Bart Stupak will put 33 million people at danger...

[tallahasseedem]

if they don't compromise on the abortion amendment. Just stated on Hardball.

Is he up for re-election? If so, we need him out.

[Warpy]

1. He's on my list

and as soon as I find out he's got a primary opponent, I will be contributing. Even if the primary opponent is another right wing ultra Catholic woman hater, changing over will give us a junior Senator with far less power, an improvement.

Stupak needs to revisit why we have the separation between church and state. While he might feel fervently that his church's dogma should have the effect of civil law, it's contrary to what this country is about.

He needs to go.

[TheWraith]

3. Stupak isn't a Senator.

He's a congressman.

[Warpy]

4. Sorry, brain fart

It happens.

[Bitwit1234]

2. Every two years they all go. Wouldn't it be nice if they only got two

terms and were never allowed to run again.

[walldude]

6. Term limits and Campaign finance reform

are the only things that are really going to save us. Too bad the people who need to vote for it are the ones it will hurt the most.

[JerseygirlCT]

5. I asked this in another post on the topic, but

Can the DCCC put the screws to those who won't get in line? Can they say, "vote for HCR, or no money for you"?

[tnlefty]

7. Reverently,

I just hope that his *^&% falls off in his sleep tonight.

Building up my negative karma one ^%$#head at a time.

[customerserviceguy]

8. That might be easier said than done

While many Blue Dogs will be sweating the coming election, Stupak won't be one of them. He won last election with about two-thirds of the vote. He actually came down a few points from where he finished in 2006.