Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Child clears airliners for take-off at JFK (FAA not amused)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
icymist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:26 PM
Original message
Child clears airliners for take-off at JFK (FAA not amused)
Child clears airliners for take-off at JFK
Wed Mar 3, 12:49 pm ET
NEW YORK (AFP) – Children love to play with airplanes, but US flight authorities were in uproar Wednesday after a youngster directed real airliners from the control tower at New York's JFK airport.

"Jet Blue 171 contact departure," says a squeaky voice in a February 17 recording aired by WFXT-TV television in Boston.

The pilot of the airliner responds and tells the child: "Awesome job."

"That's what you get guys when the kids are out of school," laughs an adult at the control tower, presumably supervising the child.

More
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I guess I can understand the FAA covering their ass
But there were no problems. Write the guy up and get back to business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. In defense of the kid, the flight *was* heading to Sesame Street
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think if I were on the receving end of that child's voice...
(with the lives of scores of passengers in my hands) I would NOT be amused. Good on the FAA for suspending this guy. What judgement :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The two pilots mentioned seemed fine with it
Not everything is a matter of life and death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Perhaps they knew the air traffic controller... that would make a difference
Their job, however, is the difference between life and death at times--- and those times are not always predictable. Let the kids watch under supervision, but let the professionals do the job. FAA regs are there for a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. It is on 22L at KJFK (a matter of life and death).
Edited on Wed Mar-03-10 08:45 PM by DemoTex
Or 36 at KDCA. Or 27 at KBOS during simultaneous operations on intersecting runways.

Imagine the shit-storm if another American Flight 587 accident (11/12/2001: JFK departure in clear weather that crashed in Belle Harbor in Queens) happened while this crap was going on.

As an airline captain with 17,000+ accident-free hours and as an ALPA-trained airline accident investigator, I am appalled by both the cavalier replies from pilots on the tape and a statement that "Not everything is a matter of life and death."

In my opinion, this is right up there with the USS Greeneville submarine, entertaining some GOP contributers, sinking a Japanese fishing vessel on 2/9/2001. The air traffic controllers at JFK were just lucky no aircraft as much as blew a tire. Or, maybe not. They were obviously too stupid to realize the tapes would get 'em. The controller and tower chief, at a minimum, are toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. But you did notice nothing bad happened?
My point is, nothing happened, write the guy up and move on. I don't think that firing this guy and probably making sure he never works again is a sound solution. That squeaky voice kid doesn't need to have his life thrown into the shitter over some stupid thing his dad did.

I'm glad I don't need to work with people that are so friggin' uptight all the time. Life is too short to worry about this kind of shit when there are real travesties to concern ourselves with. Some kid saying exactly what his father would say (because he told him what to say) isn't the most horrific thing in the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. You obviously have never kicked tin at an airline crash site.
I have. I'll put my credentials up against your flimsy opinions on this subject 24/7. It is so much deeper than you are grasping.

You, sir, might be wrong on this one - IN MY EXPERT OPINION. I say this hoping that you will not take it as a flame (nor the mods). It is simply a statement of fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Once again...
...there was no crash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Nite nite child
Sleep well
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. I sleep well every night
Thanks. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JanMichael Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Dude. You are making innane statements to a retired pilot
stupid is no way to go through life, child.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Yeah, I'm stupid
You're awesome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Midlodemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. +1 Common sense seems to be in short supply, johnnie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nimvg Donating Member (77 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #17
32. Just Finished...
...my Private Written exam about three hours ago, looking for a good place to finish my cross countries and take a checkride with a minimum of bullshit. One instructor says since I have sixty hours (long story), it's okay to go to Sheblee's because there's not a whole lot remaining for them to cover. What do you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LuckyLib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
5. This is beyond stupid. Keep your kids at home. Do your job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Sometimes the kids have to go to work with the parents.
That doesn't mean they have to do their jobs though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Would you say that to a police officer or fireman?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I am not saying it for any particular job. Sometimes
things come up. Obviously if it is a dangerous job, you wouldn't take the children with you. But if it isn't a dangerous job, and there is no other option, I don't see it as a problem as long as it is allowed. I didn't say let the children do the job, but parents' get in binds sometimes. Daycares close, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. There are certain professions where it is a given children can not
come to work.. As one who has always worked in these fields, I was always made to understand that one had to have a first, second, third, and ultimate back up plan for the kids if it were impossible to take the day off (and usually it was). If air traffic control falls under this category (and I certainly would expect that it would) then I find it very hard to understand their bringing the child with them. Yes, shit happens, but that is why you have a plan A, B, C, and D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Air traffic control qualifies as a dangerous job, since lives depend on it
This was an incredibly stupid decision by the controller. Take the day off - and the penalties involved - if you can't find childcare; don't risk lives. The firing was the right call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shell Beau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. I am not upset by the fact that his kid was with him. It was a very
poor decision to let the child do what he did though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
REP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Distractions, like small children, do not belong in an air traffic control tower
Other children, after all, are on those planes those controllers are directing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
7. UPDATE: JFK air traffic controller let not one, but TWO kids direct planes: officials
The Kennedy Airport air traffic controller who brought his son to work and let him direct several planes let a second child do the same thing the next day, officials said Wednesday.

An initial investigation by the Federal Aviation Authority revealed that the unidentified controller's second child gave directions to two separate planes on Feb. 17.

The revelations emerged a day after the controller and his supervisor were suspended over the Feb. 16 incident.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/2010/03/03/2010-03-03_jfk_air_traffic_controller_let_not_one_but_two_kids_direct_planes_officials.html#ixzz0hA04OEDJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. scary! as it is, there are near-misses at JFK ; the traffic controllers are over-worked and
stressed; having kids in the tower is just not smart; lives are at stake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thelordofhell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. near-misses?
So they hit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. try looking up the term
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. Read and learn...
By definition, a near-miss is two aircraft in flight that come within 500 feet of each other. Aircraft are to stay at least 1,000 feet apart vertically and three miles horizontally, according to the FAA.
http://www.aero-news.net/EmailArticle.cfm?ContentBlockID=5deffb00-30d3-42c8-8f02-da2d1434aece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
heli Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
12. Control towers should be kidfree zones. The flying public has enough crap to worry about.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cherokeeprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. Bad judgment doesn't begin to describe how screwed up this was.
What I find the most disturbing is that there are people who would defend this as no big deal. I'm flabbergasted by that. This is a job which should be shielded from any and all distrations. Everyone involved should be reprimanded at the very least, and the supervisor who allowed it should be demoted

Imagine if something bad had resulted from this... We'd be here blaming Reagan instead of laughing it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
15. Beyond stupid and you couldn't hardly even
make out what the kid was saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PacerLJ35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-03-10 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
31. This isn't as big a deal as some are making it out to be
The other controllers (there are more than one) working the tower cab were all on headset with mics, and the tower chief could override the other mics if need be. The child was prompted about what to say, they weren't just "winging it" and making stuff up. I've let my kids talk on the radios before while flying, and even let them manipulate the controls to a degree. Kids get into it and it gets them interested in a career by doing stuff like that.

I read somewhere that somebody on this board stated it could cause another AA 587...except that mishap wasn't even remotely related to ATC issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC