Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Roberts: Scene at State of Union `very troubling'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:28 PM
Original message
Roberts: Scene at State of Union `very troubling'
TUSCALOOSA, Ala. (AP) -- U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts said Tuesday the scene at President Obama's State of the Union address was "very troubling" and the annual speech has "degenerated to a political pep rally."

Obama chided the court, with the justices seated before him in their black robes, for its decision on a campaign finance case.

Responding to a University of Alabama law student's question, Roberts said anyone was free to criticize the court, and some have an obligation to do so because of their positions.

"So I have no problems with that," he said. "On the other hand, there is the issue of the setting, the circumstances and the decorum.

"The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering while the court - according the requirements of protocol - has to sit there expressionless, I think is very troubling."

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_SUPREME_COURT_ROBERTS?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT


Dear Chief Justice,

Your decision in Citizens United was the equivalent to a political pep rally and the salient point is that SCOTUS is not suppose to be involved in politics, that is the job of the other branches.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Awww, is da widdle Chief Justice mad cause the President called him on the carpet?
Here, let me play you a song on the world's smallest violin: :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:52 AM
Response to Reply #1
25. he needs to pull the corn cob out of his big fat ass. When I hear
someone use 'troubling' I want to find them and hit them with a shovel. You know this man is constipated holding in all that rage, the poor little lady. WAAAA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guilded Lilly Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Chief Justice...
YOU are troubling.
Some people, including the POTUS think you really screwed up. Some people can criticize you without it being a political pep rally. And if I recall, you didn't sit there expressionless did you? You failed to live up to your own requirement of protocol. SO what have you degenerated into?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. That was his Twin Scalito
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guilded Lilly Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
16. ah, I stand corrected! Mea culpa :)
Alito, Scalia...Roberts...they all seem identical (grin) after a while!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Troubling to whom John?
It didn't bother me any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm bothered every time I think of your Lying ass
On the supreme court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. Activist Corporate Fascist Justices are very troubling.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #6
26. LOL, true enough.
Too bad the Tireless Champion of the Overprivileged Overdog will never see it that way or look down from his ivory tower long enough at those of us who do. Warren Burger, Earl Warren and William Brennan, among others, are likely spinning to beat sixty in their graves at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liquid diamond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 02:16 AM
Response to Reply #6
30. Concise and poignant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC_SKP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
7. Then he should retire, post-haste. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Go eat shit and die you Fascist scumbag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. Chief Justice...
You have sold our country to the highest bidder with that decision. Frankly, I think decorum left when the SCOTUS set Bush up on his throne. I hope and pray we can prevent the country from being any more effected by your and your kinds 'work' to undermine our democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. I'm sure it was disturbing to an activist pro-corporate judge like Roberts. //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
11. Fuck him.
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 10:01 PM by girl gone mad
Wasn't he the one mouthing dissent during Obama's address? A total breech of protocol. Now he has the nerve to complain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
12. White House Responds
“What is troubling is that this decision opened the floodgates for corporations and special interests to pour money into elections, drowning out the voices of average Americans,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said in a statement.

That’s why Obama “spoke out to condemn the decision and is working with Congress on a legislative response,” Gibbs said.

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-03-09/obama-spokesman-defends-court-criticism-after-roberts-remarks.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Thanks for posting, perfect response
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. What did you WANT to do Roberts? Jump up & flip the Congress
Edited on Tue Mar-09-10 10:02 PM by annabanana
the bird?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. I can so picture him in a white sheet instead of a black robe,
and pointy hood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
troubledamerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. + 1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. Wow, a few seconds of accountability and he protests
The USSC is NOT elected, reports to NOBODY and their decisions are FINAL.

So when they make a mistake or an intentional ruling that ultimately harms people, what recourse is there?

Seems to me that sitting stoically while someone makes a (no-consequence) criticism is eminently fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keopeli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. What if the shoe was on the other foot? Would you be so quick to judge?
What if Bush* had scolded a split court that upheld Roe v Wade or overturned the DMA while Roberts was CJ? Would he say how inappropriate the comment was? Somehow I doubt it.

I haven't heard any criticism from the four justices who voted against Citizens United. What do they have to say?

When you're a partisan judge, you tend to pick political sides, as Roberts is doing. Neutral judges (aka good judges) ignore the politics from both sides and do their job of upholding established law and precedent.

The SOTU speech has been a political tool long before Obama was a household name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hestia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Refresh my memory, but didn't Bush do exactly that, say 2003 or so? Or was his evil minion
sending out that meme on RW radio and TV? I forget the exact details...anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
20. He stands in line with the rest of the fucks that are ruining this country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ashling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. "pep rally?" Well, maybe, but
I wouldn't get all seized up about it. :shrug:


"The image of having the members of one branch of government standing up, literally surrounding the Supreme Court, cheering and hollering while the court - according the requirements of protocol - has to sit there expressionless, I think is very troubling."

Actually, Mr. Roberts, you don't HAVE to be there ... you are free to leave - Really, leave!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
23. No where near as troubling as the 'product' of this SCOTUS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-09-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. What a total ass....but asses seem to be in the majority on the SCOTUS these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
27. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
budkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
28. What's very troubling is the fact that he ever got onto the SCOTUS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
29. roberts should study some history, the hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WVRICK13 Donating Member (930 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
31. We Knew What Roberts Represented
and he was still approved. One Nation Under Total Control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
32. Herr Roberts: the state of the union is very troubling in view of a heinously felonious decision
by a particular felonious five. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoxFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
33. Forty years of right-wing blather about "activist judges"
...and not a peep.

But The Scary Black Man says something and it's a freakin' Constitutional crisis?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
34. Dear Chief Jester,
tough shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
live love laugh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. Who sat expressionless? Alito couldn't contain himself. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC