Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Michael Bennet to unveil reforms targeting filibuster, lobbying

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:12 AM
Original message
Michael Bennet to unveil reforms targeting filibuster, lobbying
More of this!


Bennet to unveil reforms targeting filibuster, lobbying
By Michael Riley
The Denver Post


Joining a growing number of lawmakers angry at Washington, U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet today will announce an ambitious set of reforms to change many of the rules under which his colleagues work, including an effort to restrict earmarks and limit the filibuster.

Using a scheduled midmorning speech on the Senate floor, Bennet will propose a package of bills that would cut a broad swath across a set of practices and procedures that have become notorious symbols of a gridlocked Capitol.

He will propose eliminating anonymous holds, banning private-sector earmarks, freezing pay and budgets for members of Congress, and barring lawmakers from lobbying for life.

Other reforms carry a symbolic punch. Lawmakers who hop rides on private jets would have to pay a percentage of the total charter cost and disclose everyone else onboard.

But the kicker is the call to restructure the filibuster, a tool that has been wielded with devastating effect in the past year by Republicans and moderate Democrats.


Bennet, who is up for election this fall and faces a primary challenge from Andrew Romanoff, would reduce the majority required to overcome a filibuster to 55 votes after specific conditions were met.

more...

http://www.denverpost.com/ci_14502062#ixzz0h6NRwakF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 10:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would still support anonymous holds with the following restrictions:
Not more than 1 per 60 days and could not be extended. A reason has to be provided publicly for the hold. Could not be used to cover multiple legislation or nominations. Could only be 30 days if the hold is on a nomination outside the Senator's state.

I totally agree with a ban on private-sector earmarks. They should only be used for government related projects. Not museums run by private groups or church related groups.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 10:10 AM
Response to Original message
2. LOL he's got my vote...
...just for introducing "disclose the names of everyone on the private jet" legislation. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC