Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What Do You think About "The Coffee Party"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 09:39 AM
Original message
What Do You think About "The Coffee Party"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalLoner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. I "joined" it on Facebook but now am worried I might have
made a mistake. I don't know. I hope I didn't make a mistake. I meant for it to be a gesture to say I am sick of the teabaggers and want our nation to be less dysfunctional.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. see my post below, looks okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southernyankeebelle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
12. I unjoined. I read here on DU I think that this organization is really a
tea party lite and really are made up of republicans. I dunno if it is true. So I decided to leave and I will support the democrat party. No matter what it is still better then what the other side has to offer, even though at times I agree with some of their anger at wall street and the banks. But that is it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
18. No it's not made up of GOP or started by them
It was started by an OFA staffer. That's hardly Republican and not grassroots either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yeah because the OFA staffers I met during the campaign sucked (sarcasm off)
Young people actually being paid to work over 40 hour weeks staffing and coordinating campaign apparatus is not how McCain was defeated in your world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Huh? When did I say that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. democrat party?
It's Democratic Party. As a 'democrat' you should know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
29. Or the Republicans planted that story?
It's the "DemocratIC" party, btw.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #29
39. ...aided by their DLC pals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #12
36. I know you meant no disrespect but a heads up, here: 'democrat party'
is generally consindered a RW slur they use to avoid calling us the Democratic party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
48. and all the advice given on DU is 100% correct?
okay.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiller4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #12
73. Not true in my area where most of the coffee group are also
members of the local Young Dems. Others are attending their first political events. The latter included quite a few Native American Youth and the local gathering was promoted by posters all over Puyallup Tribal Health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. this much I do know (the founders)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 09:44 AM
Response to Original message
4. Not much...
the term "Tea Party" has (however tenuously) a link to history that will resonate with the public. The term "Coffee Party" is simply a reaction to the success of the "Tea Party". If you want a group that will agitate for a progressive agenda, more power to you (I don't believe either group will have much political clout), but come up with an original and relevant name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #4
15. I disagree, Tea Party is actually a stupid name
Any name that is supposed to have a certain political meaning, I believe would be a mistake. Like dumbass PUMA

Plus I am a huge coffee fiend (everyday) and since I love my caffeine I say my caffeine is stronger than yours, you weak Tea Bags!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #4
37. How About The "Beer Party"........nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
55. What about "American Spirit Party"?
The American Dream has become a nightmare. The only thing that can fix it is a healthy dose of good old fashioned "American Spirit," for the establishment of a Social-Democratic Republic that promotes:

• Repeal of corporate personhood
• 100% Federally Funded Campaigns
• Universal Health Care
• Universal Education and High Speed Information Access
• Environmentally sound economics and politics
• True separation of church and state, with religious tolerance for the religiously tolerant
• Green Energy policies
• Peace through Responsible Diplomacy
• Security through Responsible Strength
• Restructuring of the US Credit Score Policy
• True Human Equal Protection under the law

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #55
66. How about the "Liberal Party" or "Progressive Party"?!!!
naw - that would be too simple...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. Not So Simple As You Might Think
Both your choices have history. The "Liberal Party" was created as a knee jerk, Anti-Communist alternative to FDR's Democratic Party, still operates in New York, and once backed Rudy Giuliani for Governor and John Anderson for President. Too republican for my tastes.

The "Progressive Party" has another name you may know better - the "Bull Moose Party" used by Teddy Roosevelt. This party has a platform I actually appreciate on many levels (though some seem antiquated now) :

• women's suffrage
• recall of judicial decisions
• easier amendment of the U.S. Constitution
• social welfare legislation for women and children
• workers' compensation, limited injunctions in strikes
• farm relief, revision of banking to assure an elastic currency
• required health insurance in industry
• new inheritance taxes and income taxes
• improvement of inland waterways
• and limitation of naval armaments

A mostly decent platform, though I wonder how women would respond to a paternalistic reform of social welfare in their favor, poor things. I'm also none too convinced that easing the process on Constitutional reform would be wise. What do you think?

So creating a new party out of these historic choices, both of which are heavily influenced by Republicans, is not what I think of when I think of "too simple".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #66
69. Let's set aside a name for now
by talking about an appropriate name, you agreed to the need.

Let's concentrate on an acceptable platform. How does this sound for a start:

• Repeal of corporate person hood
• 100% Federally Funded Campaigns
• Universal Health Care
• Universal Education and High Speed Information Access
• Complete autonomy over personal medical decisions (including decisions regarding birth, preventative treatment, and death)
• Complete Secularization of Marriage
• Environmentally sound economics and politics
• True separation of church and state, with religious tolerance for the religiously tolerant
• Green Energy policies
• Peace through Responsible Diplomacy
• Security through Responsible Strength
• Restructuring of the US Credit Score Policy
• True Human Equal Protection under the law
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. There concept of getting people together to discuss issues that effect society
Is noble, and furthers both communication and ideas of involvement. They also believe, from the interview that I saw, that rational reasonable debate and conversation can further a society, a basic belief in the ability for people to be able to self govern and solve problems.

From the limited comments made about the organization, I like what I have heard, instead of promoting hype they are promoting issue related thought on topics. Education and sharing of ideas, is also a belief that people are mostly good and just getting them involved can make a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. The main issue is that government is not the enemy
"We recognize that the federal government is not the enemy of the people, but the expression of our collective will."

That is the antithesis of the paranoid style of the Tea Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RandomThoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #11
17. I agree with that, government is suppose to be the advocate of the people.
If there are problems, it is not the government, but the sources that pull them away from advocating for society.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bjorn Against Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
38. That is actually one of the issues I have with the Coffee Party...
The fact is that the government often does put corporate interests ahead of the people they are supposed to represent, and it is difficult to argue that the federal government has ever truly represented the collective will of the people. Being able to choose between two different politicians every four years hardly represents citizen control of government.

I think that as citizens we have to recognize when government is doing good as well as when it is working against our interests, and when it is working against our interests we need to stand up to it.

The problem with the Tea Party is not that they are angry with government, the problem is that they are angry at government for the wrong reasons.

I think progressives need to do a better job of making it clear that we do not support government intrusion in people's lives, that is why we oppose the efforts on the neo-cons and their allies to expand American empire and it is also why we stood up to the Bush Administration when they were shredding the Constitution. We can support the government when it provides health care, but we can not support it when it sends our brothers and sisters off to die for oil.

If progressives want to be effective we can not buy into the right-wing's false talking points about who we are, we are not for "big government" we are for creating a government that works for the people rather than for the corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftstreet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #38
54. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
58. By government is not the enemy, represents the opposite vie of the Tea Party, that Gov't is
incapable of doing anything for the betterment of society, and seeking to roll back the New Deal, which has always been a goal of the right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
6. I don't care for this "Coffee Party"concept, as it elevates (or actually, lowers) us to


their level. It smells a bit too much like a tit-for-tat (pardon the term here, folks, but what the heck, let the comments begin!)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think it serves our best interest to create a second rate copy of a second rate concept
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 09:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I seriously doubt that the rational high information voters flocking to the Cofffee Partty would
ever present themselves as absolute buffoons behaving badly at Town Halls & carrying illiterate racist signs

I think the contrast will be helpful
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Then come up with an original branding concept that is worthy of the message
Don't hang on the back of the buffoons branding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. whatever
Edited on Sat Mar-13-10 10:15 AM by roseBudd
Hang out on DU all day complaining

I admire the founder Annabelle. This idea of hers is consuming all of her time.

She worked hard like a lot of us on the Obama campaign.

Most of those volunteers aren't doing anything, and the healthcare reform was stymied by the Town Hall bullying tactics and the death panel lies.

I have been fighting the smears everyday since July 2008. I spend countless hours refuting the liars on the right. If I had 50 more people helping me in my media market that would be huge.

you in?

It's a swing state & our freshman D rep is endangered

By the Tea Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:47 AM
Response to Reply #16
40. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #16
50. Thank you
for inadvertently proving my point. The moment you used the phrase "Whatever" you conceded the argument you ran out of the intellectual steam to refute my statement. One word "Whatever" sends as powerful message just like any kind of branding should do.

The one lesson Progressives have failed to learn, in the past 30 years, that Conservatives are absolutely genius at, is their ability brand their ideas like No Child Left Behind that leaves plenty of children behind or a concept like Fair Tax which has nothing to do with being fair. They get it, feed people compelling bite size bits of information in bumper sticker sized doses and fuck the details, because after all they know perception is today's reality.

If you had 50 people like yourself you wouldn't get any further than you are right now, you're a Progressive Sisyphus, you said it yourself, you spend countless hours refuting liars, how's that working for you?. You don't need 50 people you need one professional person with the talent to create a message that resonates to a majority and that's why the Coffee Party is doomed before it begins, you need to be ahead of the curve and branding yourself with a cheap imitation of your opponent automatically puts you behind.

Am I in, no way, I'll save my effort for someone more public relations savvy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #50
78. I thought you were just an ass to me
but you're not. You're an equal opportunity asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
72. Liberal Party and Progressive party are taken
but by talking about an appropriate name, we have agreed to the need.

Let's concentrate on an acceptable platform. How does this sound for a start:

• Repeal of corporate person hood
• 100% Federally Funded Campaigns
• Universal Health Care
• Universal Education and High Speed Information Access
• Complete autonomy over personal medical decisions (including decisions regarding birth, preventative treatment, and death)
• Complete Secularization of Marriage
• Environmentally sound economics and politics
• True separation of church and state, with religious tolerance for the religiously tolerant
• Green Energy policies
• Peace through Responsible Diplomacy
• Security through Responsible Strength
• Restructuring of the US Credit Score Policy
• True Human Equal Protection under the law

I am promoting the "American Spirit Party" with this as a platform. The name isn't taken, it has a good emotional connection, and it takes "Party Spirit" or partisanship, and flips it on it head.

Had enough of blind partisanship? Had enough of parties that can't - or won't - get anything done? Drop your Party Spirit, join the American Spirit Party. A party by the people, of the people, and for the people. We don't need a revolution - we ALREADY have a form of Government where the source of power originates from the people. WE are the government! Why overthrow OURSELVES?

The problem is that we've lost the American Spirit - the will to govern ourselves, the need to live free, the desire to participate in the great experiment called America. We've abdicated our power, turning it over to Corporate interests and Partisan Politics. Without the power that comes from the People, America will not survive.

Regarding partisan politics, our first president, George Washington, wrote: "It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another."

It isn't time for a revolution. It's time for an infusion of American Spirit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #72
76. It had such good emotional connection
That's why a cigarette company branded it.

https://www.nascigs.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #76
77. Yes, thats true. Despite your fucking snark, you are correct.
So what else do you want to snark about? Anything of value this time?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevenmarc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #77
79. Actually
That was a valuable piece of information despite your fragile ego.

If you had presented that name in a branding meeting you would have been told the same thing and hopefully you would have had a Plan B. You really can't base the name of a Progressive Political movement on a cigarette well unless you were counting on the potential media attention from the expected tobacco company lawsuit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #79
82. It's not based on a cigarette any more than "Fair and Balanced" is a trade mark of Fox News
If you hear the words "American Spirit" and the first thing that really comes to your mind is tobacco - you're not just fucking with me - then have a great day.

But, FYI - the actual name of the cig is "Natural American Spirit" and if you're truly concerned, you might be pleased to hear that "American Spirit" is also the name of a federal credit union (which has not been sued by a tobacco company), a cruise ship (which has not been sued by a tobacco company), a Mannheim Steamroller album (they have not been sued by a tobacco company), a charitable foundation (which has not been sued by a tobacco company), and most importantly, a medallion bestowed by a corporation known as the Citizens Committee for the Army, Navy and Air Force, Inc, and awarded to members of the Armed Services for "the display of outstanding qualities of leadership best expressing the American spirit—honor, initiative, loyalty, and high example to comrades in arms."

The last I heard, the Citizens Committee for the Army, Navy and Air Force, Inc has not been sued by any tobacco company. If you have evidence to suggest otherwise, then I'd be happy to review it. I'm always open to new facts. but don't come at me with what would happen in a marketing meeting, because I really don't care. this isn't a branding meeting. This is a free for all political forum. Your rules mean nothing :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
8. I am attending one today to recruit writers for my MSM writing team...
We use a newspapers comments and recommend features to fight smears and ridicule the opposition.

I have been doing it since July 2008, and my county voted 2 Democrats (POTUS & house) in what was a reliably blue county in the swing state of

OHIO!!!!

And as you know McCain could not win without Ohio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabbycat31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
10. going to one today
we'll see what happens there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's OFA, Ding
Not exactly grassroots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
35. I didn't know that..
So it's not exactly nonpartisan? I want nothing to do with OFA DNC DLC, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #35
43. The woman who started it is a film maker who made videos for OFA
There was a big deal on FB about her and who she was. Then I saw her on CNN and did some Googling.

I also am troubled that this coffee party sprung up right after Plouffe returned to the WH to help on Obama's 2012 election.

For me it's not so much that it's OFA, but that it is being promoted as grassroots. We were all over the teabaggers for claiming they were grassroots. Why support this group who is also obviously not grassroots?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. OFA has been an absolute failure
This is them trying to reboot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
57. Working for OFA is in no way equivalent to Dick Armey & Freedom Works
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #57
61. And no one in the WH is capable of setting up such an organization
and pretending it's grassroots.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
20. I'm going to a local meetup today
Trying not to let myself hope that this will be the beginning of momentous change. At my age, I should know better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Emit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #20
34. After you rmeeting, let us know how it went
I'd be curious to know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #34
56. I left before it was over
Too weak, too diluted, too much emphasis on holding hands and playing nice and working together. It's not left or right, Republican or Democratic, not an answer to the Tea Party. It's just lots of good intentions and optimism.

Also, despite the lip service to the organization being grass roots and bottom up, the whole event was predetermined and dominated by the moderator and his script, which parroted what's on the Coffee Party Web site.

I want an organization that will tap into and represent the anger of the left. I don't know if such an organization would have a political impact, but I don't think the Coffee Party will, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:18 AM
Response to Original message
21. They don't seem too serious.
but I'm okay with that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. Like anything on Facebook, the serious members will be the ones who are actually activists
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. If the meetups actually happen face-to-face, this could go somewhere.
Did you go to one this morning? How was the turnout?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud Liberal Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
24. Seems o.k. to me
Edited on Sat Mar-13-10 11:05 AM by Proud Liberal Dem
I don't see anything objectionable about it offhand. They certainly makes the "teabaggers" look like a bunch of whack-a-loons by comparison and I appreciate that they don't seem to have the hysterical and paranoid reaction to governmental intervention that makes worry so much about the "teabaggers" (and Republicans). I also appreciate that they're sick and tired of the obstructionism in Congress and want to get things done. Maybe they will help re-invigorate the moderates on the right end of the spectrum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
25. It doesn't seem objectionable.
But that very may contain the architecture for critique.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gulliver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
26. I think it is excellent.
Hopefully it stays enlightened. I'll be watching for demonstrations to start to see if it gets overrun by attention seekers from other interest groups. If it stays true to the principle of rational, civil discourse in our politics I may go to one of their meetings. If it turns into just another media brand where everyone shows up for publicity for their pet cause, count me out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeckind Donating Member (406 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
28. Ambivalent
I went to the site...first thing I saw was a Coulter ad. So at that point I had some automatic bias.

Looked to be all over the board, definitely not anti-tea. Maybe it had good intentions but it appears to be in the midst of being co-opted by the right wing.

Didn't see a strong set of principles so that I could make a decision one way or the other.

Lastly, I don't care for facebook or any of the other sites like that. Maybe it's my security background but... I found it difficult to go in and wander around without "signing up". Made me feel like one of those "special drawing" thingies you get at the bottom of the Home Depot receipt.

Then again I might be wrong...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
30. Movements named after Beverages are silly nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
49. No "Beerr Bong" Party for you, eh?
I myself was born a Jello Shot man, and will die one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #49
51. I was part of that movement 11 years ago, I called it my Fraternity days nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherLove Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
31. It’s been interesting to watch the absolute hate the Tea Baggers have leveled at them
It’s been interesting to watch the absolute hate the Tea Baggers have leveled at them on the different mediums.

I’ve seem some really evil stuff by the Tea Baggers from fake ids/accounts pretending to be coffee party reps to flooding message boards with mis-information campaigns about them. Followed by fake outrage against anyone who points out the lies.

The Coffee Party is a massive threat to the Tea Baggers. This is a good thing for America.

Progressive Solders need to fly their wing to help them get started, they need some protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. This is 1984 horseshit
Middle class people divided into breakfast beverages arguing over nonsense while the country is looted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scarletwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #32
63. "Middle class people divided into breakfast beverages arguing over nonsense while the country...
Edited on Sat Mar-13-10 10:49 PM by scarletwoman
is looted."

Exactly! Well (and humorously) said. "breakfast beverages" -- *snarf*

sw
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roseBudd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #31
59. The Tea Party is afraid the Coffee Party will look sane, unlike the Tea Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
41. I'll take George Washington Coffee over British Tea any day.
Even if the stuff did taste like mud with pencil shavings in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #41
42. I only drink tea, preferably British
and hate coffee.

I'm going to a Coffee Party meetup anyway, but I hate the absurdity of tying coffee to Americanism and depicting tea as un-American. Joke or not, it's absurd and annoying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonathon Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
44. wishy washy with no plan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #44
60. Yes, exactly
I wasted two hours today finding that out.

They want everyone to be nice to each other and have a dialog and get the two parties working together. I want the bad guys to be cast into the outer darkness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JitterbugPerfume Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
46. I view it with a healthy dose of skepticism
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
47. I can't join it
It calls for civil discourse, of which I refuse to comply - especially with the teabaggers on there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
52. Giving them a chance
The folks I have seen interviewed seem like good people. The Right Wing has taken after them with both barrels - another good sign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ima_sinnic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
53. PDA and DFA are already doing things--why do we need another group, splintering progressives
even more?

Besides PDA (Progressive Democrats of America) and DFA (Democracy for America, which spun off of Dean for America) there is also MoveOn, CREDO, Democrats.com, and a bunch of others. I already get e-mails from so many different progressive, truly grassroots organizations, I have no use for another one, esp. one that seems a bit contrived, and ESPECIALLY one named in reaction to a totally ineffectual fake "grassroots" group of total arseholes who don't even know what they're angry about but just doing what other people tell them to do. The aims of the group also seem a bit wishy-washy, not radical enough for me, and if they are a spin-off of OFA, they are just a DLC front group. Rather than forming yet another "citizen" group, people should be trying to bring all the progressive groups together into a solid lobbying and voting coalition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
62. I don't think we need to be dividing ourselves. Sounds like something the repukes
would like us to do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #62
70. We are already being divided. It seems like we might
acknowledge that, and either work for unity, or direct and manage the division so as to ensure the greatest benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #70
80. Or we could try and stick together under a big tent ...for the good of the party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #80
81. I believe I covered that option
by saying "we could work for unity"

But honestly, I'm getting to the point where I am no longer sure that working "for the good of the party" is the best thing for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
64. I think in some ways it's hard to be the party out of power
and in some ways it's hard to be the party IN power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-13-10 11:32 PM
Response to Original message
65. I just joined - and it's amazing how much work I can do now!!!
I almost NEVER sleep and just seem to search for more things to do...

gotta run...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 09:42 AM
Response to Original message
68. It reminds me of George Castanza yelling "The Jerk Store called...they're running out of you!"
Late, a little lame, smacks desperately of "the comeback" that falls short. I mean...the coffee party? Clever names are usually rooted in some other reality-based moniker. Who the hell has ever heard of a coffee party?

I haven't read all the responses here, and I see that it appears to have been addressed, but I don't know why anyone thinks this is any more "legit" or grass roots than the GOP-funded Tea Baggers. The whole thing sounds like just another way to split votes.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
71. Some things concern me about it.
They talk about fiscal responsibility but do not mention proper taxation or the causes of the fiscal mess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
74. I think that if corporate media outlets are willing to talk about it, it's innocuous at best.
Edited on Sun Mar-14-10 11:14 AM by Marr
They would never cover an actual left-wing grassroots campaign. Especially not in it's infancy. Look how they cover big demonstrations that counter the corporate line. Or rather, how they don't cover them.

I heard the woman who organized this thing in an interview, and she really gave me the impression of being some kind of party establishment hack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
75. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC