Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Taking on the five rightwing SCOTUS justices the way he did was bold and risky

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:08 AM
Original message
Taking on the five rightwing SCOTUS justices the way he did was bold and risky
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 09:08 AM by scheming daemons
They *DO* have the power to make his life miserable in the next 7 years, depending on what cases are brought before them.


He deserves our support for this... and we must have his back in the next several days as the rightwing media blows this up and goes into full hissy-fit mode.


No matter what else you think of Obama's agenda, or what he's done or not done as President so far, this issue is about much more than Obama or the current politicians in office.


This is about, pardon the cliche, our grandchildren.


They either live in a "Rollerball" world or they don't.


We must rise as one to back the President on this.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. I expected four of the justices to stand and applaud.
But they're probably afraid that if they did, Clarence Thomas would put pubic hair in their coke.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Thomas wasn't there
Neither was Scalia.

I wonder if they are in ill health?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That would be a shame.
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Clarence prolly missed his afternoon nap--on the bench. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. The justices often don't attend the SOTU. Nothing unusual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #3
15. They've been in bad health since long before the were on the court
if you include mental health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatFancy55 Donating Member (20 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. Disaster plan
A few stay behind in case something terrible were to happen. I believe they also do the same with the Joint Chiefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:11 AM
Response to Original message
2.  Last night, I was damn proud of DU.
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 09:13 AM by blondeatlast
Last night, DU was about as united as I've ever seen it, sans the trolls.

We're all in the SCOTUS boat together--and I saw nothing but praise for the President regarding his calling out--again, sans the trolls.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jedicord Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. I hope the Repubs do keep hammering on it.
Even those in the red states, with unemployment so high, must have a strong dislike for corporations having so much power with our government. I'm just curious how they're going to frame it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. We already know--it apples to those "evil" unions too, so they applaud the decision.
Reality doesn't matter to the manipulators of the Republican party and they know just how to sell to the sheeple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. When injustice becomes law, resistance becomes duty!
No body meant for you to take it so personal. Do what you want. No pressure at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. The rightwingg 5 are mad with power and behaving in a destructive
and treasonous manner. It's the President's moral obligation to take them on and try and stop them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
11. The Dems blocking them from being confiormed would have been bold
Criticizing the filibuster process on Alito- rather than getting out and helping to lead it, then later on whinging in the SOTU about one of their decisions was, to those who recall their history, anything but.

Reminded me of choosing to support Lieberman in the primary against Lamont- then having Lieberman turn around two and three years later, and show his "gratitude."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
12. not much of a risk because the fascist five will be making his life miserable for 7 years anyway
you think they'd come around if he had praised them instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
14. We the people need to take our country back from the SCOTUS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #14
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Why not?
If we rise up, protest, march on Washington, Call our Senators and Representatives. Blast the media so forth.

It is called activism.

First we need a voice, someone who can lead the effort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
17. AH, the Supreme Court Rightwingers Of The United States?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hosnon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. Not really. The Court is powerful but that power is very narrow. If they reviewed
legislation at the front end (as is done in some European countries), I'd agree.

Moreover, the Court is the least political branch. None of the Justices wants to be seen as less-than-judicial to their peers (e.g., the legal community, Ive League law professors).

I hope Ginsburg and Stevens retire within the next year so Obama can go ahead and fill those spots. And if we're lucky, either Scalia or Kennedy will retire too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
20. There were several things Obama said that make me fear for his physical safety
this year. :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. I don't think you have to worry about that too much.
If he were unable to perform his duties as president, the VP would step in to perform them. If they don't like President Obama, they sure as hell don't want Joe. Especially if they're the reason he had to step up. More importantly, they know that even an assassination *attempt* would ensure the opposition party was utterly powerless for at least the next few election cycles.

If it weren't for those two reasons, I'd be concerned as well.
They're not going to risk being driven out of power for the foreseeable future.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
21. The traitorous 5 needed to be shamed in public. I applaud the President.
Honestly, I think they should be jailed. Selling our government offices to the highest bidders is really nothing less than treason. It is hands down the worst judgment of my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC