Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Full text of Grayson's Medicare You Can Buy Into Act

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:21 PM
Original message
Full text of Grayson's Medicare You Can Buy Into Act
Edited on Wed Mar-10-10 09:22 PM by Spheric
For anyone who wants to read it, Grayson's public option bill (H.R. 4789) is really short:

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for an option for any citizen
or permanent resident of the United States to buy into Medicare. Be it enacted by
the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in
Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the "Public Option Act" or the "Medicare You Can Buy Into Act".

SECTION 2. UNIVERSAL MEDICARE BUY-IN OPTION.

(a) IN GENERAL.—Part A of title XVIII of the Social Security Act is amended—

(1) in section 1818(a), by striking "or 1818A" and inserting ", 1818A, or 1818B"; and

(2) by inserting after section 1818A the following new section:

UNIVERSAL BUY-IN
SECTION 1818B.

(a) IN GENERAL.— Every individual who—

(1) is a resident of the United States;

(2) is either
(A) a citizen or national of the United States, or
(B) an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence; and

(3) is not otherwise entitled to benefits under this part or eligible to enroll under
this part; shall be eligible to enroll in the insurance program established by this part.
An individual may enroll under this section only in such manner and form as may be
prescribed in regulations, and only during an enrollment period prescribed in or
under this section.

(b) ENROLLMENT; COVERAGE.— The Secretary shall establish enrollment periods and
coverage under this section consistent with the principles for establishment of
enrollment periods and coverage for individuals under section 1818, except that no
entitlement to benefits under this part shall be effective before the first day of the
first calendar year beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.

(c) PREMIUMS.—

(1) IN GENERAL.— The provisions of subsections (d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3) of section
1818 insofar as they apply to premiums (including collection of premiums) shall apply
to premiums and collection of premiums under this section, except that—
(A) paragraphs (4) and (5) of section 1818 shall not be applicable; and
(B) the estimate of the monthly actuarial rate under section 1818(d) shall be
computed and applied under this paragraph based upon costs incurred for individuals
within each age cohort specified in paragraph (2) rather than for all individuals age
65 and older.

(2) AGE COHORTS.— The age cohorts specified in this paragraph are as follows:
(A) Individuals under 19 years of age.
(B) Individuals at least 19 years of age but not more than 25 years of age.
(C) Individuals at least 26 years of age and not more than 35 years of age.
(D) Individuals at least 36 years of age and not more than 45 years of age.
(E) Individuals at least 46 years of age and not more than 55 years of age.
(F) Individuals at least 56 years of age and not more than 64 years of age.

(d) TREATMENT.— An individual enrolled under this part pursuant to this section shall
not be treated as enrolled under this part (or any other part of this title) for purposes
of obtaining medical assistance for medicare cost-sharing or otherwise under title XIX.



I would be willing to support the Senate HCR bill with Obama's modifications (Stupak be damned) as long as Grayson's bill also passes.

Making the insurance companies play a little fairer by outlawing pre-existing conditions, etc. while also making them compete with "Medicare at cost" seems like the way to go to me.

As they know, that is a slippery slope to full public supported healthcare, so they will fight it tooth and nail. And for our own protection and the future for our children, so must we. There is absolutely no reason for us to continue to support a system that allows insurance company executives to buy their second yacht off of our misfortune by denying us coverage while adding absolutely nothing of value to our health care needs.

This bill is so simple, there is no way they can find "death panels," etc. in it to scare the ill-informed. The whole damn bill could be posted on a flyer. You could read it on a TV screen.

Honestly, Grayson has really simplified this whole thing. It's almost like he's trying to single-handedly save the Democratic party from disaster in November. I would really like to see a huge wave of support behind this. It has the potential to be overwhelming.

I understand that as of today, we now have 41 senators signed onto voting for a public option. This particular public option will be difficult for anyone to walk away from, and I believe it might even gain a Republican vote or two if they wish to keep their seats.

I am hoping we will fight for this with everything we have. Tooth and nail will prevail.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Usrename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tooth and nail!
Put me on that slippery slope to full public supported healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks for the support.
We will need a lot more to make this work. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TCJ70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is where it should have started...
...oh well. It's a good idea and would save medicare for the future...but what politician wants to do that right? /sarcasm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Yes, it should have.
But, since it didn't, hopefully it will be where it ends.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Edweird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. If they want the senate bill to get ANY support, they need to pass this FIRST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #4
13. It would be nice if they could - or would, actually.
I think the "pass the Senate bill and fix it with reconciliation" train has already left the station, though.

It would be nice to see Grayson's bill move forward on its own as a stand alone with nothing else tied to it. It would make it very difficult to oppose, even for Republicans. It is as American as apple pie. No socialism here, you have to buy into it - you know, pay your own way. And most people already love Medicare. That makes it even more difficult to attack.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. That's what the House should do. Tell the Senate to pass this and we agree to
pass the Senate bill as-is after.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. K & R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. So if this fails, will the Kucinich hit mob lust for the ineffectual blood of Grayson too?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. We can't let it fail...
We have been thrown a lifeline and we need to grab it and move forward with all the power we can muster.

We have to force the MSM to pay attention to this. The whole bill would fit in a letter to the editor.

I guarantee if this bill were out in front of the American people, it would get vast support.

It sells itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tashca Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R.........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 11:01 PM
Response to Original message
10. kr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
waiting for hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-10-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R - for content.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 04:03 AM
Response to Original message
12. k & r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC