Here's the Schuster/Breitbart Yell-Off Video

[blogslut]

Courtesy of Wonkette:

http://wonkette.com/413432/shuster-and-breitbart-yell-at-each-other-for-five-minutes-hooray

[NewJeffCT]

1. can you summarize it

for those of us who can't watch video at work?

thanks

[blogslut]

3. Basically

Schuster started the interview asking Breitbart how he could'nt have known what O'Keefe was up, considering Bretbart has the young man on his payroll. Breitbart swung back that MSNBC was libelous to O'Keefe because they claimed he was arrested for wire-tapping, when the charges (which have yet to be formalized) are actually "phone tampering". And then Breitbart went on some shouting tirade about MSNBC being the shapers of all news reports on O'Keefe and some wierd stuff about MSNBC recieving Obama stimulus funds. Schuster stood his ground, pointed out Breitbart's hypocrisy...yell, yell, yell, and yell...

In the end it was a shouting match.

[WolverineDG]

5. Oh, & MSNBC is is covering up for Obama because

they got billions of stimulus money.

:wtf:

dg

[H2O Man]

9. David is good.

He knows the deal.

[WolverineDG]

4. ...

Breibart: IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING THIS IS WATERGATE 2!!!!!!!111!

Schuster: That's what people are calling it here.

Breitbart: BUT THE GOVERNMENT SAYS THERE WAS NO WIRETAPPING. YOU LIED!! TAKE IT BACK!!

Schuster: Okay.

Breitbart: THESE KIDS ARE ALL INNOCENT, YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO CALL THEM CRIMINALS JUST CUZ THEY GOT ARRESTED!! THE GOVERNMENT IS CORRUPT BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T INVESTIGATED ACORN WHICH IS FULL OF CRIMINALS!!!!11

Schuster: Well, your guys were arrested, & there's a warrant.

Breitbart: DOESN'T MATTER!! THEY ARE INNOCENT BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT ISN'T INVESTIGATING ACORN!!!11

Schuster: So, is O'Keefe on your payroll?

Breitbart: YES, I SEND HIM CHECKS BUT I DON'T KNOW WHAT HE'S DOING!!!

Schuster: Well, thanks, and now over to Media Matters....

dg

[fascisthunter]

2. hahaha... Breibart has been exposed for being nothing but a liar

you got caught sucka...

[SoCalDem]

6. I don't think it was "must-see" TV.

This Breitbart guy just wanted to pop off on MSNBC's dime & time. They need to STOP even "inviting" these freakazoids on . Let them wander off into the weeds at Fox and spout off..

There are many more important voices we need to hear.. Zinn;s passing points this out.. How many years have we been tormented by whatever nonsense pat Buchanan is espousing? and how often did we ever even see Zinn, or Chomsky, or Turkel, or Donahue? sure we could pay for Dish and get them in some poorly lit/produced program on FSTV or Link..or occasionally late at night on some obscure university channel, but these thinkers have been totally shut out, for decades...and in their place, we got guys like Breitbart, frothing at the mouth..

[spanone]

7. amen, teevee loves to raise the blood pressure

[gratuitous]

13. At least when Breitbart shows up somewhere other than Fox

There's an outside chance someone will show him up for the tool that he is. When he's on Fox, they'll serve him up marshmallow questions and never intimate by word, expression or camera angle that Breitbart is saying anything but the gospel truth. Now we have footage of Breitbart's true freakazoid nature.

[blondeatlast]

8. Good for Schuster for not letting that rat take over, though.

Still funny.

[H2O Man]

10. Recommended.

Thanks.

[KonaKane]

11. All Breitbart proved was that he can nonsensically repeat himself louder.

That's about it. One hell of a resume starter, I say.

[malaise]

12. Bwaaaaaaaaaaaaaah

:rofl: