Me.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-10 09:15 PM
Original message |
If Bunning Is So Against Deficits, Is He Going To Refuse His BIG FAT Senate Pension? |
|
and all his other perks, like paid for by the government, excellent health care?
|
TheCowsCameHome
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-10 09:20 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Crackpot Bunning will need it to pay for future care. |
|
Clearly, he's on the road to major repairs.
|
Lasher
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message |
2. He's not against deficits. |
|
He loves him some deficits when Republicans iz doin the spendin.
|
mindwalker_i
(836 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-10 10:25 PM
Response to Original message |
3. I'm sorry, you seem to be confusing... |
|
What a republican says with an actual argument. All these things that they say are like a "connect the answer with the question" test. There are these things, and republicans just pull them out to attach to whatever they want to do as a justification. The mistake is easy to make - that the answer does, indeed, have something to do with the action they desire. It's like this:
Q: Prayer in schools? A: Morality
Q: Sex scandal (democratic)? A: Personal responsibility
Q: Sex scandal (republican)? A: Freedom
Q: Torture and other war crimes? A: The sky is blue
Q: Cut funding for schools, vets, infrastructure, unemployment? A: Fiscal responsibility.
Q: Spend trillions killing people? A: Tough on crime.
These are just things to say, not meant to have any actual relation to reality.
|
Me.
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-02-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. You'll Fit In Just Fine |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:54 PM
Response to Original message |