Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hugo Boss stands by their decision to close Brooklyn plant (OH)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 01:30 AM
Original message
Hugo Boss stands by their decision to close Brooklyn plant (OH)
Posted: 8:40 PM

BROOKLYN, Ohio - Hugo Boss is standing by their decision to close their Brooklyn facility, insisting that the plant is not globally competitive.

A statement issued by the company Friday stated, "Hugo Boss tried in vain to find ways to make it (the plant) globally competitive and when that effort failed, we acted in the best interests of shareholders and customers by deciding to close the facility."

The company has met with city and state officials, as well as the Union representing its maintenance workers in order to provide severance packages and other transitional assistance to the workers affected by the April closure.

The Union which represents the facility’s 300 production workers rejected the company’s offer to talk about similar issues.

The company said they will continue to pay wages until April 27, 2010, even if production halts prior to that date. The company said they also intend to offer outplacement and professional reorientation training for all employees to smooth their transition.

The workers of Hugo Boss are still hoping that the company will change their mind about closing the facility. So is the city of Brooklyn, which stands to lose $120,000 in income taxes if the company moves.

http://www.newsnet5.com/dpp/news/hugo-boss-stands-by-their-decision-to-close-brooklyn-plant

"plant is not globally competitive" = workers refused to work for peanuts.

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 01:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. Well now they won't work at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Travis_0004 Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 01:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why don't we just throw out NAFTA, and get some good old fashoned Tarrifs in place.
I don't have a PHD in economics, so maybe in reality it wouldn't work, but I think somebody smarter than me needs to start doing some research. Products made in China will never be cheaper, unless there is a cost to import them. Even a small tarrif would probably be enough to make China less attractive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HeresyLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. China has nothing to do with NAFTA
NAFTA is Canada, the US and Mexico.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FarCenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #4
10. In this case it is eastern Europe
Workers United said Hugo Boss told labor leaders early in negotiations that it wanted to move suit production to low-wage plants in Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria.

"The only plan they offered to save the plant was a one year trial experiment which was grounded in the reduction of wages by 35 percent - from $12.80 an hour to $8.30 an hour," Workers United said in its rally flier.


http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2009/12/hugo_boss_to_close_brooklyn_pl.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CaliforniaPeggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
3. I am so sorry to hear this...
What a nasty blow...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happy Hippy Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. ....it's sad.
People have to realize that without a college education in the US - you are screwed. Even all of the coffee pouring gigs have been taken by english, sociology, and philosophy majors!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 02:06 AM
Response to Original message
6. It sounds as though they really did try, but by law, they have to make the
greatest profit possible for their shareholders.

Compared to other companies, they seem to be doing a lot to help with the transition.

As much as it sucks, this doesn't sound like just another greedy corporation - this sounds like a company who actually cares about the workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 02:47 AM
Response to Original message
7. Our elected representives won't help citizens
Why won't our congress and senate reps stop this? Workers in our country are going under.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indy Lurker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. You are correct.


"plant is not globally competitive" = workers elsewhere are less expensive

Notice it did nit say "plant is not profitable"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm betting it would begin to look
pretty 'globally competitive' if field leveling tariffs were imposed on all imported merch from 3rd world countries.....but wait, that possibility has already been nullified by trade agreements signed by Democrats against the will of the people...oh well, good thing those laid off workers can still change oil and give haircuts...the new American economy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC