Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Somebody explain to me how Single Payer would have passed the Senate?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kratos12 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:26 PM
Original message
Somebody explain to me how Single Payer would have passed the Senate?
Or even the house for that matter.

Even before Brown, Nelson, Nelson and Landreu had to be paid off and Lieberman had to be given an assurance of no PO to secure their votes on the eventual bill.

So how could Obama have gotten Single Payer or even a robust PO through the Senate under these circumstances?

Again I say, Obama never had the votes so how the hell can we tear him down when the fault lies not with him but with the Rs and Blue dogs whose constituencies clearly opposed HCR?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. Are you spamming this board?
Here's a post of yours which is not an hour old with, essentially the same message:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7873854
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kratos12 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Maybe I'm just sick of watching Dems on this board tear down this president
over things that were out of his control.

The Republicans are united in lockstep against this bill, the only hope that Democrats have this fall is to pass this bill.

We can argue about the bill's shortcomings all the live long day, but I can assure you that if Democrats don't get behind it we will be back to whining about how mean those nasty Congressional Majority Republicans with their President Romney are.

Instead of complaining that HCR doesn't go far enough we will be complaining about Mittens cutting the upper bracket to 28% and the invasion of Iran.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. you are seriously deluded if you think passing this health insurance mandate
is going to help Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kratos12 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. You don't follow politics much do you
Failure will most assuredly doom our party, success will blunt the momentum and force the Republicans to run against HCR.

If we fail, it's most definitely over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:50 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Republicans will seize on "mandates" like stink on shit.
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 12:56 AM by WorseBeforeBetter
And you're deluding yourself if you think otherwise. Suddenly, they'll be the Great Protectors of the Middle Class, and Idiot America will fall for it.

Va. health bill could foil Obama proposal
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/03/08/va_health_bill_could_foil_obama_proposal/

"The Virginia Legislature this week is poised to become the first state to pass legislation that says citizens cannot be required to have medical insurance.

Dozens of other states are considering similar measures, possibly setting the stage for one of the greatest tests of federal power over the states since the civil rights era.

If states are allowed to opt out of the mandate, the foundation of Obama’s effort would be undermined, turning the nascent revolt here into one with national implications.

...

Versions of the bill have passed the Virginia House and Senate, with final passage considered all but certain. The Republican governor, Bob McDonnell, supports the measure."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:51 AM
Response to Reply #14
27. Why is a mandate -- with a public option -- any worse than
requiring universal taxation to pay for universal health care?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. ' tear down this president' my ass. Why didn't he prosecute torturers?
There's a conversation starter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #15
28. He's only been in office for one year, and he's got other more pressing matters.
The statute of limitations hasn't run out on that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. Wrong. He already announced it's time to "move forward" & will not prosecute
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:12 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. Okay, then here's the response I made to your other, almost identical post:
"Well, we'll never know if Obama taking a stronger stand for a more progressive bill would have moved votes in the Senate because he didn't. The facts of his deals with PhRMA, the for profit hospital lobby, and AHIP have lead me to believe he did not want a good bill. He wanted this bill and he has enlisted Senators like Nelson and Lieberman to take the fall for it.

Had he fought for a better bill and failed I would be more inclined to believe he would continue to work to improve this bill if it passes. As it is, I think he got just what he wanted and once it passes, any 'fix, will be down the same memory hole the 'fixes' we were supposed to see to NAFTA went down.

BTW, 4 out of 5 committees passed bills with a public option out of their committees. 3 in the House, 1 in the Senate. Never heard the President, one time, thank any of those committees for their work. He was too busy praising the gang of six thugs who were appointed to protect his side deals with the industry."

And before you snark at me, I follow politics a great deal and have for about 40 years now. I have also worked in health care and studied health care policy for over 2 decades. I was pushing for health care reform before most people in this country knew there was a problem.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:24 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. How are those wars going?
Commander in Chief can end them today, if he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. If I were President, I'd never stop talking about single-payer in front of the cameras
I would push it and hammer it and yell about it, TR-style, until the public was with me on the issue. That's one way to get it done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. yes
And then we might have actually ended up with a REAL compromise
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Its too late now
If Obama had wanted it he could have used his high (at the time) popularity after first taking office to go over Conress's heads and promote it directly to the people.

A full on public assault in the opening days of his administration would have put the conservadems into a corner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodoobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Super majority
just do it.


Unless of course we need a "super duper majority"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kratos12 Donating Member (221 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. There was no supermajority
The supermajority included Lieberman, Nelson, Licoln and landreu NONE of whom were on board with SP.

No matter how hard y'all wish it those mutts were squared to kill it, so in addition to wasting time and resources we would have suffered a big f-in loss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KingFlorez Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
5. It was never possible
I don't see how anyone ever thought it would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. By having Democrats win control of the Senate? Maybe that will be accomplished in 2010 .... or
2012 .... or 2020 .... or 2110.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Don't care. A public option can pass the Senate right now. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Especially if President Obama rejected his "deal" with the insurance industry and supported a P.O.
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 11:51 PM by Better Believe It
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Maybe, maybe not. What number are we up to right now, 37? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. How about if they actually listened to their constituents instead of lobbyi$t$?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
13. Faerie dust and lots of wishful thinking. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
16. Persuasion, influence, twisting arms, knocking heads, using the bully pulpit...
Chicago-style politics (that I heard so much about) -- SOMETHING.

But the Big O never wanted Single Payer, so no effort was made.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:52 PM
Response to Original message
17. All Obama had to do was go on tv and tell people to call their reps
He had that kind of political capital
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-08-10 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Really? I called Lieberman and wrote him an email. I got crap back from him.
Edited on Mon Mar-08-10 11:59 PM by Jennicut
Some of us are in denial.

Obama probably was never for it but if he was he would never convince more then 20 Senators at most. The Senate has about 2 real progressives in it. Sanders, Feingold. Now I do think he might have gotten public option. But single payer? I doubt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. "if he was he would never convince more then 20 Senators at most."
Well, we'll never know because he didn't fight for it. If he had fought for it and failed he would have some credibility now when he promises to 'fix' it after it passes. Why would I trust him to fight now? I did not think he'd fight for single payer after he remained silent while Baucus sat grinning as he had doctors and nurses arrested for showing up to advocate for single payer. But I did expect him to fight for a public option.

You think he could move 20? Good, then we should be able to get a public option under reconciliation. Oh, wait...he already said it was dead. Great strategy. Declare defeat in the 11th rounds of the heavy weight championship fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. I don't mean 'us.' The 10 brazillion people who voted for Obama
If the Reps and Senators heard from them en masse, they'd shit themselves
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
22. Senators (from both major parties) suddenly decide to do what's good for America?
And if they don't, Obama tells them so, publicly, over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
last1standing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
29. Explain to me why Single Payer advocates weren't even allowed at the table - literally.
They were thrown out of the meetings by force.

I don't think single payer would have made it through but this administration and congress is trying to keep the public ignorant of the concept. That sounds very republican to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hell Hath No Fury Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
31. Call it "Medcare for All" --
for a start. (Americans love their Medicare!) Educate the public on what it would mean to them. Ask Americans to contact their reps to support it. Send Rahmbo after any recalitrant Blue Dogs.

That is how you get "single payer".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC