http://schoolfinance101.wordpress.com/2010/02/25/some-statistical-context-for-central-falls/<snips>
"Yes, Central Falls is in tough shape – very high poverty and relatively low performing. But, not really off the trendline (above it, if anything) for performance given its poverty level and better than other high schools of similar poverty."
<snips>
"Here’s the “relative efficiency” of Rhode Island High Schools with respect to cost, from lower to higher poverty high schools:"
"As it turns out, the relative efficiency of Central Falls HS stacks up pretty well with other Rhode Island High Schools. That is, the actual spending per pupil in Central Falls is not far off from the predicted amount to achieve their current outcomes, with their current population."
And <snips>
"This seems like a fairer comparison than simply casting stones at Central Falls teachers for their miserable test scores.
This is not to excuse low performance or to simply set a lower bar for this school because it serves a very high need population.
But it is to point out that given their resources and their kids, they are doing as well as can be expected and better than many other Rhode Island high schools."
Of course, the current political solution is not to address the sources of failure with support and resources; it's to fire the teachers that are "doing as well as can be expected and better than many other Rhode Island high schools."
Imagine what they might be able to accomplish with those students given adequate support and resources.