Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House Delayed Regulation of Controversial Chemical after Meeting with Lobbyists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:52 PM
Original message
White House Delayed Regulation of Controversial Chemical after Meeting with Lobbyists
White House Delayed Regulation of Controversial Chemical after Meeting with Lobbyists


Lisa Jackson, the Obama administration’s top environmental official, has made it clear she thinks bisphenol A (BPA), an industrial chemical used to make plastic products, is a dangerous threat to the public. And yet after chemical industry lobbyists met with officials at the White House in December, Jackson’s agency, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, decided to pull back on regulating BPA for the next two years.

This revelation was reported by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel as part of a three-year investigation into the risks posed by BPA, which has been linked to health problems for fetuses, infants and children.

But while the EPA has given up on regulating BPA, the Food and Drug Administration has decided to get tougher with the chemical’s use in products. The FDA says it will work to limit the public’s exposure to the chemical, which has been found in the urine of 93% of Americans tested, and seek to get manufacturers to report how much BPA they produce, where they make it and how it’s used, according to the Journal Sentinel.

The FDA’s moves represent a reversal for the agency, which previously was exposed by the newspaper for relying on industry data to judge BPA.

http://www.allgov.com/Controversies/ViewNews/White_House_Delayed_Regulation_of_Controversial_Chemical_after_Meeting_with_Lobbyists_100222
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. It does gets rather predictable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. shocked...shocked! I tell you...
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oh, there's a shocker
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Meet the new boss... same as the old boss!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. god I miss President Bartlett........n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Another bullet item for Obama's impressive and ever expanding List O'Accomplishments!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. DOJ's environmental enforcement chief had been a lawyer defending GE's pollution of the Hudson. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
10. Hey, whatever makes us sick is good for Big Pharma
and apparently this WH believes that whatever is good for Big Pharma is good for the US of A.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. :banghead:
:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulfcoastliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Strong leadership we can believe in. If you're a plastics executive, that is.
The rest of us can eat endocrine disrupters and like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC