Soylent Brice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 01:48 PM
Original message |
|
:argh:
:nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke::nuke:
|
| MineralMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 01:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Yah, but you know the name now. That was the intent of their |
|
posting that crap. It worked.
Now, let's ban the site from DU.
|
| Soylent Brice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 3. Perhaps, but we'd have to ban every website that lied to increase their traffic... |
|
...which would include a lot which are regularly cited here.
|
| MineralMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 7. That'd be fine with me. Lots of bogus sources quoted here. |
|
Even some parts of HuffPo are bogus, like their alternative health pages. Now, I see they're letting the quacks write on their site, with links to the quackery site. Feh!
|
| TheWraith
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
I find it ridiculous and depressing when people supposedly grounded in reality succumb to the woo-woo stuff about alternative health, the evils of vaccination, and all that. If the science doesn't back you up, you've got nothing.
|
| MineralMan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #14 |
| 15. Bingo! You are absolutely right. Fortunately, there is a group of |
|
people on DU who are pretty dedicated to debunking the woo that is often spread here.
|
| Raine1967
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 01:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Drudge posted this for a while as well... |
|
He's got a lotta faith in Radar, it seems....
|
| inna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 02:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| Soylent Brice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
reported that Roberts was leaving the SCOTUS, only to turn around and correct themselves within minutes/hours whatever.
obviously whoring for attention.
|
| Blue Owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message |
| bullwinkle428
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. They need to stick with dishing dirt on Tiger's cocktail waitresses! |
| Warpy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message |
| 10. Most people here responded with skepticism |
|
I did because nobody's going to give up a cushy lifetime gig in tough economic times.
|
| 951-Riverside
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 11. and get those exclusive with Octomom! |
| Soylent Brice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
| 12. my fingers were crossed with hopes of an impending scandal. |
| LLStarks
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-04-10 02:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 13. *looks at TC's message, avatar, and sig and enjoys the irony* nt |
|
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 02:51 PM by LLStarks
|
| Confusious
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-05-10 08:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 16. Radar O'Reilly has a web page? |
|
And you have something against him? He always seemed like a nice fellow.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
