Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bob Corker sucks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 05:33 PM
Original message
Bob Corker sucks
FedEx Ally Corker Blocks Aviation Measure in Fight With UPS
By John Hughes


March 6 (Bloomberg) -- Senator Bob Corker, who represents FedEx Corp.’s home state of Tennessee, is blocking aviation- funding legislation over the prospect that language may be added later helping unions organize at the company.

Corker’s action extends a years-long fight in Washington between the mostly non-union FedEx and its unionized rival United Parcel Service Inc. over how workers at both companies should be treated under U.S. labor laws. The dispute is over a measure reauthorizing funds for the Federal Aviation Administration.

“We are supportive of the Senate FAA bill, but we have placed a hold until we can be assured that the controversial FedEx provision will not be included in the final legislation,” Laura Lefler Herzog, a spokeswoman for Corker, a Republican, said today in an e-mailed statement.

A version of the $53.5 billion measure passed by the House last year would place the FedEx workers under the same federal labor law that covers UPS workers represented by the Teamsters union. That law lets workers vote locally to join unions rather than being forced to conduct a national union election. .........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a9y_22VIwD9o&pos=7



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, wonder how much he gets for doing this? Better than a lobbyist! Fuck him.
rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-07-10 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. So bush didn't add SIGNING STATEMENTS
to practically, every single bill he signed. So if they want to change or add something, ON ANY BILL, they will. This is stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC