Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 02:50 PM
Original message |
The House Armed Services Committee - Don't Ask, Don't Tell Working Group hearing. |
|
Wednesday, March 3, 2010 – 2:30pm – 2118 Rayburn – Open
The Military Personnel Subcommittee will meet to receive testimony on a review of the Department of Defense process for assessing the requirements to implement repeal of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”
Witnesses:
Dr. Clifford L. Stanley
Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness
Honorable Jeh C. Johnson
General Counsel of the Department of Defense
Co-Chair Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Working Group
General Carter F. Ham, USA
Commanding General, U.S. Army Europe
Co-Chair Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Working Group
Pentagon Channel
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 02:58 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Joe Wilson speaking now...wants to know if the current law is hurting anything |
|
unit readiness, cohesion, etc.....if repealing DADT is a "military necessity"...or not.
The 800 or so a year discharged for being Gay isn't a significant number to the military's ability to do its job.
No Constitutional right to serve in the military...he's reading from some talking point paper.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. If Joe Wilson is your rep...you have my sympathies. |
|
I don't think he missed a single right wing talking point.
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. What scum. And thank you for letting us know what's going on. nt |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Thankfully those talking points are easily countered. |
|
1. It does hurt unit cohesion and readiness when a gay soldier is discharged. That soldier was part of a well trained unit and has to be replaced with someone who is not familiar with the unit and who has not yet bonded with the unit.
2. The military isn't only about numbers of troops. It's about having the best troops for the job regardless of sexual orientation, race, gender or any other descriptive.
3. The military is charged with protecting the US by the Constitution and therefore must have the best personnel in order to fulfill its duty.
|
blogslut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:04 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Stanley is making an opening statement |
|
How the study group will go about its job...
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message |
8. Hamm is speaking. I know Hamm. Not that that means anything. lolol |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-03-10 03:07 PM by Solly Mack
He really didn't say much of anything in his opening.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Davis to Johnson - clarify what the study group job is |
|
to see if DADT can be/needs to be repealed. Because no one knew that already...snort.
Sorry...lol
to go more into detail
a repeals impact on readiness, recruiting, retention
how do you plan to get that information (still Davis asking)
Hamm answers....through surveys, asking families, wide outreach to get a wide avenue of views...etc.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Wilson back up.....blech |
|
he says there are 2 fundamental questions not being addressed
does current law undermine readiness?
will repeal improve readiness?
Wilson also worries that a repeal will be an attack on DOMA...because of benefits, etc.
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
11. Hell. If he just read reply #3 he'd have his answers. And I'm a vet. |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Wilson to Stanley - do you agree with General Conway that DADT is good as it is |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message |
13. Snyder...It (DADT) will be changed...America is changing, etc.. |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Snyder to Johnson in light of 9th circuit ruling and its application within the force |
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
18. Wow, that ruling is EXACTLY what I've been saying for years. |
|
You're doing a fantastic job with this hearing and providing background information. Thank you.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. Thank you for being here too!!! |
|
I'll dig up the background as I can...it helps me too.
:hi:
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:26 PM
Response to Original message |
17. Murphy was up...I was afk for most of it. Sorry |
slipslidingaway
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
Soylent Brice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:31 PM
Response to Original message |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:32 PM
Response to Original message |
22. uh...who is that? :o) |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #22 |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-03-10 03:36 PM by Solly Mack
|
Cerridwen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message |
23. K & R and thanks! Solly. |
|
I can no longer watch this stuff in real time. It's gone from "making my teeth itch" to causing gum disease. *sigh*
:yourock:
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #23 |
26. I've gritted mine a few times already. LOL |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-03-10 03:40 PM by Solly Mack
:hi: !!! Cerridwen
You rock too!!!
|
Cerridwen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #26 |
28. I was actually thinking you probably had. |
|
Here I've never met you and I can "picture" "you" gritting your teeth through typing the summary. LOL
:hi:
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:37 PM
Response to Original message |
25. Representative Johnson speaking now |
|
Praising Murphy for fighting discrimination in the military
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:41 PM
Response to Original message |
27. Talking about what Congress will do/can do prior to the study group's findings |
|
If Congress should go ahead and repeal before...
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:44 PM
Response to Original message |
29. *Readiness* is the BIG word of the day |
Hell Hath No Fury
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:45 PM
Response to Original message |
30. Thanks for keeping us posted! |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #30 |
32. You're welcome, HHNF!! |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message |
31. Worries about influence from higher ups and their personal views |
|
You know...if Obama, Gates, etc.. will impact how people answer
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #31 |
33. Huh. He didn't worry when it went the other way. nt |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message |
34. Hamm talking about upcoming trip to Israel & how foreign militaries |
|
deal with not discriminating.
Hamm and his "uniquely American culture"....which is either code for a bunch of bigots or he was being polite...
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:54 PM
Response to Original message |
36. Davis ..how will you get the views of troops without retribution for their answers |
|
Johnson...will look into how
They could try just not seeking retribution
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
37. Who is that Congress critter? |
|
I can't see his name plate.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
|
Whew...I can rid myself of that thought now. LOL
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 03:55 PM
Response to Original message |
38. Taking a 30-40 minute break |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 04:14 PM
Response to Original message |
40. Thank you everyone!!! |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 04:51 PM
Response to Original message |
42. Asking about how to ask Gay & Lesbian troops w/o it being a violation of DADT |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message |
43. Snyder pointing out that the military can carry out whatever Congress decides |
|
and should they - Congress - go ahead and wrk on a repeal...if Hamm has any doubt whether they could carry out what Congress says
Hamm says he and the military will obey the law.
|
Uzybone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 04:53 PM
Response to Original message |
44. Jesus ....only 7 recs? |
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #44 |
47. I know. It's ridiculous. This is important stuff and Solly is doing a great job. |
|
Even posting legal opinions and articles to we can know what they're referring to in the hearing.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 04:55 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Edited on Wed Mar-03-10 04:57 PM by Solly Mack
Talking about lessons to learn from other countries...no mass exodus of troops, etc.. (by lifting the ban)
None of the fears proved to have any connection to fact or reality (go figure)
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #45 |
48. Murphy is wonderful, don't you think? nt |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #48 |
50. I'm enjoying his willingness to fight for the equal rights of all troops. |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Doesn't want to see any member separated by giving their opinion during the study groups work
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
49. Hamm says they (Hamm/Johnson) have latitude in how they go about the |
|
inquiry process....to protect gay/lesbian troops during the study.
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #46 |
51. I'd be more worried that the gay and lesbian soldiers could be |
|
trapped by giving their opinions. I want there to be NO enforcement of the law from now on and I want the law to be repealed as soon as possible.
Gay and lesbian soldiers must know that there will be no firings as a result of their honest answers when asked.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #51 |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
52. Different groups/teams - within the study group...will look at different aspects. |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:07 PM
Response to Original message |
54. Davis - seek help from recruiters? Hamm...yes...all areas..all aspects |
|
including service academies...reserve officer training corp...a broad range of input
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message |
55. let's not bog the repeal down with minutia |
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #55 |
57. And a damn good comment, too. |
|
Sounds like having different teams working on various aspects could speed it up. Hopefully, anyway. I'm sure some people will drag their feet no matter what.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:14 PM
Response to Original message |
56. Snyder speaking to aggressive recruitment of young people to join the military |
|
at a time when some young people are discovering their sexuality and then telling them they can't serve...how is that fair to young people...in regards to how unfair DADT is now.
|
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:16 PM
Original message |
Oh boy. That hits home. I knew a soldier like that. Well, probably 2. |
|
One was kicked out. The other managed to stay under the radar as he grew up and realized who he really was.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:18 PM
Response to Original message |
59. I've seen it too...and it's heartbreaking. |
DevonRex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #59 |
60. Some are barely more than children when they enlist. And if they |
|
come from, say, a fundamentalist background it can take quite a while until they're mature enough to understand themselves and then even to accept themselves as they are.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #60 |
62. That is so true...and the last thing they need is hostility. |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message |
58. Murphy - country/military/security will be better off by repealing DADT |
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
61. The first review is due March 19 (from the study group) |
|
They had 45 days from the time the group was formed to give Gates a review/ action report.
Also, they have to keep Congress abreast of their findings.
|
Solly Mack
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-03-10 05:24 PM
Response to Original message |
63. I think that's it. Thanks again!!!!! |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:13 AM
Response to Original message |