Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dennis Kucinich is a patriot

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:36 PM
Original message
Dennis Kucinich is a patriot
I find it amusing that a lot of people are blaming him for our problems, when the Democratic Party leadership has never listened to him anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. The party-liners love to blame someone.
Kucinich is an easy target for them, as he is so different: principled, liberal and unweavering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. for me its the alien thing, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. If someone in DC stands with people over corporations, I could
not care less about what they have seen in the skies, or what they believe. I know a helluva lot of the schmucks in DC believe in a sky man with a beard who can hear their thoughts and other goofy stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vadawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. yup for you its the guy in the sky, for me its the alien thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Not a lot of difference between the two as far as I'm concerned
Both are nuts, but at the end of the day, if either one is fighting for the common citizen, I couldn't care any less what goofy religion or pseudo-scientific beliefs that they have in their own lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. It's not a deal-breaker for me.
I look at where they stand. Are they with the people or with the corporations, it is that simple. The rest is background noise, including who they sleep with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #23
113. If you're going to smear someone for something they said
you should make sure you are accurate in your 'reporting'.

Kucinich never said he saw any aliens. Sad to see the lie repeated here. He said he saw something in the sky that he could not identify. I have seen things in the sky that were not identifiable, hundreds of thousands, maybe millions of people have.

Do you know the difference between 'Unidentifiable' and 'Alien'? I know that rightwingers are careless about such distinctions when they call a Democrat like Kucinich 'crazy' but I would expect more from someone on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theFrankFactor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #113
176. Sad Isn't It? I've Learned So Much About My Party Since Obama...
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 08:36 PM by theFrankFactor
There are people we stand shoulder to shoulder with who practice the same blind allegiance that we saw with Bush. Kucinich is now a "grand stander" and "selfish" and "believes in aliens". This is what any one of us has to look forward to if we ran on principals and strength. I guess that's why so many Democrats are worthless, spineless shills. Gotta go along to get along.

Yeah Dennis, stand on principals and push hard for what most of us actually want and you're a kook. Fuckin' sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #176
185. It is sad. I'm learning a lot too about this party I supported
and fought for for so long. I'm learning how hypocritical people on 'our side' are. I remember when some of the same people loved Kucinich. It seems it's all about politics and not about what I always thought it was about after all. I remember rightwingers calling me naive for standing up for Democrats, telling me they were everything I accused Republicans of. I'm now thinking maybe they had a point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bryn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #113
181. Thank You!
#1000000000

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
155. quit acting like an alien.....
the bill stinks no matter what planet you are on!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
29. What fucking alien thing?
That he admitted he saw a UFO? That disinformation about that encounter was spread far and wide? At least you didn't drag out the moonbeam mccrazypants name calling.

He is one of few who actually match their actions to what they say. Personally that is worth more than anything.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:09 AM
Response to Reply #29
55. yep
he never said he saw an alien.

But who cares, it sounds nutty!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #29
114. Thank you for correcting the misinformation. He never said
he saw 'aliens' but that doesn't stop them. Funny how Democrats, or people who say they are Democrats adapt the lies of the right to go after a real Democrat. I remember rightwingers using the exact same lies about Kucinich when he was going after Bush. At least you'd think Democrats could invent their own lies. It's pretty sickening to see them attack a good Democrat using rightwing lies and smears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #114
156. +100
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:17 PM
Response to Reply #114
165. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. sure it is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
45. For me it's the obvious mind control
over astounding 6' tall women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #45
96. 6ft redheads can control me any day...
well my wife is a redhead and 5'10" and she`s been doing it for 37 yrs....
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #96
111. That was a good one, madrchsod!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #45
125. There is that to consider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #45
142. With an entire congress and white house controlled by corporations for Bad, I don't
care if it's redheads, Jesus, crack or Powdermilk Biscuits that gives this man the personal integrity to stand up for the People. Let's order a round of redheads for everyone if that's what it takes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #142
147. DONE!!! I''ll take a double!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theFrankFactor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #142
179. + infinity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #45
145. LOL!
:rofl::hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #145
148. YO!!!
Swamp Rat Is in the thread!!!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #2
107. My pop swore he saw a UFO when flying Radar planes in the Navy.
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 01:41 PM by YOY
Never reported it. His crewmates saw it too. Moved rapidly at a highspeed and changed trajectory without slowing down. They asked their CO and he said to just ingnore it as it would just get them laughed at. They knew what they saw though.

Pretty much what Dennis saw from the ground. He never claimed he saw an alien.

So is my dad some kind of nut too?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #107
133. Yeah. He just said he saw an unidentified flying object. I guess if he could identify it, he
wouldn't have said he'd seen a UFO.

UFOs do not mean alien spaceships!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #2
112. What 'alien' thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #112
136. Koonch said he saw a UFO once.
Of course to little minds that means he claimed he was abducted and probed by greys and told the secret recipe to the Colonel's chicken.

IT'S PEOPLE!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #136
168. Lol, yes, I knew he had said he saw something in the sky
he could not identify, but I never heard of him saying he saw 'aliens' ~ lol! Guess he didn't after all!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howmad1 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:29 PM
Original message
Saw Aliens!
Bullshit. There's not an alien in this entire universe who would be interested in visiting this fucked up planet. Maybe that's why SETI hasn't heard a peep out of ET's. They have little to no interest in communicating with idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tiny elvis Donating Member (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #112
158. vadawg thinks that kucinich is an alien
i think that is an accurate interpretation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:14 PM
Response to Reply #158
171. If only it were true! This country is badly in need
of some extraordinary intervention. Sticking to principles and telling the truth is pretty alien to DC so in that sense, you could say Kucinich is an alien in today's political climate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Division helps no one.
Ever wonder why the 2 parties spread hate toward the Greens instead of having the Dems and Greens work in coordination?

Do these values sound closer to R or D? (Green's platform)

Grassroots Democracy

Social justice and equal opportunity

ecological wisdom

non-violence

decentralization

community based economics and economic justice

feminism and gender equality

respect for diversity

personal and global responsibility

future focus and sustainability

Now I would like to suggest that the Ds and Gs work together. Instead of creating a wedge between the two parties by hateful rhetoric, perhaps a constructive dialogue would be more appropriate. It would seem to me that the hateful right is creating and perpetuating this division to support their own evil agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #10
84. +1
but working together to accomplish important projects always makes senseO8)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #10
124. Absolutely they should be working together! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedstDem Donating Member (356 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
108. Lol
"Unweavering" just made me laugh, I don't know why. Look out, he's taking apart your sweater!!...
sry, couldn't resist.

I think you are spot on about Dennis, love him!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. You are an irrelvant idiot
but we really need you, please help us...yeah that is going to work out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
47. Makes as much sense as the message to liberals:
STFU and be sure to vote for us in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatchWhatISay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
5. I have never voted for him even though he has always made the most sense to me
But I will not support any health care bill until it gets his OK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kratos12 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
6. Then so is Nader
The problem, and it's a big one, that both have is that they think that to effect change you have to go from point A to point Z in one step or allow the other side to take power and make things worse.

If Dennis helps in killing HCR he will be taking this country farther away from the very policies he wants the nation to adopt, by handing the right wing a win and insuring that they return to power, maybe as soon as this fall.

Amazing that any rational adult can see the killing of the Democrat's centerpiece policy issue as a good thing, but maybe like Nader and the teabaggers he must share the POV that before anything good can happen the country must first suffer horribly and then "come to it's senses" and see things exactly like he does.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 08:56 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Nader did not fuck up the 2000 election
That is a stupid DLC myth.

Gore and Bush did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. It was stolen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #21
93. yep, Nader just made the theft easier and the supremes made it unconstitutional. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #93
117. The Supreme Court stole the 2000 election.
Nader had nothing to do with it. They didn't do it alone, the theft began when they started scrubbing people from the voting rolls and the myriad other crimes that were committed to make sure Bush won, which was going to happen no matter what. When all the other efforts failed, the USSC stepped in and finished the job.

Stop protecting Republicans and the USSC from being held accountable for the biggest crime in our history by making the ridiculous claim that 'Nader did it'. He had no influence at all on that election. We got no justice for that crime, but at least it needs to go down in history for what it was. You and the handful of people who harbor such hatred for Nader are contributing to denying future generations the right to know the truth about that crime.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #117
120. Nader delivered Florida to the Republicans.
He offered it up to the Supreme Court intervention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #120
135. No, keep repeating the lie. He did no such thing.
And no matter how many times you repeat it, it will not be true. The facts contradict you. I can't imagine why Democrats want to protect Republicans, as they have done since the theft of the election, from the consequences of their crime.

Repeating talking points with no substance means nothing. 'Nader did it'. How did he do it?

Make a case for your claim, I am more than happy to prove you wrong, with facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #135
153. The lie is that Nader did not deliver Florida to the Republicans. We don't
know how much he conspired directly with Republicans to throw the election in Florida and we possibly never will.

Nader campaigned in Florida when he'd been asked not to, when he knew it would be a close race. He deliberately threw the election to Republicans--what's so difficult about that?

It would taken 9 more votes in each county in Florida for Gore to have won, despite everything that happened. I don't think you'll find a Democrat in Florida who doesn't personally know 9 Nader voters in their county that are Democrats. Nader delivered around 12,000 votes that would have gone to Gore to Bush.

Florida is an expensive state to run in, both in time and in dollars spent. By forcing Gore to spend more time and money in liberal states because of Nader's presence, Gore was left with less to spend in swing states like Florida.

Nader threw the election to Bush-Cheney--just like Perot did to Clinton in 1992.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #153
159. I can find you plenty of Democrats in Florida who voted for Bush.
That argument has been debunked so many times I don't know why you bother. Why did so many Democrats vote for Bush? Those votes would have pushed Gore over the top also.

But now I see you are adding more speculation to the 'Nader did it' myth. There is not a shred of evidence that Nader 'conspired with Republicans' to 'throw the election to Bush'. Not one tiny hint.

The Democrats lost the election because Republicans stole it. They prevented legitimate voters, mostly poor and black, from voting. Have you forgotten Harris who was rewarded with a seat in Congress for her crime?

A crime of massive proportions, treason actually, was committed in that election. And the Democrats did nothing about it. In fact, they were silent or like you, they tried to shift the blame away from the criminals.


None Dare Call It Treason

In the December 12 ruling by the US Supreme Court handing the election to George Bush, the Court committed the unpardonable sin of being a knowing surrogate for the Republican Party instead of being an impartial arbiter of the law.


That is who is responsible for the stolen election of 2000.

As Vincent Bugliosi says and I agree:

These five Justices, by their conduct, have forfeited the right to be respected, and only by treating them the way they deserve to be treated can we demonstrate our respect for the rule of law they defiled, and insure that their successors will not engage in similarly criminal conduct.

Why, one may ask, have I written this article? I'll tell you why. I'd like to think, like most people, that I have a sense of justice. In my mind's eye, these five Justices have gotten away with murder, and I want to do whatever I can to make sure that they pay dearly for their crime. Though they can't be prosecuted, I want them to know that there's at least one American out there (and hopefully many more because of this article) who knows (not thinks, but knows) precisely who they are. I want these five Justices to know that because of this article, which I intend to send to each one of them by registered mail, there's the exponential possibility that when many Americans look at them in the future, they'll be saying, "Why are these people in robes seated above me? They all belong behind bars." I want these five Justices to know that this is America, not a banana republic, and in the United States of America, you simply cannot get away with things like this.


Gore WON! He won the popular vote and he would have won Florida had the vote counting not been stopped. Nader had nothing to do with it.

Bugliosi's book should be required reading for every American student of history so that they are not led to believe the myth that anyone other than rightwing ideologues Scalia, Thomas, Sandra Day O'Connor, Rehnquist and Kennedy were responsible for the theft of the 2000 election. They should go down in history in infamy.

Bush was never elected to the WH. Both elections were stolen. And no one should be allowed to forget that or to shift the blame to someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #159
196. Without Nader, there is no Supreme Court involvement.
Nader threw the election to Bush and he did it with full knowledge of what he was doing. If you watched Ralph Nader during the 2000 elections, he had gotten caught up in the wonder of being a media celebrity and just couldn't give that up, whether it was the right thing for the country or not.

You say you know Florida Democrats who voted for Bush? Who told them over and over that there was no difference between Bush and Gore? NADER.

Who campaigned specifically in Florida, a perennial swing state, to say that to Florida Democrats? NADER.

Yes, Gore did win Florida. As one who lives in Florida, I'm rather aware of that.

However, Ralph Nader siphoned off probably 12,000-15,000 votes that would have gone to Gore. The authorities in Florida did all they could to swing the election, but there's only so much you can do without it being obvious that you're stealing votes.

Ralph Nader took care of the rest--campaigning, belittling Gore, and taking Gore votes.

Nader swung the 2000 election to Bush, before it ever even reached the Florida Supreme Court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #117
151. I don't hate Nader I just happen to think he was instrumental in the theft. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #151
163. You are free to think that , but your wrong. The SC dealt the final
blow to a long, pre-meditated effort by Republicans using various nefarious means, such as scrubbing minority voters from the roles at the request of the Bush campaign to hand the election to Bush. When, despite all their efforts, Gore still won, and he did, the SC stepped in to finish the job. Seem my post above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:27 PM
Response to Reply #163
166. I don't dispute that and agree with what you've stated but feel that
if Nader had not been in the race, splitting the votes, it would not have been such a close call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #166
167. Well, I don't want to rehash the argument all over again
but I think it has been pretty much proven that regardless of the votes he got, Gore won anyhow and would have won had the vote counting not be stopped. We will never know by how much. And if so many Democratic voters had not been prevented from voting, that would have a made a difference also. These were all illegal acts aimed at stealing an election. Nader did nothing illegal so I never understood the attempt to blame him when it is clear that with or without him in the race, the election would have been close because of the corruption, and the SC would have handed it to Bush. The anger seems very misplaced to me.

The 2004 election was stolen also. Nader was not a factor in that theft either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #167
173. you present a cogent argument and make me rethink my stand. My logic
has failed to consider that indeed, Nader had every right to run and did nothing illegal. My blame for the theft has been misplaced, TY. :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #173
180. That is a very honest and admirable thing for you to say.
It is very rare for someone to be so open-minded so thank you.

To be honest I was so frightened of Bush winning in 2004 that I was angry at Nader for running even though I knew he had a right to do so. But I was afraid that once again, the Republicans would try to steal the election. Still, angry as I was at him, I could never blame him for what happened in 2000.

Again, thank you ~ :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #180
197. it's just nice to have a discussion without being belittled by the other party for being
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 10:51 AM by arthritisR_US
thick headed. I do appreciate reasoned debate with a measure of patience which you have in spades, TY mate :-)

edited for a typo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #117
187. Well said! //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
157. +100
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Problem with this is, this bill is what is taking HCR farther away from
what he wants this nation to adoopt. This bill places HC even more firmly in the hands of for-profit insurance, even to the point of so-called subsidies for the poor, which is taxes going directly to the insurance companies, collect $200 as you pass go - THEY set the fees, and if the person can't pony up, the government does. Where is the downward pressure on costs there?

The corporate wing of the democratic party may consider this the centerpiece, but it was written by the industry, not by the politicians. Isn't that what we so recently screamed about the Republicans doing?

You want to see something horrible happen? Pass this bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #6
16. I think Dennis wants single payer. But that was never on the table. Also this
IRS audit to see if your insurance purchase is large enough seems over the top against privacy, and the mandate are sure signs that something is not right for the consumer...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:54 AM
Response to Reply #16
75. You know a bill means trouble when the Yahoo headlines are screaming about the
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 02:55 AM by truedelphi
Rightness and greatness of a bill...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
50. Really? Cause I don't remember Kucinich launching a 3rd party campaign to defeat a Democrat in a
general election.

I do, however, remember Joe Lieberman doing that. And I remember the White House sending their special negotiator out on a Sunday night to order the leader of the Senate to give him anything he wanted.

We can't move fast enough to give an asshat something to screw the American people with. But we will vilify and Democrat who tries to stand up to make the bill better for people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #50
146. True, but if it's against Obama next time, and he wants to run, I'll campaign for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
daleanime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
85. Are we even talking about health care any more?
Seems to me that insurance is now the topic of discussion:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
116. So that's how you see the health care bill?
'A Centerpiece of the Democrat's policies'? And if it fails, because it is really so bad for the people, it will not be their fault? It will be Kucinich's?

If you want to defend the bill, then explain why it should pass. Don't waste time attacking people who have already made their case and very clearly explained why they cannot vote for it.

Dennis could not be more right.

I keep asking this, but never get an answer. What happened to 'Yes, We Can'? The only one saying that now is Kucinich. All I hear from Obama's side is 'No, We Can't'? Your post is a perfect example. A million excuses for why 'we can't'.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earth mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
11. They hate Dennis because he speaks the truth they refuse to see. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. They see it, they know it, they've made it happen.
They hate him for bringing it up instead of playing the game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
126. Well said, MrSlayer. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
43. +1
Thanks for putting it so well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Would that the party acted like actual Democrats as Dennis does.
Imagine a party actually working for the benefit of the People instead of weaseling around supporting the oligarchy while pretending not to. Dennis is one of the few good ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
127. Again, +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Only in the sense that John Boehner and Eric Cantor are patriots
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 09:13 PM by tritsofme
And only if killing President Obama's agenda is patriotic.

If he casts his lot with the Republicans and the insurance companies execs AGAIN, hopefully we can find a REAL Democrat to replace him in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. +1
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ardent15 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Kiling Obama's agenda is patriotic in my eyes
Because Obama's corporate giveaway agenda is not patriotic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #20
76. Totally agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
salguine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #20
94. + infinity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tallahasseedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. +1
For a very reasonable statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. You mean a real bought and paid for "real" Democrat to primary Dennis, right?
I haven't been a big fan of Dennis, but he's about the only one in Washington that has his head on straight and working for the common citizen, not corporate America first.

This bill is nothing more than a stimulus package for the insurance companies. I'll fight anything that gives them more money without real reform attached. This bill isn't it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:55 AM
Response to Reply #27
51. Yes, one of those honest to goodness Blue Dog Democrats like the one who is opposing the President's
entire agenda and bragging about it in her ads in Arkansas and...wait for it....is being endorsed by the White House. Wheeee doggies! That thar's the kinda Democrats we want!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. President Obama's agenda?
That is your measure of patriotism?

I care more about the liberal agenda, the people's agenda. And you could say the same about Obama:

If he casts his lot with the Republicans and the insurance companies execs AGAIN, hopefully we can find a REAL Democrat to replace him in the primary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. There is a reason that Republicans will unanimously oppose this legislation.
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 09:41 PM by tritsofme
Dennis sure keeps good company.

If this bill doesn't pass and the status quo is maintained, the cost will be measured in lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. Repubs obstruction is not an excuse for weak policies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:57 AM
Response to Reply #31
52. Yes, they've been clear about that. They believe if they defeat health care reform it will hurt the
Obama presidency. They don't oppose it cause it's a good bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #31
110. Yes there is. Because they are contrary to all efforts by Obama.
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 01:40 PM by YOY
You cannot say the same of Dennis. So please...spare us.

They'd be opposed to anything and everything he would do regardless of it's actual effects. It's what their tactic is. They admit it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
175. They don't oppose the legislation.
They are playing their role by pretending they do. The bill includes everything they supported. It is a larger version of Romneycare and they love it when the poor are forced to pay and get punished when they cannot afford to. As Obama and the Dems admitted, this bill has 'many of the policies Republicans support' in it.

But there is nothing, not a single thing in this bill that the people who elected this president wanted, not even the compromises proposed by several good Democrats, like Dorgan and Kucinich. All were eliminated by this WH while Republican policies were 'considered and included' as Obama admits.

They even got their anti-woman clause included. The fact that they are acting like they oppose it is just game playing as they want to win in 2010 and they will single out parts of the bill to attack. But IF they win, this bill will not be rescinded except for any part of it that gives even a tiny crumb to the people. Probably Bernie Saunders' amendment will go.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
33. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
37. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
128. Wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #128
177. Right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
15. K&R kudos to Dennis Kucinich!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kratos12 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
40. Useful idiot
Dennis, if he ends up blocking HCR will be acting as a useful idiot for the right.

The idea that killing the bill, maintaining the status quo, losing the house and or senate in the fall and probably losing the WH in 12 is somehow a good thing is the epitomy of narcissism.

Thinking that killing it will somehow result in a better deal down the road is lunacy at best, but Dennis thinks that only his ideas are good, only his ideas warrant serious consideration and if he can't have his ideas pass then bollucks to everyone else.

Dennis is essentially endorsing the status quo to the detriment of the 31 million uninsured and his party's ability to maintain control of government.

FYI to the poster who says Nader didn't give the WH to Bush, Ralph took 90K votes in Fl, Bush won by 536. Spin that anyway you please but 90K > 536 in the real world.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #40
90. Fail.
DLC's attempts to smear DK are ludicrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #40
131. It has nothing to do with narcissism.
A health care system run by the for-profit insurance industry is unsustainable anyway.

We aren't far from the tipping point where the consensus will be a single payer answer. Enacting the Democratic HCR bill might even delay the inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #40
190. Bush did not win! Gore won the popular vote and you are
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 12:31 AM by sabrina 1
accepting the inconclusive results at the point where the SC ended the counting of the votes. Had the counting continued, Gore would have won. That is why they stopped it. Several hundred thousand Democrats voted for Bush also. They did not vote for Nader. Of the 90k who voted for Nader, at least half would probably have voted for Bush, maybe more. All this has been proven anyhow, so it's a moot point. The election was stolen by the Republican Party using dirty tricks and illegal suppression of votes, and when it became apparent that even with all they did to steal it, Gore would still win, the SC stepped in and stopped the counting of the votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
18. K & R!!!!!!!!!!!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
19. Rec # 20, Just For The Record (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. Gotta love the Kooch!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. Hater/apologists swaaaaarrmmmmmm!!!!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
106. +1
and swarm they have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
35. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
36. UNREC, Kucinish refuses to outline what he does like about the bill and if it's notthing then that's
...just proof positive that he hasn't read it.

The CHC's are worth voting for themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #36
41. Please, he's outlined what he doesn't like about the bill time and time again
It's all over the internet if you care to look. He's been on TV and Radio shows talking about what he doesn't like about the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #36
132. How about a mandate with no public option.
This is exactly why the HCR bill only has a 30% approval. Add the public option and the HCR bill becomes very popular. That's what I want and that is what Dennis wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
39. kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
42. KR+34 for Dennis!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
44. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
46. IBTL
Every time there is a thread about this guy, things get ugly.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #46
53. Really? Cause there are at least 3 other active threads about him right now that aren't locked
Or was this just wishful thinking?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. I've seen it several times in the past.
Standby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #54
57. And the other posts on DK?
Perhaps you're trying to flame this to get it locked? Cause it's getting a lot of recs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
48. I agree.
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 01:49 AM by Maat
I could really use healthcare reform. We're subsisting off of my husband's small company income, and they want to raise our premiums 39%. That having been said, this bill does NOTHING. You see, mandating that they take a customer doesn't help, because they should have to take all customers AT MUCH LOWER RATES giving premium coverage. Secondly, they can still deny claims; there's nothing prohibiting them from doing that.

Third, requiring people to buy junk insurance is unconstitutional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
49. Voting to deny millions of people access to health care is patriotic.
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 01:56 AM by ProSense
More than 40,000 people die each year due to lack of coverage, but denying them access to care is patriotic.

When the bill is signed into law, Kucinich can explain why he opposed these provisions.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
557188 Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:13 AM
Response to Reply #49
59. Insurance does not equal access
How do you people not realize this yet? Do you purposely ignore everything unless it comes straight from the White House or something??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #59
61. If it's not in a White House press release, it can't be true. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #59
64. "How do you people not realize this yet? " How do you not realize
that "Insurance does not equal access" is not only lame, but inaccurate?

First, some are throwing around the claim that this is an insurance reform, not health care reform? What is that supposed to mean? The point is to reform the health care system. Switching to single payer isn't health care either. The system is not the care. Insurance pays for access to health care. Insurers have been denying access to health care and will be banned from doing so when reform is passed. Their profits will be limited and the government will have greater control over rate increases. As for health care, that is provided by doctors.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. How do we not realize this, yet? We read the bill.
And there's stuff in there not found in the WH press releases or talking points.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:31 AM
Response to Reply #67
68. I doubt it
That is, I doubt you read the bill, or even understand it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:52 AM
Response to Reply #68
73. I read every bill passed out of every committee-3 in the House, 2 in the Senate,
the final House bill, the blended bill that Reid wrote that combined the Senate HELP bill and the Senate Finance bill. Then I read the manager's amendment. And I've read the final Senate bill more than once. I've read the outline the President posted for his proposed bill. Not only that but I've worked in health care and studied health care policy for 26 years.

What would you like to know? Cause all I see from you is press releases and talking points. I've asked, in the past, for you to cite what section of the bill you find your 'facts' in and have not ever received a response to that.

But, just go on and say "I doubt it." It's about as substantive as any other argument I've seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #64
182. They will not be banned from refusing to treat the sick for five years
Why is that? There should be a law against that separate from any HCR Bill as it is a crime.

We should be happy that they are only going to allow the Healthcare Profit industry to refuse to treat sick people for four more years? What is wrong with Americans that they put up with this kind of abuse from their own government and convince themselves how lucky they are? What if that were a Republican proposal? We would be screaming about the 44,000 Americans who will die each year until then, wouldn't we? So, what makes their deaths any more acceptable if it's a Democratic Bill?

As for being 'covered' meaning access, it doesn't. The poor will 'go shopping' to this 'healthcare marketplace' with so little money they will only be able to buy the cheapest premiums, with co-pays so big, they won't go to the doctor anyhow. It is Machiavellian to force them to buy premiums they cannot use and to allow the Ins. Ind. to take that money from people who cannot afford it or to sic the IRS on them, as if they don't have enough problems to begin with.

This bill stinks. It is written by and for the Insurance Ind.

Wendall Potter, the Insurance Whistle-blower predicted this mandated insurance on the Bill Moyers Show before it became a reality. I did not believe it would as long as we had a Democratic Administration! He said the way the Ins. Corps view the uninsured was as 'a huge potential market'. And they intended to squeeze as much money out of the poor as they could. I still cannot believe that Democrats have allowed them to do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:57 AM
Response to Reply #59
77. I like that - "insurance is not access."
Says it all in just four words.

But the only words the Political Class understand is this one: MONEY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
56. And a representative of the People.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:11 AM
Response to Reply #56
58. +1000 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:22 AM
Response to Reply #56
66. How did he do in the last Presidential campaign?
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 02:23 AM by ProSense
Vote wise, what percentage of the vote did he get being "of the people"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #66
69. Oh. so anyone who doesn't win a race for the WH is not a patriot? I never knew that was the criteria
So, by that logic, Bush was a representative of the people and Kerry is not. Let's make a list of everyone who did not win a race for the White House so we know who all the lawmakers who are not representatives of the people are.

Oh...wait.. he did win his race for his Congressional seat. Could be tricky. Perhaps he represents the people who elected him in his district. I wonder...maybe he's doing what they want....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:37 AM
Response to Reply #69
71. Wait,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:53 AM
Response to Reply #71
74. The stunningly substantive responses we've all come to expect
:rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spoony Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #74
195. He doesn't do so hot
when he can't just click 'paste' does he? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:36 AM
Response to Reply #66
191. How did Gore, Kerry and Hillary do? What's your point? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:16 AM
Response to Original message
60. knr - I'm getting a bad feeling about this :( n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
62. K&R. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #62
172. Nice agility photo! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnyxCollie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #172
194. Thanks!
Dante's a good boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:17 AM
Response to Original message
63. & it was pretty lonely for him voting against Bush policies
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 02:20 AM by G_j
when so many Dems for voting for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:34 AM
Response to Reply #63
70. Yep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:59 AM
Response to Reply #63
78. That right there tells you how little the two parties are apart from one another.
Dennis is like the last remaining True Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #63
80. k&r this post.
spot on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Indi Guy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
65. K&R - Kucinich is a Pure Patriot...
...very rare breed these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:45 AM
Response to Original message
72. The Democratic leadership is too busy listening to the Insurance Lobbyists to listen to Dennis..
or the people they're supposed to be working for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:10 AM
Response to Original message
79. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kitty Herder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:11 AM
Response to Original message
81. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
82. If they had listened to DK...
... they wouldn't be about to get their collective ass waxed in the midterm and Obama might have a shot at being more than a lame duck one term failure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
83. I don't blame or hate DK. I just do not genuflect & have an orgasm at the mention of his name
as so many seem to do. I find that Dennis Kucinich has some good ideas and viewpoints, but he is like the mouse that roared: he makes a lot of noise and accomplishes little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #83
134. How fucking stupid.
A politician stands up for what we believe in so we praise him. You equate that with genuflecting and having an orgasm. elocs. I'll remember that, elocs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #134
140. Good for you, except I won't be seeing your posts anymore.
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
86. k/r for DK
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:37 AM
Response to Original message
87. DLC's failed attempts to smear him
show up in every thread about DK. They detest progressives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
88. Yes he is.
More Dennis Kucinichs and Bernie Saunders please, less Blanch Lincoln and Evan Bayhs, please.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eyerish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
89. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
91. I like DK
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 12:17 PM by fishwax
I'm not convinced that he's right here, but I won't join in the silly hating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluenorthwest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
92. Indeed he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bc3000 Donating Member (766 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
95. Kucinich 2012!!!

The only way Obama will start acting like a democrat is if we make it clear that his incumbent candidacy is not a forgone conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #95
97. His first campaign question:
This was Conyers advocating single payer in May 2008:

Equally disturbing, the Institute of Medicine reports that 20,000 Americans die each year as a direct result of having no health insurance. How can we, in the Congress, who receive fairly decent health care, tell 47 million uninsured Americans that they cannot have access to health care?

With the knowledge that 20,000 Americans die each year without health insurance, how can we, in Congress, who do have health insurance, not place universal health care as a front burner issue in this chamber?

link

Good question. Don't Americans deserve "fairly decent health care"?

Question: Why did you vote against the health care bill?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peace13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #97
123. I thought you were going to say, 'do you believe in UFOs?'
I have supported Kucinich through thick and thin and continue to contribute to his campaign even though I live outside of his district. This issue however...leaves me confused. I agree that either way his first question will be awkward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #95
99. if you think that Kucinich poses a threat to Obama being renominated
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 12:47 PM by onenote
I want some of what you are smoking.

I would never question Kucinich's patriotism and I would never support intra-party challenge to his candidacy for his seat in Congress. But he has never demonstrated the capacity to forge a broad enough coalition of support to succeed on a national level and there is no way a primary challenge by him to Obama would threaten Obama's chances of be renominated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #95
102. Kucinich running for president is as predictable as
the grunion run

Pretending Obama should fear him is precious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:41 AM
Response to Reply #102
192. I hope so, because THIS time, if he runs, I would support him.
So will many who didn't last time even though they preferred him over all the other candidates. Now we know, it's always best to vote your conscience. But Dennis will not run against a Democrat as he is far too principled to do that. So we won't get the chance again, sad to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
98. one of the few that will say it`s wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
100. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
leave iraq Donating Member (47 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
101. I am Dennis Kucinich!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Plucketeer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
103. Patriot indeed!
One of the rarest kind - the kind with priciples and the balls to stand by them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spiritual_gunfighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
104. K&R for DK!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester Messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
105. How about this:
President Obama and Dennis Kucinich disagree on the best way to accomplish the best outcome for the most people, but they are both patriots who are serving our country in the way they think best.
Neither of them is a black-garbed villain attempting the destruction of the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #105
130. Obama needs to try for some bipartisanship. he should reach out to democrats
because his governing style is republican.

that's not what I voted for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jester Messiah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:48 PM
Response to Reply #130
170. You're entitled to your opinion.
Even if it is a steaming pile of horse crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
109. K&R for Dennis!! eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
115. Indeed! (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
118. AMEN!! We need more like him instead of a bunch of corporate-owned panty-waists who
are scared to death to go against the PTB.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Goldstein1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
119. "Liberals" who support the Insurance Mandate Bill (aka "HCR")
are turning on him. He isn't my senator, but I sent him a note telling him to hang tough in his opposition. This bill, which disguises a half-assed reform effort amounting to not much more than handing millions of customers to a corrupt industry that contributes nothing health-related to health care, uses "providing insurance to the uninsured" as an argument for just getting something mislabeled as health care reform passed before the 2010 elections.

Kucinich is holding out for real reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gholtron Donating Member (54 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
121. I would agree with Dennis if we had the votes
I just don't get it. Here we are at the tip of making history on healthcare and we fight it because it does not have everything that we want. I like Dennis Kucinich. I believe that he would be a good President but on this one, I have to strongly disagree with him. Maybe he was not watching last August when two Public Option admendments failed in the Senate finance committee. Maybe he was not there when the House BARELY passed their version of HC with PO in December. Maybe he does not understand that with THIS Congress, you can not get any Single Payer Or Public Option through. But we have to crawl before we can walk and then we can run. If this fails, we are looking at 40 more years of wondering in the wilderness and being at the mercy of the insurance companies anyway. So I just don't get it. Please explain it to me somebody.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
122. What he says on the current
health care reform bill is spot on. Why should we perpetuate a for-profit system like the one we have? There is simply no justification for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
129. This is a fucked up party..
they are all over the damn place,that's why we can't get a damn thing done.

Are we suppose to get a public option now,tell me what is his stance suppose to do? Now,will the bluedogs do go along and change to a public option?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raksha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
137. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlingBlade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
138. Dennis Kucinich is a patriot K & R !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:17 PM
Response to Original message
139. he is the wind beneath my wings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #139
149. No one could have said it better!





:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #149
162. i try
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
angelicwoman Donating Member (154 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
141. great point n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
143. K&R. Excellent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
144. k&r
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
150. Fuck Dennis Kucinich. I will not see my loved ones suffer, or die, for his fucking "principles"
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
557188 Donating Member (494 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:09 PM
Response to Reply #150
160. Dennis was against the Iraq war before it was popular to be against it
I'm sure a lot of peoples "loved ones" suffered because of that colossal mistake.

Dennis is right. Simple as that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #150
183. What utter nonsense. If the Democratic Party as a whole
had his principles, no one would ever have died for lack of healthcare. This bill will allow the dying to continue because people will not be able to afford the co-pays on the premiums they will be forced to pay for. Nor can they afford the fines. That is a Republican idea adapted by Democrats, and idea that Democrats opposed until now.

Look at what is happening in Mass. with Romneycare, which is what this bill is, if you want to see what is going to happen if it passes, only on a much larger scale.

Democrats have abandoned their base, abandoned the Unions who supported them, abandoned everyone but the Insurance Industry. Kucinich is saying what OBama said before he changed his mind. And you prefer someone who flip-flops to someone stands firm on what is right. That is the problem with this country. Party politics over principles and doing what is right. This bill is the biggest flip flop ever in the history of politics in my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
152. I changed my avatar today for Dennis
after reading the 6th or 7th Message Discipline LLC thread bashing him. All of which are still open, as far as I know.

Funny how often ACTUAL Democrats are bashed on this board.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
154. I'm certainly not blaming him for anything except being a little bit dumb, and unqualified to
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 06:35 PM by Mike 03
sit on legislative Committees having anything serious to do with the economy.

Other than that, I like, respect and admire him.

I simply wish he had better staff, prepared better for hearings, and knew what he was asking and why he was asking it--and listened to the answers.

That's my only complaint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warm regards Donating Member (350 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
161. I may not always agree with him, but how can you not respect his honesty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike 03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
164. Dennis Kucinich was a phenomenon that people wanted to believe in, who never quite
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 07:16 PM by Mike 03
panned out. It wasn't even his fault. It was the fault of people who worshiped him and put all of this hope on his shoulders.

ON EDIT:

Kind of like Ross Perot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #164
186. and obama, to date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mother earth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
169. Kucinich is a hero! A lone voice for we the people. TPTB
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 07:48 PM by mother earth
are privatizing profits for the 1%, they are empowering the corporate welfare state of the nation. It's high time someone stands for what is right. I have lost all faith in this political system, it's time to take back our democracy. The moneychangers have bought & sold the country to the corporation.

Edited for K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #169
198. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
174. Eric Massa must be Zeke Mowatt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoccoR5955 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
178. Markos Moulitsas is a tool.
After he came out and said that they should wage a primary against Kucinich if he votes against the Insurance Company bailout bill.
I am so angry at him right now.
Saying that he is being like Nader. He's not, and Markos knows it. I wonder if Rahm is paying him off, to be less liberal.


As far as I am concerned we need about 100,000,000 more Kuciniches in this country, THEN, and only then, could we see REAL change in this country, and see it revert back to WE THE PEOPLE, not them, the corporations, who own it now.

KUCINICH/SANDERS 2012!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #178
184. He always was. I think it's generally known by now though.
He doesn't have much influence or respect in the blogosphere generally speaking. No one really pays attention to him except for what's left on his site. I wouldn't worry about anything he says too much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
188. K&R. I'm glad we have Dennis. //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kgnu_fan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
189. He is true American with American Ideal!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DisgustedInMN Donating Member (956 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
193. Dennis Kucinich stands for We the People...
.. Conservadems stand only for the highest bidder. One has integrity, the other doesn't.

We the People know which is which.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC