Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Veil of secrecy covers Toyota cars’ ‘black boxes’

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:06 PM
Original message
Veil of secrecy covers Toyota cars’ ‘black boxes’
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 10:14 PM by DainBramaged
Has frequently refused to provide key information sought by crash victims and survivors.
Uses proprietary software in its EDRs. Until this week, there was only a single laptop in the U.S. containing the software needed to read the data following a crash.
In some lawsuits, when pressed to provide recorder information Toyota either settled or provided printouts with the key columns blank.
Toyota's "black box" information is emerging as a critical legal issue amid the recall of 8 million vehicles by the world's largest automaker. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration said this week that 52 people have died in crashes linked to accelerator problems, triggering an avalanche of lawsuits.

When Toyota was asked by the AP to explain what exactly its recorders do collect, a company statement said Thursday that the devices record data from five seconds before until two seconds after an air bag is deployed in a crash.

The statement said information is captured about vehicle speed, the accelerator's angle, gear shift position, whether the seat belt was used and the angle of the driver's seat.

There was no initial mention of brakes — a key point in the sudden acceleration problem. When AP went back to Toyota to ask specifically about brake information, Toyota responded that its EDRs do, in fact, record "data on the brake's position and the antilock brake system."



Toyota recall timeline
Toyota is facing the biggest recalls in its history after uncovering widespread problems with several aspects of its vehicles.

But that does not square with information obtained by attorneys in a deadly crash last year in Southlake, Texas, and in a 2004 accident in Indiana that killed an elderly woman.

One attorney in the Texas case contends in court documents that the Toyota may have deliberately stopped allowing its EDRs to collect critical information so the Japanese automaker would not be forced to reveal it in court cases.

"This goes directly to defendants' notice of the problem and willingness to cover up the problem," said E. Todd Tracy, who had been suing automakers for 20 years.




http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35713831/ns/business-autos/


Yup, all you folks defending these bastards..........they KNOW what the problems are, THEY KNOW. And they refuse to allow ANYONE see the data. GM Routinely allows investigators to read the data on their boxes.

I wish I could shake these bastards by the throat to make them realize ONE HUMAN LIFE is worth more than the yen they covet.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. On GM's openess...from the same article
General Motors, for example, has licensed the auto parts maker Bosch to produce a device capable of downloading EDR data directly to a laptop computer, either from the scene of an accident or later. The device is available to law enforcement agencies or any other third party, spokesman Alan Adler said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UP_4012 Donating Member (112 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. In my opinion, they are just covering up.
There is NO FUCKING EXCUSE for the amount of electronics in these japanese shit boxes. (by that I mean what meets the academic definition of "car") Seriously, my friend's Camry has more electronics in it than ANY other car I have EVER been in. Anyone who has ever used a computer knows that software is not necessarily the most reliable thing on the planet, but yet we trust it with our lives and the lives of those around us. Give me some fucking cables that move mechanical parts that we have been using for the better part of 70 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grand Taurean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. As you said.
I am no fan of Japanese cars these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The engineering alone must cost millions
WHY would they spend so much on engineering on parts that have no practical use?

It doesn't make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Blue Screen of Death
How many times do electronic devices with OS need to be rebooted because it locks up?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Toyota's new campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Rec'd n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. GM or Ford for me from now on.
I love my 2006 Chevy Colorado.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
8. Only 5 seconds prior to the crash?
In the crashes involved didn't the triggering event occur possibly as much as minutes before the crash?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. One second would be better than nothing
5 seconds before the crash and two seconds afterward is a long time. I've been in a couple and believe you me time does slow down enormously when you see that vehicle coming at the door you're sitting on one side of. or the hood that is between it and you. In this case any is better than none.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:16 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Five Seconds Is An Eternity...
If you've been in a serious collision, it doesn't take long. The boxes can't measure the operator...such as being distracted on a cellphone or asleep, all it measures is the actions or reactions of the mechanics of the car and in a crash those details don't become appearant until the second before the crash. This information is stored on a chip...not much room for a lot of data, especially if there are more systems added to the monitoring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I understand that. But IMO it is going to miss out on what caused the crash
in this type of situation. If the incident happens prior to 5 seconds it will not record the electronics happening at the point it occurred. At 80mph it is only 586 feet in 5 seconds. And if it happens out on the highway the driver has a bit more than 5 seconds before it crashes. How many of these Toyota crashes that occurred took 5 seconds or less before the malfunction started?

Now I can see where a chip wouldn't hold much information several years ago. But in the last few years the amount of info it can hold has greatly increased. Or at least I thought it has.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. I wish I could find a video of Mr. Toyoda answering questions about this very thing
during the hearing.

Reading it is one thing, listening to his jive excuses is something completely different.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stinky The Clown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
13. Criminal charges against the corporation
That will do it.

A paradigm shifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
14. Toyota is toast.
I don't think they are going to recover from this. They had half a chance before their stunning malfeasance and horrific cheating was revealed. Now they have no chance. They will be effectively gone within 5 years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
15. I've felt since almost day one.
.... that "floor mats" and "sticking pedals" did not begin to explain the events that happened.

Here's my number one rule Toyota, it would serve you well "when you find yourself in a hole, stop digging".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
17. I want to know when they stopped allowing the EDRs from collecting the data?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
18. You're damn right they know - it is the software (probably burned into hardware). Shims are cheaper
Replacing the electronics is expensive. One would think it would be cheap, but the problem is almost certainly in a core system encoded in hardware and probably sealed in epoxy in a little "module" to make reverse engineering difficult. That's an expensive fix. Giving the owner a placebo called a "shim" is a much less expensive way to handle it. I don't know how anyone can be dumb enough to believe their car was fixed by that and based on the post-shim incidents of runaway cars, obviously some are aware that it isn't a "shim", it is a "sham".

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC