Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Revolution Will Be Televised

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:17 PM
Original message
The Revolution Will Be Televised
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 12:18 PM by FourScore
THE REVOLUTION WILL BE TELEVISED – Or at least the House-Senate conference on financial reform may be...House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-Mass.): “Republicans who moaned about President Barack Obama’s broken C-SPAN promises on health care negotiations, beware: Barney Frank plans to demand an old-school conference on financial reform. ‘Remember this, ‘Let’s do it all on C-SPAN? … Clear your calendar,’ Frank told POLITICO, adding that he has spoken to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s office and personally with Majority Leader Steny Hoyer about his intentions. … House and Senate negotiators would debate the points of disagreement between the two chambers, voting point-by-point in open session – an open session that Frank would like broadcast on C-SPAN for all the world to see. The move is a clear signal that Frank will not let Senate Republicans water-down key elements of the legislation without a public brawl. There would still be plenty of behind-the-scenes arm-twisting and deal-cutting for votes, but Frank’s plan would force Senate lawmakers to go on the record as choosing weaker proposals on the consumer protection piece and others.”

AMONG THE EXPECTED DIFFERENCES: Frank has expressed extreme displeasure with a Senate deal, developing at the committee level, to create a consumer protection division within the Federal Reserve, rather than the stand-alone Consumer Financial Protection Agency in the House-passed bill. Senate Banking Chairman Chris Dodd conceded to a scaled-back consumer body in order to win Republican votes. Frank clearly thinks the politics of the financial reform debate are on his side. "Maybe Senate Republicans want to sit there on C-SPAN in a full public conference and take that position; I don’t think so," Frank said of the consumer protection issue. "We’re going to thrash this out in conference. And I think, frankly, these issues fully debated in public may have a somewhat different outcome."

http://www.politico.com/morningmoney/0310/morningmoney100.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:25 PM
Response to Original message
1. And it's a LIE
or at the very least extremely disingenous to claim that there was no transparency with the health reform deliberations. The committee markup sessions WERE on CSPAN; I know for certain about the 2 Senate committees and Waxman's committee in the House, I assume the same is true about the other 2 House committees. The wheelings and dealings and Reid's or anybody else's office were not, it's true, but to expect that to be the case is Alice in WOnderland.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. The point is--debate on financial reform would be televised.
That's a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inuca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Absolutely
I was not criticizing anything you said. Just venting my frustration :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FourScore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh, in that case, may I join you?
I also hate the way the Republicans and media kept criticizing the democrats on HCR by saying it "was hammered out in 'back-room' deals," -- as if the republicans had no part in that deal-making. It's infuriating. Meanwhile, the liberals kept hearing about concession after concession happening to try to get the Republicans on board. So the backroom deals were in THEIR favor, not ours.

Arrrrrgh

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC