Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stock Futures Surge on Retail Sales

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Elmore Furth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 09:58 AM
Original message
Stock Futures Surge on Retail Sales
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:00 AM by Elmore Furth
Source: Wall Street Journal

US stock futures surged after US retail sales posted a surprising gain in February, despite fierce snowstorms and troubles at automaker Toyota Motor.

U.S. stocks opened higher, as investors were cheered by an unexpected jump in U.S. retail sales last month and a crowd-pleasing nomination for the Federal Reserve's vice chairman spot.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 18 points, or 0.2%, at 10631. Materials and industrials components jumped on the positive economic data. Alcoa rose 1.3%, while Caterpillar gained 1.2%. Retailers also climbed, including Procter & Gamble, up 0.2% and Home Depot, up 0.6%.

The Nasdaq Composite edged up one point, while the Standard & Poor's 500-share index rose 0.1%. Its materials and financial sectors led the climb, while health care and utilities lagged.



Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704131404575117280091499778.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. LOL
A sucker born every minute. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. I can't wait to see the sure to follow "ignore the good news, it's really bad" spin
With more and more good news, the spin has gotten more outrageous and amusing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. The first post didn't even bother with spin
Sometimes, the DU Doomsters think it's sufficient to post LOL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Why is the report good news?
Tell me why this is good news. Articulate it without using the words in the WSJ article.

Tell me which part of the report you like, dislike, and are unsure about. Or does the WSJ do your thinking for you.

It is only about 3 pages, if you want to bash people, please do it intelligently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. I look around me and I see a World of Hurt
This is why I laugh, to keep from crying.

However, to articulate the motivation for the response: A (previously) 70% consumer-driven economy is not going to see a rise in retail sales when the consumer is unable to consume.

Better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Yeah that one was just phoned in
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Why is the report good news NJ Maverick?
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:16 AM by AllentownJake
Enlighten me.

I want you to tell me which part of the report you like...final number is not an answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Now that's a novel approach
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:39 AM by NJmaverick
don't spin it, rather question why rising sales and stocks are good news. Points for originality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Can't answer the question can you?
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:40 AM by AllentownJake
Stocks rise on lay off news sometimes. That is bad news for some people.

Good is a matter of your perspective as is bad.

Now, I'll go back, please tell me what you saw in the report that gives you hope for the future in your mind, the stock market and rising sales overall is not the answer. It is in there, but let's play a critical thinking skills game.

Do you have the ability sir?

You obviously have some time right now, you are fucking around on here.

There is stuff in there you can extrapolate and say good news about, as there is stuff I can point to, to be contrary. However you always talk about raising the level of discussion...want to raise it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Let me see then if I can teach you why increased sales is good news
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:52 AM by NJmaverick
See if retail sales increase, then retailers increase their orders and hire more staff. Increase orders mean that manufacturers increase their staffs as well as their orders to other companies (for parts, sub-components and raw material) The increase in sales also increases the tax revenue at the state and in some cases the municipal level.
So the reason stocks rise on news like this, is that it is an indicator that economy and jobs are bouncing back. Some experts are predicting that 300,000 jobs will be created in the private sector in the month of March. With news like this, it would appear those predictions have an excellent chance of being correct.

Any questions?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. NJ Maverick
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:53 AM by AllentownJake
Did you read the report?

Seriously for someone who is so "intelligent" I find it really amusing you can't give me an explanation of which sectors saw an increase in sales.

I can make a dozen assertions on showing how increased sales is not a good thing. One would be if the CPI for a sector increases above the increase in sales, which means people paid more for less.

;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Yes I read the report on Bloomberg, but I find it sad
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:54 AM by NJmaverick
that you are so blinded by agenda that you are incapable of recognizing good news (this despite claims of a background in the financial sector).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. I didn't see anything in there to jump up and down about
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 11:25 AM by AllentownJake
Auto sales saw a decline as well as other large capital assets.

Slight increase in electronics and furniture but year over year you have a decline.

Biggest increase was in grocery stores, which judging by the behavior I saw before both snow storms, makes the most sense. If the CPI numbers weren't calculated and adjusted right, people bought the same amount of stuff and got less.

Bars are doing good, which is normally typical of a recession/depression period.

Anything else oh wise NJ Maverick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. Oh and the biggest thing in there
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 11:35 AM by AllentownJake
Kind of Business 2010 % change from 2009

Gasoline stations................................ 61,289 26.4%


;-)

What does that mean oracle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
33. There is no 'news' in that statement, only conjecture
That is: These jobs and sales and taxes of which you speak are purely speculative. That is, they haven't materialized yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. He didn't even bother to read the frakking report
Lazy if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think that this has more to do with options expiration than actual...
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:03 AM by rfranklin
belief that a 0.3% increase in retail sales (which will be revised next month) is a sign of "recovery."

Meanwhile, on the front page of MSNBC directly below this story is

New wave of foreclosures threatens market
Up to 7 million homes are potentially eligible but haven’t been repossessed
By Renae Merle
The Washington Post
updated 5:52 a.m. ET, Fri., March. 12, 2010
WASHINGTON - The housing market is facing swelling ranks of homeowners who are seriously delinquent but have yet to lose their homes, and this is threatening a new wave of foreclosures that could hit just as the real estate market has begun to stabilize.

About 5 million to 7 million properties are potentially eligible for foreclosure but have not yet been repossessed and put up for sale. Some economists project it could take nearly three years before all these homes have been put on the market and purchased by new owners.

And the number of pending foreclosures could grow much bigger over the coming year as more distressed borrowers become delinquent and then, if they can't obtain mortgage relief, wade through the foreclosure process, which often takes more than a year to complete.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/35832152/ns/business-washington_post/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "Shadow Inventory"
In California, these "pending" foreclosures far outnumber
actual homes in foreclosure or for sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. It really isn't that much of a surge
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 10:20 AM by AllentownJake
18 points in after-hour trading? .2% is a surge in the stock market, it is generally normal days movement.

The entire article is propaganda with a few facts thrown in.

Come on, it is a Newscorp rag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
6. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. Indeed. So again I say:
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. Here's the BBC story (on retail sales not stocks): US retail sales rise boosts recovery hopes
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/8564711.stm

US retail sales showed a surprise rise in February as consumers braved extreme bad weather to get to the shops. The US Commerce Department said retail sales rose 0.3% last month, whereas forecasts had predicted a fall of 0.2%. Parts of America were hit by major snow storms in February, sparking concerns that consumers would remain at home.

The overall gain in sales was held back by a 2% fall in car sales, reflecting in part the recall problems at Toyota. Excluding cars, sales rose 0.8%, far better than the 0.1% rise outside of autos that economists had forecast.

Camilla Sutton, a senior strategist at Scotia Capital, said the sales figures were a further hint "that the US recovery is intact and ongoing". "There's been a lot of worry about how the economy will transition from government spending to consumer spending and we're starting to see some evidence of that," she said.

US consumer spending has been slow as because high unemployment has squeezed household income, leading to worries that the economy's recovery from the worst downturn in seven decades could falter. Higher consumer spending is vital for US recovery because it accounts for about 70% of economic activity.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. What sectors saw an improvement
Why are you reading the BBC, WSJ, or any other news outlets reporting on the report. It isn't that long and it is right there for you to read. It isn't that difficult to understand.

Listen, if you read the report, and can tell me why you think it is good news, I have no problem with that. Articulate and defend your position. Why are you taking someone else's word on it when it right there on the website, not that long, and not that hard to read.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Physician heal thyself. Articulate and defend your position.
In the story is the following quote: Excluding the car sector, all other retail sales rose 0.8%, more than the 0.1% forecasted increase. The retail jump was boosted by soaring electronic store sales, despite blizzards that crippled the East Coast and a 2% dive in U.S. car and parts sales in February." To answer your "what sectors saw improvement" question, electronic store sales is the only sector mentioned at the link in the OP.

If you have read the report itself, kudos to you. If you would rather not share your observations and opinion, I have no problem with that. I do not, however, feel guilt about posting links to other media and their analysis of the story. If you don't agree with them, I have no problem with that either.

Mathematically if cars and car parts sales fell 2%, but overall retail sales rose 0.8%, then there must have been many sectors that rose. "f you read the report, and can tell me why you think it is (bad) news, I have no problem with that." You seem to leave the impression that the rise in retail sales is not good news ("what sectors saw improvement"), but do not site anything from the report to back up your contention. Articulate and defend your position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #21
30. Educate yourself and get back to me
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 11:45 AM by AllentownJake
http://www.census.gov/retail/marts/www/marts_current.html

People buying more groceries and the year over year numbers are scary. A glitch in the CPI calculation the grocery increase is simply inflation. That combined with the year over year gasoline station. 26.4% more purchases of Gas. Year over year, that is your biggest increase. Gas was 1.91 on average this month in 2009. Do some extrapolation. I paid 2.72 this morning.

Now you see why I think the report is funny :rofl:



NEXT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
22. Pretty funny, the WSJ report has changed ...
... the DOW is down and the Wall Street Journal is now downplaying the retail sales number.

Consumer sentiment is down, inventories are stagnant, retail sales up a meager .3 percent.

Not really any "good news" here ... the economy is mired in unemployment and debt, that's all there is to it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. So you think it's bad news because a FAUX news publication has
put a negative spin on the news???:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #24
25. They put a great spin on it this morning
Can't have it both ways

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Unlike you I don't put any stock in what the FAUX news owned WSJ says
then again I am trying to get to the facts and the truth, so I have no use for meaningless propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. I called the WSJ article bullshit first and told people to read the report
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 11:38 AM by AllentownJake
:rofl:

What the hell are you talking about.

There is a time stamp on my post, and your hip hip hooray post.

Give you a hint. Mine laughing about the WSJ and all business reporting beats yours.

I went to the report first and made my assumptions.

Now go along and tell me how smart you are some more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. Bottom line is increased sales (especially in light of anticipated declines due to the weather
in the NE) is very good news, economically speaking. It's beyond absurd that there are people trying desperately to convince people that signs of an improving economy are bad.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. I've explained to you multiple times how that assumption is not necessarily true
Edited on Fri Mar-12-10 12:03 PM by AllentownJake
You have an inability to comprehend that.

There is nothing in that report to say the sky is falling other than the gasoline year over year numbers, and there is nothing to say blue skies either.

If they did the CPI calculation wrong which is highly probable, that % disappears and can go negative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #24
28. It's bad news because ...
... there is precious little to indicate that the 'Great Recession' is anywhere near ending for working or un-working Americans.

It's not a matter of spin or which 'news' portal reports a statistic here or there, it's a matter of a real 20 percent unemployment/underemployment rate, foreclosures still rising, college tuitions still going up, health insurance premiums going up, incomes falling or flat, etc.

When unemployment/underemployment declines a percentage point in a month or so and we see that it is because manufacturers are hiring and not Wal-Mart, that will be good news.

See the difference?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truthisfreedom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
34. While in other news, neither WSJ nor faux newz are hiring.
And are expected to be laying off more financial reporters soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwixVoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
35. Since when is DOW up 18 a fu**ing "surge"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. When the dow is at 100 points
Other than that, it is a normal day at the office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
38. I'm very excited about this.
I've worried that with the bad winter weather so pervasive, we'd have a bad February.

We have to put more people back to work, and this bit of good news comes at an important time on the verge of springtime, when businesses are deciding whether to add personnel or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Re-read the report
That combined with this which was done by guys smarter than me.


http://www.zerohedge.com/article/debunking-myth-us-retail-sales-improvement
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-12-10 08:00 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. but it surged! the WSJ said so! Oh you mean they left some important
stuff out of that report? I'm shocked! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC