Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If interested, here is the roll call on the Kucinich Resolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 11:23 AM
Original message
If interested, here is the roll call on the Kucinich Resolution
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=h2010-98

One surprise: Bart Stupak was a YES vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, my congressman, Tierney, voted yay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Look at all those Ds voting for war. Abso-fucking-lutely SHAMEFUL!
Edited on Thu Mar-11-10 11:33 AM by Subdivisions
This is no longer chimp's War on Terror. This is OUR war. Democrats' war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. thanks to Kucinich we know who the whores are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 11:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. All the blue-dogs from Arkansas voted Nay, but say HCR is a no-no because of cost.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. As I said in another thread, it's now a matter of record
History will note who stood for peace and who lusted for war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
6. Our up and coming Rep. Artur Davis, chickened out
by not voting.
Our other Dem, Parker, is really a Republican.

Be sure to click on the Rep's name, which leads to a page pointing out all sorts of good information about that person.
Cool site...highly recommend.

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good my Representative voted against this foolish resolution
Edited on Thu Mar-11-10 12:27 PM by NJmaverick
Yet another example of time wasting proposals that produce nothing, something Dennis is famous for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. He forced a vote on the record.
That was useful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. We have different ideas of what is useful
To me useful helps lower insurance costs or gets the uninsured some insurance. Useful is reducing green house gases and our dependence on important oil. Useful is reducing the budget deficit or helping get Americans back to work. Pretty sure there isn't a single person that can use your precious record to put food on the table or as payment for needed medical services.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I think it would be useful to end the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. Sestak is a nay
Not really seeing much that progressive from him. The only thing that might make me for for him in the PA primary is the fact Specter could switch again easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msedano Donating Member (682 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you. I knew my pig wanted more dead troops...Adam Schiff.
Edited on Thu Mar-11-10 12:12 PM by msedano
Thank you for making this available. I held hope my local pig, Adam Schiff, who was Bush's staunchest supporter and a genuine glorifier of war, might have come to moral purpose. Odd, but his biography fails to mention if he put in time in uniform.

But for others in the California delegation, a handful of genuine patriots:

Yea CA-6 Woolsey, Lynn
Yea CA-7 Miller, George
Yea CA-9 Lee, Barbara
Yea CA-12 Speier, Jackie
Yea CA-13 Stark, Fortney
Yea CA-17 Farr, Sam
Yea CA-32 Chu, Judy
Yea CA-33 Watson, Diane
Yea CA-35 Waters, Maxine
Yea CA-37 Richardson, Laura
Yea CA-38 Napolitano, Grace
Yea CA-39 Sanchez, Linda
Yea CA-47 Sanchez, Loretta
Yea CA-48 Campbell, John
Yea CA-51 Filner, Bob

recommended and passed along to others.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sestak of PA voted nay.
No surprise there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-11-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yikes! they only yes in my state came from an R..
NC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC