Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UAF researchers' methane discovery could change climate equation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 11:56 AM
Original message
UAF researchers' methane discovery could change climate equation

http://newsminer.com/view/full_story/6570195/article-UAF-researchers--methane-discovery-could-change-climate-equation-?instance=home_lead_story


A research team led by a pair of University of Alaska Fairbanks scientists has made a surprising and potentially troubling discovery — a vast section of the Arctic Ocean is emitting millions of tons of methane gas.

The findings, which were published in today’s edition of the journal Science, could have significant implications for climate change projections. Methane is among the most potent of the greenhouse gases, which most scientists believe are responsible for a recent spike in global temperatures.

-snip-

“The baseline for these emissions should be zero,” said Natalia Shakhova, a UAF research scientists who helped lead the project.
-snip-
-----------------------------


its too late


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. I read about the methane over a year ago.
Maybe this is the first time they have proof the gas that was predicted to escape IS escaping. Gonna kill us all, isn't it? Oh, well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd have liked a statement saying that
previous research in the area showed that none was escaping.

"'The baseline for these emissions should be zero,' said Natalia Shakhova, a UAF research scientists who helped lead the project" doesn't say that. I've learned to be careful in my assumptions; if somebody doesn't state something that should be obvious but which only takes a sentence, there's often a good reason for it. (Just what that reason is usually remains a mystery; at times, it's been because the simple statement would be false, and at others it's just trivially true.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC