Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scott Brown's Maiden Bill: Provoke Iran

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 11:56 AM
Original message
Scott Brown's Maiden Bill: Provoke Iran

http://thephoenix.com/BLOGS/talkingpolitics/archive/2010/02/27/scott-brown-s-maiden-bill-provoke-iran.aspx?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+PHXTalkingPolitics+%28Talking+Politics%29



Scott Brown has chosen his first bill to sign on as co-sponsor -- well, technically his second, as he previously joined every other US Senator in co-sponsoring a resolution marking the death of Rep. John Murtha. But his first real one. And the winner is... provoking Iran!

It's a pretty clear signal to the right -- one of two he made on Thursday -- perhaps as atonement for his vote for the jobs bill earlier in the week.

The bill is S.3008, the "Iran Democratic Transition Act of 2010," introduced by Texas Republican John Cornyn and Kansas Republican Sam Brownback a few weeks ago. Cornyn and Brownback are apparently frustrated that President Obama hasn't done enough to support the "Green Movement" to topple the Iranian government. Among other measures, their bill would provide unspecified funding to Iranian opposition groups for their communications efforts to whip up resistance and foment revolution. It also includes a laundry list of charges against the Iranian regime.

-snip-


Anyway, on Thursday, Cornyn and Brownback got 19 of their most conservative Republican colleagues to sign on as co-sponsors -- and Brown was one of them. Say this at least: it's certainly consistent with his aggressively hawkish campaign rhetoric.
------------------------


maybe we could provoke Scott until he cried
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Iran-Contra Part Deux, here we come! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Is there a Contra War going on somewhere I don't know about?
And are we planning on trading arms to Iran so we can aid that Contra movement? Or do you just have a misunderstanding of what Iran-Contra was all about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Thanks for the smart-ass response, yes, I know what Iran-Contra
was about...and when you get to the bottom, it was essentially a way to break the law...and you don't think these jackasses will try to funnel money to any side they might like?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
2. but he might be a MODerate !
. . . soooo different from the rest!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. and mr brown, what the fuck if they don't want democracy? do we iraq them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. Told y'all that Snotty Scotty couldn't be trusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. No surprise. But may be now, DUers will stop saying he is a moderate?\nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:11 PM
Response to Original message
7. "their bill would provide unspecified funding".. but how will it be paid for? Yet again they don't
care about fiscal responsibility when it comes to making war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Was Senator Softcore wearing a thong?
Or does he wear his conservative pink leather shorts in Congress?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
9. So they are willing to spend money on this, but not unemployment or COBRA assistance
Good to know where their priorities are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Funding "opposition groups" in other countries has historically worked very well for us, hasn't it?
Edited on Mon Mar-01-10 12:34 PM by Proud Liberal Dem
NOT!!!!!!!!!!

Iraq (INC)
Afghanistan (Mujahadeen)
Countless additional examples.....

Why is it our business anyway unless they're actually threatening us? Some people never learn! :banghead:

We need something like a "Prime Directive" regarding our interactions with other countries IMHO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. You forget that it was our meddling in Iran that got us here in the 1st place
Maybe if we didn't fuck with the democratically elected govt there in the 1950s, we wouldn't be where we are today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. You are absolutely 100% correct
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why don't we get out of the business of meddling
in other countries' governments and start concentrating on our own country and government. Seems like we have more than enough messes to clean up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DocAimster Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. But the Right loves to meddle...
...they can't stand to keep their noses out of the affairs of other countries, but when it comes to the US they all claim to want "less government" involvement. Oh, the hypocrisy never ends with these right wing neanderthals!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ikonoklast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
13. I agree with him. Let's destabilize Iran.
Great idea. Let's do it right out in the open, for the entire world to see.




China, however, may not be too keen about it.

At all.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
15. "Obama hasn't done enough to support the Green Movement"
That's all the green movement needs is to have people believe the Americans are behind it.

What part of "walking softly and carrying a big stick" don't these a-holes understand? Hint: It ain't the big stick part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
17. Excellent choice Brownie!
Edited on Mon Mar-01-10 01:13 PM by unhappycamper
Iraq
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Yemen

And now we're trying to add Iran to the list...

You dumb fuck. We cannot afford to spend $1 trillion dollars a year to kill people and occupy their countries. And you want to add Iran? Did any of your kids enlist to support the cause?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-01-10 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
19. I can see why some people think giving the GOP control would be a great way to improve things.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC