Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Los Angeles considers deactivating 10 rescue ambulances during nighttime hours (to save $ of course)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:13 PM
Original message
Los Angeles considers deactivating 10 rescue ambulances during nighttime hours (to save $ of course)
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 03:13 PM by Liberal_in_LA
L.A. City Council considers shutting down ambulances
March 9, 2010 | 11:28 am

The Los Angeles City Council plans to vote Tuesday on deactivating 10 rescue ambulances around the city during nighttime hours, which is when those stations historically have the least number of calls.

By reassigning those 60 firefighters attached to the ambulances, the move could save as much as $23 million next fiscal year when the city's deficit could grow to as much as $600 million.

Fire officials have emphasized that there will still be a firetruck with life-saving equipment at each of the affected stations with firefighters capable of responding to heart attacks and other emergencies. The ambulances slated for closure handle an average of 3.5 calls daily, according to city officials.

But a number of council members are worried about slower response times and are exploring whether the department should instead reassign a number of "staff assistants" to the city's fire chiefs.

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/03/la-city-council-considers-shutting-down-ambulances.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did they consider cutting firefighter salaries? they are supposed to be very high and retirement
at age 50 with 90% of salary and health benefits seems better than in the private sector.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. probably not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC