Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Sidewalks are the responsibility fo homeowners" Just heard on my local news

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:13 PM
Original message
"Sidewalks are the responsibility fo homeowners" Just heard on my local news
Edited on Fri Mar-05-10 02:15 PM by Liberal_in_LA
Los Angeles is considering leaving sidewalk repair up to homeowners to save $$$. :think: :wow:

Question for homeowners... have you ever repaired the sidewalk in front of your home?

http://www.contracostatimes.com/california/ci_14515744

LA budget ideas include do-it-yourself sidewalk repair for property owners
By Rick Orlov Staff Writer

Asking Los Angeles property owners to repair their own sidewalks was among several ideas floated Thursday by the City Council to help offset a $684 million budget shortfall over the next 18 months.

Council members spent most of the meeting discussing areas in which the city can bring in more revenue through collection of bad debts and the request that contractors reduce their bills by 10 percent.

"Most of the contractors have shown a willingness to step forward," City Administrative Officer Miguel Santana said, estimating the city might see as much as a $15 million return on the $150 million in contracts the city has for this year.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. No since it was 'taken' for an easement by the city.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. So, basically after the next big quake y'all are screwed?
That is such a weird ruling - considering you live in quake country.

Perhaps the City Council should consider a 10% cut from their pay and benefits -- chop from the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blueworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, it was the law in NJ for decades
The towns do have an easement on a certain number of feet from the center line of the road. I found this out when a utility company started cutting down trees in my front yard (bass turds). Anyway, the sidewalks - condition of repair & snow removal - were always the responsibility of the homeowner in most towns ever since I was a kid. I'm currently a geezer:) This might be best for all concerned because in the last town I lived in, the city workers were best at plowing down mailboxes & gouging out landscaping. Good grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bonhomme Richard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
45. That's right and the curb too. Our curb was getting bad and we were going to ...
replace it so we called the town to see what the deal was. We lucked out. They said to forget about it because they were repairing the whole street. Lucky guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
4. Then I should have the right to put up a tollbooth to recoup my costs.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Best idea, yet! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. That's great! If I 'own' it I don't see why not. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
36. You wouldn't recoup them: Nobody walks in LA.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Here the homeowner has to repair the sidewalks that are
marked by the city for repair. Also in the next city, the homeowner is assessed for road replacement. Don't know how they get away with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not where I live, in CT. We even have snow removed from the sidewalks by the town.
We have repairs done by our town and have never had to pay for anything. That is crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
7. Being from back east, snow clearance was always the homeowners repsonsibility
on the sidewalks, and if you didn't do it, you could be fined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. It's that way everywhere I have lived in the Midwest. Snow removal is the homeowners responsiblity
and you have to do it within 48 hours or some such or there is a fine. If the city has to come do it, there is another fine, plus labor for them doing the snow removal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hlthe2b Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. As it is in Denver... but haphazard compliance at best...
Edited on Fri Mar-05-10 02:41 PM by hlthe2b
There are stretches of sidewalk in residential areas-- that don't get direct sun-- that have remained frozen choppy ice for two months now. Fun when you come across these stretches at night, walking the dog.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
27. That's how it is where I live but we don't have to do our own repairs.
I think if I have to repair the sidewalks I should be able to keep people off my sidewalk. After all, all those people walking on it takes a toll and adds to my expenses for which they contribute nada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RockaFowler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why then do we pay taxes??
My God, what is up with these cities?? We can't even plant anything in the swale at our house.


My one big question to all of these cities out of money - What exactly happened to all of the money you were getting when all of these home values were going up?? It's the same here in Florida. Those counties were living high on the hog when the Real Estate Boom was going on. Now, they are cutting everything. Why didn't they take care of things when the money was still there?? It is so unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
28. Did you think your tax money was for things the citizens need? Silly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grand Taurean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
40. The municipal governments reassess home values
during the boom times to rake in as much cash as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clowncar Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
9. How can the city make homeowners pay for something that the city claims is city property?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
10. I've never lived in a home where the sidewalk NEEDed repair
I bet the bricks in front of my house are over 50 years old. Maybe over 100 years. My house was built in 1887. I was gonna replace some of the bricks, but the city wanted me to get a $15 permit just for the privilege of fixing up my sidewalk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. Well, good for you. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllyCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Our town has a contractor they use (no choice for us) but we have to pay the bill
We were lucky that all our stones are so far intact, but it was like $250 a section for everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grand Taurean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is "Eminent BullS**T"
The government can claim to have the rights to first 6 feet of your property yet you are responsible for it.
It is this kind of nonsense that gets people angry at the government.
From experience the local bureaucrats are the worst. Sometimes there is no difference between the two parties on the local level.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. They don't fix the sidewalks very often anyway
I doubt that will save them much bucks, if any. Try walking through Hollywood or downtown LA without tripping on fucked up sidewalks as it is! sheesh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh, this ought to work out REALLY nicely for wheelchair users
:sarcasm: :sarcasm: :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1gobluedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yes, in Ann Arbor sidewalk repairs are the homeowner's responsiblity
The city will come and tell you what needs to be fixed, give you a certain amount of time to fix it, then fine you if you haven't. Same with snow removal, you can be ticketed if it isn't cleared in 24 hours.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhpgetsit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
18. Generally we homeowners are responsible for keeping it clear of debris and snow
But I think if it were my responsibility to repair big holes and cracks, I would simply post a sign saying not responsible for any person injured on this broken sidewalk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. I know in the 50s when they were still building them here and there
the homeowner was assessed a certain amount on his taxes to pay for their installation, one reason my own parents would never consider buying a corner property.

Requiring homeowners to repair them is asking for trouble, though. Consider the lack of masonry skills among the average Harry Homeowner to figure out why, and you can bet Harry will try to do it a bucket of cement at a time on Saturday mornings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #19
32. And Harry's the one who will get sued when someone trips over the patch.
Win-win for the city.:sarcasm:

The whole notion of treating sidewalks like a special enhancement is ridiculously antiquated, as are the laws in Snowbelt areas expecting individual owners to shovel the sidewalks in front of their properties. You and I both saw how ridiculous that was in Boston-- every few feet the terrain changed as you navigated from one lot to the next. Joe Schmoe shoveled off the whole sidewalk, Jack Sprat shoveled only a narrow pathway, and both of them piled snow on the edges of the curb cut. It would be so much better for all concerned if the cities/towns plowed the sidewalks right after plowing the streets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. Here...it's always been the responsibility of the homeowner n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. I believe Chicago splits the cost 50-50.

But I haven't needed it on the crosswalk yet. There is another walk out to the road that has sunken. But I could probably just lift it and shove some fill under it (item #132 on my to-do list).

The winter gifted me with a pothole behind my garage. I am seriously thinking of patching it myself as I suspect alley potholes are going to be low, lower, lowest priority for fixing.

And really, what's wrong with pitching in and actually doing some of the work ourselves when we can? Growing up on a farm, my dad plowed the entire road we lived on every snowfall. Most farmers do. Of course, technically we owned about half of that as well. In Indiana homeowners own the half of the road on their side. As we owned both sides of half the length of the road, we owned the entire road for that stretch.

Having inherited a bit of it, I now pay property taxes on this public road! I gather they tax that particular portion at a massively reduced rate. But I was told they do tax it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #22
38. legally they are yours, but there is a 50/50 program.
ours got done out of the alderman's menu money. but we were about to pay to do it, because they were in bad shape. i think we might have qualified for 50/50 at the time, but iirc, it is needs based.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jamastiene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
23. I will fight anyone who tries to put a sidewalk in the midst of my triffids.
Edited on Fri Mar-05-10 02:42 PM by Jamastiene
I'll aim my other triffids and my fire ants and all the other biting, stinging, horrible, wretched, tough, impossible to kill shit in the jungle that is my back yard at them.

They'll leave my jungle alone unless they want a naturally occurring (I think) biological war with Mother Nature on their hands. I already signed a treaty with Mother Nature that I'll find some way to live (or die) amidst this jungle I call home and I fully intend to defend my little hovel and all my triffids.

Kinda, I mean I can't kill them. Might as well learn to live with them. So far, so good. *audible GULP* Knock on wood.


I welcome my triffid overlords.

They are not making me type this, really they aren't.


:scared:

HELP ME!!!



As far as those cheap asses running LA, damn them. I'm glad I don't live there. If I did, they could bite me. I got shit in my yard that'll bite them back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeytherat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. You don't mess with the triffids. Ever.


mikey_the_rat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughBeaumont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
25. So how's come if I have people over and a car is straddling the sidewalk, it gets ticketed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yes, I have. When I lived in Detroit. I think I paid somewhere
around 6k. I was disgusted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
29. Get off my sidewalk, you rotten kids!
No roller skating on my sidewalk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #29
41. I know - does this mean you can put a chain-link fence around
YOUR section of the sidewalk to prevent wear and tear??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. I was thinking more about claymores on the lawn facing the
sidewalk. Much more effective. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
31. Here in CA cities can legally force the homeowner to repair a sidewalk
through what is known as a hazard abatement program. They can declare the sidewalk a hazard and hold a public hearing and if the homeowner fails to object (or if he objects and is overruled by the City Council) repairs are done by the city and billed to the homeowner to be paid with property taxes. This is nothing new, the law enabling these procedures has been in effect since 1911.

The reason cities do this is to shift the liability for injuries that may arise from a damaged sidewalk. And preserve their dwindling street repair funds to actually repair streets.

You may object to this if you are the owner of a damaged sidewalk but why should I pay taxes to repair your sidewalk if my sidewalk is OK.

On the other hand, none of us gets to decide whether or not we actually WANT a sidewalk in front of our property, so should we be forced to repair it?

Obviously, since a ginormous city like Los Angeles has gone for 99 years without enforcing the hazard abatement process, there is not an easy answer to the question. It's a matter of local policy. And you can bet that cash strapped cities are looking under every rock for every penny they can scratch up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
33. Yes I have. Here in many California cities responsibility fall on the home owner...
for the up-keep of the side walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lil Missy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
34. That's the way it has always been here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Diadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
35. That's normal around here.
Sometimes, depending on local ordinances, the "powers that be" will reimburse a portion of the entire cost of replacement. I think our town offers something like 25%-33%.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Renew Deal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
39. That's the way it is in NY.
Homeowners must maintain their sidewalks. If someone reports a crack, an inspector will come and basically give you a summons saying that sidewalks need to be repaired by a certain date or there will be fines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
42. If you can't raise taxes, you cut services nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
etherealtruth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
43. In metro Detroit it is the property owners responsibility
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC