Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Senate rejects $250 checks for elderly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:11 PM
Original message
Senate rejects $250 checks for elderly
This surprised me. I figured the drug lobbyists would have bought enough votes to pass, since a good portion of the HUGE $250.00 would have found its way into their pockets. And, at least 10 Democrats joined the Repubs on this.

Oh well...enjoy that can of cat food, you ungrateful seniors.

Senate rejects $250 checks for elderly

"WASHINGTON (Reuters) – A measure to give some 57 million elderly people, veterans and persons with disabilities a $250 check was rejected by the Senate on Wednesday, a setback for the powerful seniors' lobby.

President Barack Obama has called for Congress to approve the payments to make up for their benefits not increasing this year, but the Senate defeated it 50 to 47.

The payments would have added $13 billion to a $108 billion job-creation package pending in the Senate.

Congress approved payments last year as part of the $862 billion stimulus package.

Social Security payments for the elderly and disabled will stay flat this year for the first time since 1975 because they are tied to consumer prices, which decreased amid the worst economic recession in 70 years..."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100304/pl_nm/us_usa_congress_elderly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. "The payments would have added $13 billion..."
And yet, $9 billion still goes missing in Iraq...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'd like to know who the 10 Dems were who voted against it.
I have a strong feeling they're DLC/NDC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. More than 10...here they are:
Russ Feingold (D-Wisconsin);
Bennett (D-Colorado);
Feinstein (D-California);
Levin (D-Michigan);
Udall (D-Colorado);
Bayh (Indiana);
Carper (Delaware);
Landrieu (LA);
McCaskill (MO);
Nelson (NE);
Shaheen (NH);
Warner (VA);

http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/33235
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Senator Levin is going to hear from me again
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 01:59 PM by dmr
Rarely does he disappoint.
:grr:

Edit to say, I was hoping this would buy me new glasses.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CountAllVotes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. thanks for nothing DEAR DIANNE!
Rich ass bitch! :mad:

Thanks for nothing once again!

:dem: :kick:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Feingold and Feinstein?? WTF??

:mad: :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DrDan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. a lousy $13B - a little over a month of our ridiculous war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. "but the Senate defeated it 50 to 47." sigh. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arbusto_baboso Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
6. Looks like it ain't just Bunning saying "Tough shit" to Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. Hurts but true!
:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RantinRavin Donating Member (423 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Ah yes, the old cat food ploy
Except cat food costs more than people food nowadays....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipi_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well there are options...
Dry cat food goes a long way.

So does the canned stuff, if a person only has half a can at each meal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. This deserves more attention from DUers!
Kick & Recommend

Nice that Senate gave Wall Street billions, but screws seniors/veterans/disabled $250.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Exactly.

It's just unbelievable and disgusting. Can't believe Feingold went ahead with this (WHY, Russ??), and furious at my Senator, Feinstein.

x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morning Dew Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. I want to know what consumer prices went down.... I sure didn't find lower prices in stores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. The powers that be don't include price of necessities such as food, utilities, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
16. fucking the elderly again are they
while 52,000 a minute is spent on corporate wars

and how much are we paying for mercenaries?

Levin you asshole.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
19. But they rake in over 3,000 a year raise for themselves.
We know republicans wouldn't vote for it but 13 democrats. I put a curse on every single one of them. And hope they loose their next election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Obamanaut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. Unless they die or retire, they have a reelection rate of nearly
95%

We vote for the 'name you know', and they know it so they don't really care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
21. Here's the whole list
Grouped By Vote Position YEAs ---47
Akaka (D-HI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Begich (D-AK)
Bingaman (D-NM)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Burris (D-IL)
Byrd (D-WV)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Casey (D-PA)
Conrad (D-ND)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Durbin (D-IL)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Hagan (D-NC)
Harkin (D-IA)
Inouye (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaufman (D-DE)
Kerry (D-MA)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Kohl (D-WI)
Lautenberg (D-NJ)
Leahy (D-VT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Pryor (D-AR)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schumer (D-NY)
Snowe (R-ME)
Specter (D-PA)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Tester (D-MT)
Udall (D-NM)
Webb (D-VA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

NAYs ---50
Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bayh (D-IN)
Bennet (D-CO)
Bennett (R-UT)
Brown (R-MA)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Carper (D-DE)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Collins (R-ME)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Feingold (D-WI)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Graham (R-SC)
Grassley (R-IA)
Gregg (R-NH)
Hatch (R-UT)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Johanns (R-NE)
Kyl (R-AZ)
Landrieu (D-LA)
LeMieux (R-FL)
Levin (D-MI)
Lieberman (ID-CT)
Lugar (R-IN)
McCain (R-AZ)
McCaskill (D-MO)
McConnell (R-KY)
Murkowski (R-AK)
Nelson (D-NE)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Udall (D-CO)
Vitter (R-LA)
Voinovich (R-OH)
Warner (D-VA)
Wicker (R-MS)

Not Voting - 3
Bond (R-MO)
Hutchison (R-TX)
Isakson (R-GA)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
22. Kick for evening crowd. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC