Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blair accused of putting war with Iran on the electoral agenda

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 02:57 PM
Original message
Blair accused of putting war with Iran on the electoral agenda
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 03:07 PM by G_j
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/30/tony-blair-iran-spin-chilcot

Tony Blair accused of putting war with Iran on the electoral agenda
Former prime minister slammed for trying to shift focus onto threat from Tehran during appearance at Chilcot inquiry

guardian.co.uk, Saturday 30 January 2010 13.01 GMT

Tony Blair has been accused of warmongering spin for claiming that western powers might be forced to invade Iran because it poses as serious a threat as Saddam Hussein.

Sir Richard Dalton, a former British ambassador to Iran, accused Blair of trying to make confrontation with Iran an electoral issue after the former prime minister repeatedly singled out its Islamic regime as a global threat in his evidence to the Iraq war inquiry yesterday.

Blair said many of the arguments that led him to confront the "profoundly wicked, almost psychopathic" Saddam Hussein seven years ago now applied to the regime in Tehran.
"We face the same problem about Iran today," he told the Chilcot inquiry.

Dalton, the UK ambassador to Iran from 2002 until 2006, said it was essential that all the political parties made clear in the run-up to the general election that there would be no repeat of Blair's actions in respect of Iran.

"One result of Tony Blair's intervention on Iran – he mentioned Iran 58 times – is to put the question of confronting Iran into play in the election," he told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme.

"We need to be much clearer, as voters, with our politicians and with our candidates that we expect a different behaviour and a greater integrity in our democracy next time."

..more..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who was it who quipped in 2003, "'Everyone wants to go to Baghdad; real men want to go to Tehran"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. Geez, what a POS BLiar is...
does he really expect the British public to buy his lies yet again? His delusion that he matters any more continues it seems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. I'm glad to hear he is getting blasted
by almost everyone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
3. Iran is about 4 times larger than Iraq, and no easier to govern
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Blair (or is it B-liar) shared the apocalypse thing with Bush
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 05:02 PM by glinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And the crusade mentality
Remember he is now Tony the poodle hearted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am sure that neither Brown nor (bad as he is) Cameron wants to drag us into Iran
Blair is a messianic religious nut, and a 19th century British imperialist born in the wrong century. Neither of which is common in current British politics. It is sad that he was PM -and a 'Labour' PM at that - at the wrong time.

He is politically finished in the UK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
7. Blair's self-description: "profoundly wicked, almost psychopathic"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. He said Iran almost as many times as he said September 11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. sad
deja vu
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-30-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. He came up with the "2010 Question" talking point
Edited on Sat Jan-30-10 09:09 PM by Solly Mack
Whereby you don't ask questions about what took place prior to March 2003 or during the whole clusterfuck, you ask instead...what would be happening in 2010 if we didn't invade...and according to Blair, Iran would be attacking everyone in 2010 if Saddam had not been removed in 2003..and that Saddam would be attacking as well.

Just another way to say pre-emption.

He kept saying over and over and over and over again, that people shouldn't be concerned with the invasion of Iraq or what he or Bush did but to remember that we will need the exact same actions to use against Iran.. in other words, people should thank Blair and Bush for giving them to tools and excuses that will allow them to invade other countries...primarily Iran.

That fucker even had the nerve to say that the torture at Abu Ghraib took "everyone by surprise" (including the White House)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 09:00 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. I sure hope I live to see the day
Tony and pals are invited to the Hague.

Blair believes that deception, lies and pre-emption give the world a model for the future.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-31-10 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
13. It all makes Mandelson's wish for Balir to campaign for Labour in the general election even worse
Tucked away in the Mirror's interview today with Peter Mandelson is confirmation that Tony Blair will return to British politics to campaign for Labour in the general election.

The First Secretary of State (what a wonderfully Soviet-style title that is) revealed:

We want all the party's leadership -- past and present -- to be contributing. They know as well as anyone what is at stake for the country. Everyone will get stuck in. Everyone will campaign: Tony Blair, John Prescott, David Blunkett.


I doubt that Blair's return will do Labour any good. There is a genuine risk that the Iraq inquiry will dissuade voters who deserted the party over the war from returning to the fold. In seats such as Bethnal Green and Bow, which George Galloway's Respect took from Labour in 2005, the war is likely to return as an election issue. Blair's presence on the campaign trail will only exacerbate the damage to the party.

http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/01/british-election-general


It'd be a bloody disaster for Labour, if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC