Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

SC may gut programs for 26,000 disabled residents

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 07:12 AM
Original message
SC may gut programs for 26,000 disabled residents
Edited on Wed Mar-03-10 07:16 AM by democracy1st
COLUMBIA, S.C. – Lawmakers are considering cutting all services for nearly 26,000 people with disabilities as South Carolina tries to plug a $560 million budget hole.

Andrew J. Imparato, chief executive of the American Association of People with Disabilities, said he is hearing horror stories about budget cuts around the country, but South Carolina is the most extreme example. Shutting down everything but federally required residential care is "the most draconian kind of thing I've heard," he said.

Lawmakers say they have little choice. They are trying to close a shortfall in next year's budget in a heavily Republican state where tax increases are not considered a viable option.

Mary Bennett, a single mother of three, said the budget cuts would mean sending her 11-year-old autistic son to an institution or giving up her job at a Columbia program that helps parents like her. Her son goes to public school a few days a week and a state-funded program cares for him the other days.

"He's completely dependent on other people. He can't do anything himself," said Bennett, 47. "I wouldn't be able to work if they cut his services."

The budget approved by a House committee last week would provide services only for 4,800 people with disabilities living in group homes or institutions, the only type of care the federal government requires the state to provide.


More than half of the proposed cuts in the current version of next year's $5 billion budget — about $113 million in all — affect Medicaid and other human services programs. The Department of Disabilities and Special Needs would see its funding slashed by $42 million, or 28 percent.

Other states have raised taxes to deal with similar problems, but that's unlikely in South Carolina.

"There's just not a willingness to raise taxes in a Republican House," House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Dan Cooper, a Piedmont Republican said.


Advocates say the cuts will make it tougher for people to survive or thrive: No more door-widening or ramps for people using wheelchairs; parents caring for adult children with disabilities would lose day care programs where they learn basic skills and earn a little money; 48 percent of the state's Medicaid recipients would lose prescription coverage as the state imposes a three-drug cap instead of the current maximum of 10.


Other states, like Oklahoma and California, are also cutting services for people with disabilities, but the changes are minor in comparison. Advocates say the South Carolina cuts are shortsighted because they eliminate early-intervention programs that could help prevent more expensive problems down the road.

In Aiken County, Board of Disabilities Executive Director Ralph Courtney says budget cuts in the current fiscal year already have forced him to shut down programs that offer in-home help for parents of children ages 3 to 5 who have disabilities including autism or at risk of developing them. The need for help is "generally decreased if you get to them soon enough," Courtney said.

The state Department of Disabilities and Special Needs estimates that at $9,000 to $13,000 a year, providing in-home services for people with disabilities is less expensive than sending them to an institution or group home, where full-time care costs between $28,500 and $114,000 annually.

Shelia Dull, 46, said that under the proposed budget she would lose day care services for her 24-year-old daughter in Dorchester County that allow her to work a couple of days a week, as well as catheters and other supplies. Her daughter has spina bifida and uses a wheelchair.

"I can't leave her alone for eight hours by herself," Dull said. "What happens if she fell in the bathroom? Who would help her?"


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100303/ap_on_re_us/us_spending_cuts_disabilities
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 07:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is more proof that Republicans
would rather see people die than raise taxes to help others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Actually that seems to be the opinion of a majority of residents of sc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
2. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corpseratemedia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. Republicans are the new Eugenics Party
I'm going to start collecting this stuff, back from 30 years ago. They are about getting rid of the unemployed, the disabled, the poor, the mentally ill, "welfare queens," "acorn," homosexuals, and wanting to "annihilate progressives." Yes, trollers, using this language makes you a de facto Nazi. And you can't project and distort true historical comparisons when the reality fits so perfectly to your crazed behavior. You NEVER hear democrats talk about people the way the New Eugenics Party talks about people.

We know one when we hear one.

This is why Dems must show up en masse in November. We are fighting to replace dems who capitulate to eugenicists, and we have to show up to not let these death panelists get elected in Nov.

And if you're on the sidelines reading as a centrist-leaning "independent," do you really want people (if you lose your job) to represent you that think the poor are "stray animals that shouldn't be fed?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. So
what would you cut instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Raise taxes on high earners.
That is the humane way to deal with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. I thought that would be your answer
Right now, SC is a retirement mecca for people from the high-tax Northeast. Raise taxes, and you risk having them move somewhere else instead, such as Florida.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yes it is my answer to anyone who wants to live safely, healthy and
with some piece of mind in this country. Pay your taxes for the privilege and all will be well.

Now, if you raise taxes on the wealthier residents, the retirees should not be affected. Tax unearned wealth is my thinking here. Trust funds over $XX M will do. High earners over $250K.

Here's a bad idea: Kicking the poor in the face and thinking it's great you saved a buck. You can't turn your back on the least of us and be human. You cannot.

People around the world pay taxes to live well in a civilized manner. Get over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. All I know is that people are moving out
from NY, NJ, and California as well, and those states are in a major financial crunch. There's a balance between letting the rich get off easy, and chasing them away.

The cuts you decry are less than 10% of the cuts being made. I'm sure that those who are suffering the other 90% of the cuts feel the same way about their programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. Bu..bu..but South Carolina is a Republican Paradise!
I mean, didn't they elect Sanford and all these tax cutting wonders to make sure business would thrive there? :sarcasm:

Doesn't seem to be working out too well now, does it? Not that facts ever stand in the Repubs way....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. Jesus. I was lobbying against cuts in the MN capitol yesterday.
Edited on Wed Mar-03-10 09:15 AM by Odin2005
Here the cuts are only 2.5 percent, though. Fucking Puke bastards. My friend with cerebral palsy is always complaining to me that she can't get out as much as she wants to because her group home only has 2 staff, they lost the 3rd "flex" staff because of last year's budget cuts, and I blame the shortage of staff as one of the things that caused her to get raped.

I have staff myself (a couple hrs/day 3 days a week) for helping to clean and to help run errands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RT Atlanta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. What a sad state of affairs...
because as we all know, raising taxes (the most obvious way to address a budget shortfall) will not be considered.

It's only a matter of time before Georgia does the same thing (cut all "non essential" programs because shudder the thought of increased taxes).

Meanwhile, North Carolina seems to be distancing itself from the rest of the Old South states with more progressive ideas and climate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
13. I saw that on the news last night. Looks like these days in the USA, if you're poor,

disabled, etc.,....you're screwn.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PA Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
14. SC must be proud!!! Balance the budget on the backs of the disabled.
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 04:11 PM by PA Democrat
What a STUPID and cold-hearted move.

Many of these programs teach important skills that actually SAVE money now or down the road.

Cutting the prescription drug benefit means people will end up in the emergency room because they can't afford the drugs they need.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC