Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anyone else think UP should have won best picture?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:08 PM
Original message
Anyone else think UP should have won best picture?
I get the whole political nonsense around both Avatar and Hurt Locker, but UP was quite simply one of the best films of all time. Anyone else have gripes about last night? (Other than wondering how Sandra Bullock won best actress, yikes.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. One good opening scene, the rest was rather boring.
Kind of like Saving Private Ryan.

Definitely not the best picture of the year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CBGLuthier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, and I really liked District 9 a lot.
Avatar won for cinematography which was nonsense. CGI generated material should not count as being photographed.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
15. Cinematography I underestand actually
The basics of film, angles, camera movement, all of the little directing details still apply to even a CGI scene. From that perspective, Avatar was a tour de force. It was everything else about Avatar I wasn't impressed with.

District 9 was amazing. Best Sci-Fi in the last 5 years easily. No way it could get the award for best picture though. Low budget films don't win best picture or sponsors go away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. I really enjoyed UP. Surprised it didn't win anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It won best animated feature and soundtrack. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJazz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Now I REALLY feel like an idiot, I thought the OP was talking about...
.."Up in the Air"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryOldDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, I do...and I'm glad it won for best animated film.
I figured it didn't stand a chance for Best Picture. I didn't see it until it came out on DVD because I thought I wouldn't like it (people insisted I watch it). I loved it, and it has such a message that every once in awhile you just want to take it out and watch it again.

Have you noticed that the creator wears the bottlecap badge on his lapel? I noticed it at the Globes and again last night.

And, yes, I was disappointed at Bullock winning -- Gaby's performance went beyond acting in Precious, and she deserved recognition for that. I hope this is just the beginning of a great career for her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. For a first timer, a nomination isn't bad
But it's Hollywood. There are a very limited number of roles someone with her body type will get in movies. This was probably her only real chance at an Oscar. I would have been just fine with it if they handed the Oscar to Gaby, and I hope she doesn't get typecast into oblivion from here on out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. No
Honestly...I think The Wrestler should of won this year. It was better than all the movies this year and last year. The committee should of voted to amend their rules so they don't have to award a steaming pile of dog feces
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. No
No, I don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'm good with it being best animated picture.
I don't think it had the "wow factor" of 'Avatar'. Haven't seen 'The Hurt Locker', so I'll leave that alone.

(Boy what a sad movie UP was at the beginning. When I read the article about the little girl who had the terminal illness, and hung on barely long enough to see UP, it made me tear up quite a bit. I hope the film didn't make her sad like it did me.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. Avatar was a fantastic film, esp in 3-d.But the subj was too anti-imperialistic for the academy. nt
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 02:27 PM by rhett o rick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
11. I saw up and saw Blind Side - I would pick Blind Side -
I thought Sandra Bullock should win Best actress as soon as I saw the trailer before the film was released. This was a Great film and she played her part with greatness. This reminded me of Sally Field in Norma Rae -
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slampoet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
12. I can explain how Sandra Bullock won her Oscar.

It all comes down to the idea that the Oscars have a tendency to spread the Oscars around and also like to recognize veteran actors when it is "Their turn" to win especially after a long career or after they have been passed up for movies they should have won the Oscar for in years past (think Russel Crowe getting the award for Gladiator when he really should have won for The Insider the year before, or think of Jeff Bridges who should have won for the Last Picture Show or Fearless or a dozen other films where he was better than this year)


First off in the nomination process a few deserving actresses were passed up for nominations which isn't so bad since you can only pick 5. I personally thought Maya Rudolph should have been nominated for Away We Go (though she wouldn't have won either.)

Second two of the best actress nominees were first timers, Carey Mulligan and Gabourey Sidibe. First time nominees can win for best supporting actress but rarely win for lead actress especially when they are young like these two.

Next is Helen Mirren who has won an Oscar recently and she was nominated for a film that no one actually saw. So she had very little chance of winning.

Finally is Meryl Streep who has been nominated 16 times and won twice. She was also almost a supporting actress in Julie and Julia. I loved here in this but she has had a lot of recognition.



So by process of elimination here is Sandra Bullock with her flawed Southern accent winning the Oscar. Not really the best performance, but it was the choice the voters made given their particular prejudices.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NobleCynic Donating Member (991 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Makes sense as a political decision within the academy
I've just never really been a fan of anything with Sandra Bullock. Hmm... missed Away We Go. Maybe I'll have to check it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brickbat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
13. No -- its anti-war, anti-corporatist message clashed with its colonial righteousness in a way that
the Academy clearly, and understandably, found threatening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC