Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Harry Reid Slams Supreme Court Justices John Roberts, Anthony Kennedy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 04:17 PM
Original message
Harry Reid Slams Supreme Court Justices John Roberts, Anthony Kennedy
Harry Reid Slams Supreme Court Justices John Roberts, Anthony Kennedy For Campaign Finance Decision
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/10/harry-reid-slams-supreme_n_493532.html

The president and his aides aren't the only Democrats throwing unusually sharp and public jabs at the conservative members of the Supreme Court.

On Wednesday Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he was "so disappointed" with the Court's swing vote -- Justice Anthony M. Kennedy -- for enabling the court's rightward, corporatist tilt. As for Chief Justice John Roberts, the majority leader castigated him as being out of touch and completely detached from political reality.

"Do you think John Roberts knows or cares how people get elected?" he said, referring to the role the chief justice played in crafting the court's Citizens United decision.

(snip)
"I think we've had enough of them," he said. "I think what we need are people on that bench who have been legislators, people who are lawyers, people who are academics. You look at our Supreme Court and all these people, all they know is working with people in black robes. We have got to change that."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, gee that's nice.
Now what about the SENATE's rightward, corporatist tilt, Harry? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Credit where credit is due, please.
Taking on SCOTUS sounds pretty creditworthy to me right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Don't get me wrong, the SCOTUS sucks rancid dog balls
But if Harry called out the right wing corporatists in the "Democratic Majority" of the Senate, we would have passed a REAL health care reform bill by now, which would have ensured Democratic rule for decades regardless of how much money the corporations threw at Repukes (thanks to the Opie Roberts court)

It's the hypocrisy of calling out the court for something he should be fighting in his own workplace, and refuses to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. True. But he was up against the right wing corporatists in the Senate and the White House
I think Harry would have been better off not having the job of leader cause it forced him to work with everyone to try to get votes. He's not great but he's more liberal than most would believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. riiiiiiiiiiiight
because academics are more in touch with reality, political or otherwise?

clearly, reid hasn't learned much about academia.

judges should be in touch with common sense, case law, the constitution, and have the ability to apply the law.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Depends what you mean by academics...
Corporate think-tank intellectual mercenaries, no.

As a group, real academics at the university are far more in touch with the reality of the world they study than, as groups, the career politicians, banksters, corporate overlords, generals, billionaires, lobbyists, spook masters and over-paid pundits who run the sorry show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulsby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. i would disagree completely
as to "real academics" grasp on "political reality" (reid's words) or real world reality, so to speak.

a judge needs to apply cases to case law and the constitution

the idea that academics are the people we should be looking for to do this is imo silly

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackRiddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. I would tend to rank judges a bit higher than the other groups I mentioned.
But the Supreme Court could stand to have a poet or an artist or a great novelist, I do declare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phlem Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. Just more political theater
I think we all know both sides are really working together to distract the public. Maybe from the shadow elite, rich people who buy legislation, whomever it is or they are, that are actually running the country. Why do you think we keep heading the direction we've been on since Reagan (and maybe before) no matter which side is running the country.
They're just pawns, bought and paid for.
-p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. SCOTUS lifetime appointments creates power. Power creates corruption.
Term limits desperately need to be applied to the SCOTUS; many are out of touch and bow to the corporate vermin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebbieCDC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
8. Shoulda thought of that BEFORE he was confirmed Harry
you asshole
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. yawn
:boring:

Wake me up when Harry actually does something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phlem Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. When he's not up for re-election
and doing shitty in his state.

-p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC