Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Time to get Pelosi to put the articles of impeachment on the floor for all 5 felonius SC judges

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:34 PM
Original message
Time to get Pelosi to put the articles of impeachment on the floor for all 5 felonius SC judges
and prepare to indict them for treason.

That's what Pelosi needs to do, and do it today.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. no, it's not. and it won't be happening. thankfully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is the Opening Post supposed to Performance Art? Sarcasm?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. based on . . . what exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not a very wise idea.
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 12:44 PM by FBaggins
Whether they deserve it or not.

The move that the public could get behind would be to start a move to correct the problem properly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. well, since they haven't committed a felony or treason, that's a really dumb idea
They made a bad decision. It sucks. But its not a felony to reach a decision that a lot of people (including four other SCOTUS justices and me) disagree with. And its not treason.

Six Justices of the SCOTUS upheld FDR's order directing the internment of Japanese Americans during WWII, including Justices Douglas and Frankfurter. SHould they have been impeached for what to many appears to be a horrifically wrong decision?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. It's just that DUers like to shake their fists and call for impeachment
since it went so well during the Bush years. They're not concerned at all where the votes in the House would come from for impeachment or then where the 67 votes for conviction would come from in the Senate. You'd reckon by now that people here would understand that impeachment does not mean removal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes, it's time
An SC ruling that opens our elections to manipulation by foreigners is blatantly treasonous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. i recommend you find a copy of the constitution and read Art III, Sec 3
"Treason" in the United States is a very narrow, very specifically defined offense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamtechus Donating Member (868 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Treason
Treason
 Treason Trea"son, n. {OE. tresun, treisun, traisoun, OF.
tra{"i}son, F. trahison, L. traditio a giving up, a
delivering up, fr. tradere to give up, betray. See Traitor,
and cf. Tradition.}

1. The offense of attempting to overthrow the government of
the state to which the offender owes allegiance, or of
betraying the state into the hands of a foreign power;
disloyalty; treachery.
{1913 Webster}

Also, impeachment doesn't require a violation of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Mistaking Webster's dictionary for the Constitution of the US -- that's wild
And no, impeachment doesn't require a violation of the law. But since precedent seems important to you, you might consider the precedent of the attempt to impeach and remove Samuel Chase -- the only time in US history where such an effort was launched against a SCOTUS Justice and the failure of which has long been regarded as having validated the concept of the independence of the Judiciary -- ie., they don't get "impeached" because the current majority in Congress happens to disagree with their decisions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cid_B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. You keep using that word...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. I hear they offer very thorough civics courses at local community colleges for adults
You may want to check it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbiegeek Donating Member (844 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. don't be a dick to our fellow dems
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 01:01 PM by barbiegeek
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Just trying to be helpful.
This person apparently has no idea how American government works. Perhaps taking a course or a quick read of the Constitution would really help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #7
19. lulz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Forget the pony. I want a unicorn!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Pelosi-Impeachment? have you not been paying attention?
Edited on Thu Jan-28-10 01:05 PM by lame54
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. If they have been having sex with their law clerks, then I am behind this 100 percent!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-28-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. don't hold your breath because it will never happen. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC