Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Franken introduces legislation to change campaign finance laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:13 PM
Original message
Franken introduces legislation to change campaign finance laws
Here's Senator Al Franken's press release.

"Since 1974, federal law has banned foreign companies from giving or spending in American elections. Nothing in our current laws, however, explicitly prohibits foreign companies from creating American subsidiaries or getting control of American companies and using them to flood the airwaves in support of their preferred candidates. Citizens United gives companies unlimited power to do that - and does not distinguish between American companies and companies that are owned or controlled by foreign interests.

"I was pleased to hear the President recognize the need for this bill in his address last night," said Sen. Franken. "I think we can all agree that foreign interests have no place in American elections."

The "American Elections Act of 2010" was developed in coordination with Professor David Schultz of Hamline University School of Business in Minnesota.

"The Supreme Court decision in Citizens United was an attack on democracy and fair elections," said Professor Schultz. "It undid laws seeking to regulate corporations across the country and in Minnesota that go back over 60 years. As a result of it corporate money will flood into Minnesota, threatening the basic integrity of our elections and the power of citizens to control their own government. Senator Franken's bill is an important first step in addressing Citizens United and preventing money from further destroying our elections in Minnesota."


The "American Elections Act of 2010" will keep foreign interests out of our elections by:

· Banning election contributions and spending by corporations that are controlled or highly influenced by foreign nationals (foreign governments, companies, and persons). This includes:

- Corporations that receive most of their financing from foreign nationals.

- Corporations where foreign nationals hold a controlling share of stock (as defined under leading corporate law) or a majority of the Board of Directors.

- Corporations that allow foreign nationals to control or participate in their political activities - including ad spending, donations, and political action committees.

· Requiring all corporations to certify, before giving or spending in elections, that they are in compliance with these requirements.

· Requiring all corporations to disclose in their political advertising how much of their company is controlled by foreign nationals, or if this isn't possible, how much of their financing comes from foreign nationals.

The "American Elections Act of 2010" is supported by Common Cause, People for the American Way, Common Cause Minnesota, and MPIRG."

<http://minnesota.publicradio.org/collections/special/columns/polinaut/archive/2010/01/franken_wants_t.shtml>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LLStarks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:15 PM
Original message
Franken continues to lead the way and I'm loving it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
65. Good for him, yes, but he's not alone out front: Alan Grayson( D-Fla) introduced
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 08:48 AM by FailureToCommunicate
half a dozen bills on this BEFORE the Supreme Court decision was announced and was present in the court when it came out...

link to Grayson's reaction to SCOTUS decision:

http://demopedia.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=426017&mesg_id=426017
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #65
78. Wish we had more Graysons & Frankens.
:patriot:

(Grayson's petition when it first came out and forwarded it far and wide!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. K & R For Al! Gosh, I Like That Guy!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
88. He's good enough, he's smart enough, and, doggonit, people like him!
He's gonna be a star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fjc Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. How about requiring them
to do what the Republicans wanted the Unions to do, and get approval/authorization from their employees and/or stockholders before they can contribute to any candidate or cause.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. That's nice too...
can we do both?:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
31. Ha. That's a great idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. Good 'un--and I'm good with both! Brilliant. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. You go, Al! That's what we elected you for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Applause! Go, Franken. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. Not nearly strong enough. But a start. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
16. Need to re-submit Kerry-Wellstone's Clean Money, Clean Elections public financing bill from 1997.
Only 5 senators supported it then. I think we should be able to get a majority to do so now. I know Biden was for it back in the day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:38 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. Is this it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blackbart99 Donating Member (421 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #29
71. yes resubmit it but don't get on any small planes...nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 06:18 AM
Response to Reply #16
57. +1! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
56. Yes, we have to
enact stricter measures, obviously. But Franken is on it with this great first step.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
county worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. It is a good law. But the right must really be conflicted.
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 03:21 PM by county worker
All the anti diversity people who feel we are losing our national heritage and culture to foreign invaders from the south are going to fight against a law that has as it intent to keep foreigners from taking our national heritage of open elections away.

The SCOTUS's decision helps the right get their candidates elected but the middle class and lower class right wingers are going to get hit just as hard and we are by it. But like aways they will fulfill their roll as chumps or marks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agent46 Donating Member (424 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's not enough
Doesn't restrict corporate money in any way - just "foreign" influence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gristy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
47. I agree. There's a word for what is being offered here, but it escapes me.
Unlimited foreign corporate contributions to campaigns is a no concern to me at all.

Unlimited corporate contributions to campaigns is my concern and should be every American's concern.

Franken is wrong on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cyclezealot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:46 AM
Response to Reply #7
53. As if domestic corporations are not foreign to the body politic..
If corporate money must buy our elections, I say force them to say.. This ad brought to you by say, Phizer Corporation as we require politicians to say, "I am John McCain and I approve this message..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
8. Let's get 400+ Recs for this
and get the Supreme Court OUT of politics like it's supposed to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. K&R!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
11. We needed a Franken running in Mass. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I think we need a Franken in every state! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
26. Yes. Love Al but wish he would answer my emails.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WileEcoyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
43. Maybe if you stopped sending Al flowers and your hotel key
he'd take you more seriously (j/k)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:59 AM
Response to Reply #43
48. I am married and faithful dear
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #14
83. Clone Franken!
Franken . . . steins? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FailureToCommunicate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #11
64. We had one! His name was Mike Capuano. Unfortunately, back in the primaries
when Joe and Mary Numbskull voter were not, ah, as "informed" on the issues as they should have been, Martha Coakley had the name recognition and won. Mike Is great and luckily is still in the House. But he was feisty and a real blue collar guy, the kind that drives the kind of truck that is not a luxury vehicle like Scott Brown's and certainly wouldn't boast about as his main virtue. He could've campaigned toe to toe with fake 'populist' repub. Anyway, all water under the Tobin Bridge at this point...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janet118 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #64
84. I voted for Mike . . .
Martha was the choice of the powers that be and Khazei & Capuano split the leftie vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #64
89. Yup. I'm the other person who voted for Capuano.
It's a shame he didn't win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
12. the freshman shames his colleagues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. Probably not to wise a thing to do. But I love it. nt
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 07:07 PM by rhett o rick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Never mind the 80's
The 10's are the REAL Al Franken Decade. (old fans of SNL will get that one)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
15. Damn! That Was Quick!!
Go Al!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
17. What about American Corporations?????
This whole concept that corporations are 'persons' is ludicrous. PERIOD.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Billsmile Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. Corps(e)
The idea put forward that corporations are by design psychopaths deserves some attention. We don't allow psychopaths to participate in society. Why should we allow corporations unlimited influence in our society?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 06:19 AM
Response to Reply #17
58. Ain't that the truth! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. Thank God for Franken he makes Minnesota
not like the other senator who sits on her a** collecting corporate money and doesn't do anything about anything. She doesn't even answer an email. That's right. Never ever. Know how we click on to those messages to send. Well even Coleman answered them. He always gave the republican side, but he answered. Kolchubar has yet to even acknowledge she has gotten one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
19. How about we ask them for their birth certificates --- ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #19
59. I'm all for it! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Land Shark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
20. Reinforcing xenophobia and idea that corps get character or rights from shareholders = bad move. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mb7588a Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. Good, but not enough. Full public financing is the only solution. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
79. Exactly - McCain-Feingold was compromise. 1997 Kerry-Wellstone's Clean Money, Clean Elections bill
was the only bill EVER submitted that deserved passing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. Gonna give this a kick. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Union Yes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. Franken is a patriot! knr
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
25. knr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
27. Thank you, Al!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
groundloop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
28. Good first step Al. Now get to work on the constitutional amendmant to revoke corporate personhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kablooie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
30. And of course the Republicans who "love America" will all vote against this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:07 AM
Response to Reply #30
51. I love the way that Franken lays traps for the party of "no"... First it was the "rape" bill...
... and now this one.

They complain loudly that they are made to look bad when they vote no! Well of course Franken can sit back smugly and say "You have complete control over how you vote! You CAN vote yes on this bill if you want!" smugly while they stress on whether they want to sound inhuman or unAmerican or work against their Repulican overlords who want votes of no all of the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Politicub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #51
91. He is a gifted politician, that's for sure n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
32. Al Franken has intellect, ethics, and courage.
A rare combination in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
33. He's good enough, he's smart enough, and doggone-it, people like him!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JNelson6563 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
35. Oh snap!
Motherfuckers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
36. k + r n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
winyanstaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
37. I knew he would be a great senator!!!!!
YOU GO AL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazyjoe Donating Member (921 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'm not sure I like this. I would think foreign corporations
Edited on Fri Jan-29-10 10:54 PM by crazyjoe
would want to see democrats elected, the repubs don't have any support beyond these borders, only the brain dead parts of the country that vote for them, It's the American corporations that supports republicans.
We need to ban all corporations, not just foreign owned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 10:57 PM
Response to Original message
39. Coleman would have done the same thing.
Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-29-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
41. Is it time to make Al Franken majority leader?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnakeEyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
42. So how will they try and fight this publicly?
I'm guessing they will cite that FEC regulations already prohibit it and so Franken's law is unnecessary and redundant. Don't think it's going to work, too much outrage over this decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
naaman fletcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
44. Whats f'd up is that foregin companies will challenge this in the WTO or something..
They will say that this will give American companies an unfair advantage. Christ, this is so f'd up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
invisible Donating Member (22 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
45. I love Senator Al Franken!
He is clever, does the right thing, and stands up to Republican thugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bette Noir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
46. My hero.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oldtimeralso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
49. K & R and proud to help the cause n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
penndragon69 Donating Member (409 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
50. Franken / Grayson for president!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
52. Al's kicking ass and taking names.
I can't wait for the Republicans to try to challenge this. *cackles evily*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirtyDawg Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
54. I wish we'd quit fiddle-fartin'...
...around the edges on this and go all the way to a bill that calls for public financing of campaigns and an elimination of campaign contributions altogether. I mean this business of limiting 'foreign nationals', or more specifically corporations controlled by foreign nationals, can't possibly be monitored or accurately controlled. What about all the multi-national corporations that are HQed in the US? Plenty of those have significant interests overseas or that engage in business practices that result in much of their profits being re-routed to off-shore operations...and could be supporting candidates that allow just such practices.

Plus, there are simply way too many US corporations that only are interested in manipulating government in order to line their own pockets - can you say Haliburton? End it all I say, and if the SCOTUS gets in the damn way, impeach their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
55. This is why the GOP
fought so hard to keep Franken out. They knew he was going to "cause trouble", lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
60. Al knows that the Republicans are ALL "Big Fat Liars"
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 07:01 AM by Hubert Flottz
Al sees the light about "Bipartisanship" and other such BULLSHIT! Anyone who can't see through the GOPer's ducks in a row style propaganda is too stupid to govern. The GOPers hate the president and they let it show at the SOTU. "Bipartisanship" is extinct in Washington and the blame lies with the "Party of NO" The guys who can dish it out but can't take it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
61. God Bless em. Make the GOP vote against that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 07:03 AM
Response to Original message
62. Recommend. And doggone it, people like him!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 07:24 AM
Response to Original message
63. Let's not fuck around with half measures,
Instead let's have full on publicly financed election campaigns, from the local dog catcher to president. Take all corporate money out of our election process and reclaim government for the people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
66. this is one hell of a freshman senator
i can't recall the last time i've heard so much, and so much good, from a first year senator. well, i guess he's technically in the second year of his term, not they he was seated for much of the first.

first year senators are, by tradition, made to be quiet and learn the rules of the road before they get to do anything. hillary was *really* made to tone it down in her first year.

franken seems to make news and run committees all the time!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Puglover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
67. I love my Senator! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wial Donating Member (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
68. hello? corporations themselves are foreign interests!
they represent the feudalism we all came here to escape. and they're winning. do we have to go to Mars next as in Kim Stanley Robinson's series on the subject?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
69. Senator Franken, so ROCKS!
I'm SO proud to know that Al is my Senator. His letter of intent to address this travesty of justice, which I (and I'm sure many of his other constituents, that wrote him with their outrage about this awful ruling) received prior to his offering the legislation and his quick ACTION, should be an example to every other Democrat in the Senate.

It's somewhat of a nice kicker, that the most "junior," Senator on our side of the aisle, is the first to take a solid stand for We the People.

We need 99 more Senators just like him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressOnTheMove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
70. Thank the lord MN elected this man. He's shown that some of our progressive commentators ..
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 10:13 AM by ProgressOnTheMove
could really shake things up for the better if they had even just a little time on Capitol Hill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WillyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
72. Go Al !!! - K & R !!!
:bounce::woohoo::bounce:

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Martin Eden Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
73. Sounds like the bill does nothing to stop US corps from dominating elections
Much more is needed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
veganlush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
74. Go Al!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DutchLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
75. As if US elections had integrity *before* the SC made this ruling!
As if the people had control over their government before; as if corporations didn't buy elections before!

It's all so hypocritical, this outrage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemperEadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
76. Beautiful!
and the angle is perfect: highlighting Minnesota elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
77. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mithreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
80. Doesn't go far enough, but sounds good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
81. The second largest shareholder in NewsCorp is a member of
the Saudi royal family. Is that enough to trigger the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
82. Well done again, Al Franken
Now THATS Change I can even believe in :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
85. DAMMIT FRANKEN!
AGAIN, with the making sense! Keep this up and you'll erode my faith in DC. Having struggled, SO LONG, to understand it's secret workings - now I'm forced to consider the blinding light of truths and common sense forced upon us by you and Grayson and the handful of other "irrationals".

Psssst.... I really like it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokercat999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
86. Look, look, the horses have all run out of the barn. Quick
close the door.

Screw the SCOTUS, end corporate personhood today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jgraz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
87. Pay attention Dems: THIS is what a real Centrist looks like.
Finding common issues that EVERYONE (well, everyone who's sane) agrees on and directly addressing them. If you're not going to be a hard-left progressive, then THIS is the way you need to govern.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtLiberty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
90. I tried numerous times to get Franken's attention...
...on the 2004 stolen election. I must have sent 50 e-mails to his Air America program/producer. He stayed away from election fraud/electronic voting machines like the plague. Even when he had guests who approached the topic, he'd quickly move away from it. He'd admit that what happened in Ohio in 2004 was dirty and then drop it.

If he's successful with this bill, I guess I'd forgive him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
92. Late afternoon kick nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC