Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican concern about the deficit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 04:02 AM
Original message
Republican concern about the deficit
Senator Bunning is claiming to be concerned about adding $10 billion to the deficit.

Yet when Bush was pushing for his tax cuts in 2003, Bush claimed that the deficit was not as important as the unemployed and those worried about putting food on the table:

"Yes, I'm worried about the deficit. I'm worried about the deficit, but I'm more worried about the fellow looking for work. I'm worried about the deficit, but I'm more worried about the single mom who's worried about putting food on the table for her children, so she could find work. And that's where the focus of this administration is going to be." May 12, 2003

As it turned out, the tax cuts of 2003 provided over $18 billion to just the 400 richest Americans and another $40 billion to people making over $2 million. And those billions have been added to the deficit every year since 2003 unlike this $10 billion which is a one time expense.

Senator Bunning voted for that, of course, like every other Senate Republican as it passed 51-50 in reconciliation.

Then just 4 months after that tax cut passed, Bush asked for another $87 billion for the Iraq occupation. Something that would add another $87 billion to the deficit. Senator Biden proposed an amendment that would have prevented that. Here's how Biden explained it.

"This $87 billion request will be added to the mountains of debt we have already piled up. From a projected 10-year surplus of $5.6 trillion when the President came to office, this administration has, by a kind of reverse alchemy, turned gold into lead. We face a $480 billion deficit this year alone, and that is not counting the $164 billion we will borrow from Social Security. There is no one in this Chamber who is a better expert on Social Security than the Presiding Officer, so she knows the real deficit is actually $644 billion.

So what do I do? I believe the fair, equitable way to deal with paying for this is to say to the wealthiest Americans, the top .7 percent, instead of you getting a total tax cut of $690 billion over the term of this tax cut, you are only going to get $600 billion.

I tried this out on wealthy Americans, and wealthy Delawareans. Can you imagine if the President of the United States, when he announced this $87 billion supplemental, said: And because of this, I am going to ask the wealthiest 1 percent of you--which means you have to be making at least $360,000 to get into that category of income. The average person in that category makes $1 million per year--I am asking you to forgo 1 year of your tax cut; not the whole tax cut, just 1 year of the 10 years of the tax cut you are getting."

Senator Bunning voted against that, opting instead to add the $87 billion to the deficit. In Bunning's eyes it's better to add to the deficit than to give a slightly smaller tax cut to those in the top 1%.

http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=108&session=1&vote=00373

And now he says he's worried about $10 billion.
$60 billion a year to people making over $2 million = no big deal
$87 billion borrowed to pay for Iraq reconstruction = no big deal
$10 billion borrowed to help people who cannot find jobs in this economy = time to take a stand.

So Republicans will pretend to care about the deficit when they can use this supposed concern to prevent helping working people but when it comes to handing billions to rich people or military contractors then the deficit is not a concern. Provides another fine example of which side Republicans are on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. the sad truth is, no one gives a fuck about the deficit now
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I don't find that sad
Now is not really the time to be concerned about the deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
2. Everybody knows they are hypocrites and liars when it comes to
the deficit (except the hillbillies at the TEA party rallies).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 04:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. Tell Bunning the $10 billion unemployment compensation will pay for itself.
The unemployed will throw flowers and candy at the rest of us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
4. Bunning's only motive is to make the Democrats and Obama look bad
It is nothing more than a political stunt by a dried up old republican asshole who cares nothing for country or people.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandyj999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-02-10 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
5. Now they're worried? How convenient. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC