Republican house, dem senate got a vote? Really? n/t |
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. I'm still thinking - but that is not as outrageous as it sounds |
|
Only a third of the Senate is up and these are the seats that were up in 2004. Just as 2002 led to mostly strong Democrats surviving and few new Democrats - making 2008 with Obama great. (There was already a lot of anger at ANY incumbents, but Senators like Kerry, Harkin, Durbin and Biden all were easily re-elected. To lose the Senate means Losing more than 8 (so Lieberman who I don't trust not to lose parties). (Nate Siver showed very little probabilty of that.)
In the House everyone is up and we have the bulk of the junior Congressmen because we won the last two times.
|
dgibby
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:27 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Corporate House, Corporate Senate. n/t |
apnu
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Yeah, why isn't that an option? (nt) |
S_E_Fudd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. Well that is assumed... |
Demeter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:30 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Older, But Not Wiser, and a Lot Less Hopeful |
|
and poorer. Definitely poorer, and sicker.
|
Maru Kitteh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Exxon/Mobil/Time-Warner House - GE/Goldman-Sachs/BCBS Senate |
name not needed
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |
8. It'll look like the clusterfuck of corporate influence and stupidity it was before the election |
|
But with a few new idiots.
|
S_E_Fudd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:40 PM
Response to Original message |
10. We're gonna lose seats in both houses, but neither will change hands. |
Greyhound
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:41 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Legislative, Judicial, and Executive all serving The One True Party. n/t |
S_E_Fudd
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Right now I would say we lose the House...keep the Senate with 52 seats.... |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-25-10 12:46 PM by S_E_Fudd
Think 10 seat or so majority for the Repubs in the House
Senate Dems lose NV, PA, ND, DE, AR, MA, IN...
In a wave we lose CA and NY too..
|
Kurt_and_Hunter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-25-10 12:44 PM by Kurt_and_Hunter
|
Tierra_y_Libertad
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message |
14. The same as it has for decades. An edifice to the status quo and politics-as-usual. |
|
Full of crooks, place-holders, liars, incompetents, ego-maniacs, and the rare, very rare, public servant.
|
closeupready
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-25-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message |
15. Nominally, both chambers will remain Democratic. |
|
In fact, the Senate will act Republican, the House less so, but in both cases, Democrats will lose seats.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:21 AM
Response to Original message |