Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WENDELL POTTER: ".........I would vote for it (senate HCR Bill). ...."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:49 PM
Original message
WENDELL POTTER: ".........I would vote for it (senate HCR Bill). ...."
Jus sayin, nough said no?


http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/03052010/transcript5.html


Or is Wendell Potter a corporatist too?


Yes, I realize it's not perfect but 7 more years of Obama and I think it it'll get better...


TIA for any input
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Self, kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Really, 3 kicks?! No input?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. because Potter made the case so completely
that I can't think of any way to improve upon what he said.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. I saw that too, but it's bound to get wild disagreement here at DU.
InTrade places the odds about 50/50: http://www.newser.com/story/82516/odds-of-health-care-bill-passing-about-50-50.html

(Newser) – Nate Silver notes that the folks at InTrade now say the smart money is on President Obama getting his health care bill through Congress. They put the chances at 52%, a significant jump in just the last few days. Silver agrees the odds have improved from a "post- Masspocalypse" low of 25% to 30%, but after running through all the pros (Obama's "all-in") and cons (Bart Stupak isn't budging on abortion), he's keeping his seat squarely on the fence.

"My head says yes—Pelosi will squeak this through—while my gut frankly says no. Either way, I'm not sure there's a lot of arbitrage against that 52% number at Intrade, but I'd hesitate to call the bill a favorite to pass," he writes at FiveThirtyEight.com.


I think that if Dems pass nothing at all you can stick a fork in them this fall because they will be done. The Republican crowing about how they stopped this terrible, terrible bill will be heard round the world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow, 2 kicks....so are folk putting Potter on the corporatist list also? TIA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SalviaBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R thanks for posting. That's good news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lbjdem Donating Member (5 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. You could at least mention Dr. Marcia Angell
was on the same show and made the argument against the bill. I agree with her and disagree with Wendell Potter. There are some good things in the bill, like Medicaid Expansion and supposedly ending rescission, but you can do those things without giving health insurance companies $100B a year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I give Potter more credibility due to his work AGAINST the HCI's as an insider
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Or you could say Dr. Angell has known the problem for many years
and spoke in favor of a national system to cover Everyone, instead of leaving 23 million out as the Senate bill does.

While I appreciate Wendell Potter speaking out in the last year, for years he worked in an industry that killed and bankrupted people by denying claims.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. I know plenty of people who weren't insiders fighting the HCI's who "knew" that the system was screw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CreekDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Dr. Angell said that the current system needs to unravel faster and this bill will slow that
maddening!

i'd believe that she's arguing in good faith if she drops her own health insurance, but i'm not holding my breath.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. Really? Is it easier to call what is happening a bail out?! WTF?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. K, so we're gonna hate on Potter too?!?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Dr. Angell recognized the problem years ago and never profited from
the insurance companies, why dismiss what she said?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:49 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Potter was an insider who is fighting against the HCI's, that has a lot more credibility with me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:53 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Why, because he did not recognize the problem for close to two decades...
I'm happy he is speaking out Now, but what happening ten years ago?

What about the people who were smart enough to see the problem early, they get pushed aside?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. It's easy to recognize that there's a problem to rail against as an insider takes more courage IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Whatever, some people can be right for decades and never receive
any praise, others can finally wake up and in a year see all the praise.

Just a thought.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Not sayin she shouldn't receive recognition but who didnt know US HC was bad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Who put their career on the line and fought for the people for years...
that is the question.

I would rather back Dr. Angell who recognized and spoke out to change the problem years ago vs. someone who was wrong for years, not saying he does not deserve credit now.

Just that we should not dismiss someone who has been right all along.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. Not dismissing her just think, in the face of credibility, Potter has more in my view
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:45 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. Go for it, I'd rather put my money on the person who was right for
decades...just my preference.

:hi:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Being able to identify the problem is a big part of the solution. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
24. Kicking, this is important IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
25. Reluctantly.
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 11:24 AM by Gormy Cuss
That's the context. He doesn't like this bill because there is no public option.

BILL MOYERS: So Wendell, you reluctantly are going to support this bill?

WENDELL POTTER: I would.

BILL MOYERS: What don't you like about it?

WENDELL POTTER: I don't like the fact that it doesn't include the public option. That was so much a part of the House bill, even though it was watered down. It was a good thing to have included, and I regret that. And I hope that maybe in future years, Congress can revisit that. And I think they will, if they're seeing that the reform doesn't work as envisioned.

BILL MOYERS: So you would say yes, and then fight again for another day to make it better.

WENDELL POTTER: I would vote for it. Is it the be all and end all? No, it's not. There are other things that I think will have to come back in years to come. But wouldn't you rather, and I think wouldn't most Americans rather that we have something to start from rather than starting from scratch the next time? It's very hard to build up to doing this in the first place. And keep in mind that the special interests have almost an unlimited amount of money to spend to influence the results. I'm frankly pretty amazed that we're getting this close to passing something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
26. K&R and thank you Mr. Potter. Kucinich is sooo progressive...
He's aligned with the GOP on this issue. He's left all other progressives behind.

Thank Mr. Potter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC