Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Podesta Responds To Roberts’ ‘Troubling’ Comment With Call For Supreme Court To Be Televised

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 12:21 PM
Original message
Podesta Responds To Roberts’ ‘Troubling’ Comment With Call For Supreme Court To Be Televised
http://thinkprogress.org/2010/03/14/podesta-supreme-court/

At the State of the Union earlier this year, President Obama denounced the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling that invalidated a sixty-three year-old ban on corporate money in federal elections as the members of the court looked on. “I don’t think American elections should be bankrolled by America’s most powerful interests or, worse, by foreign entities,” said Obama. “They should be decided by the American people.”

At the University of Alabama this week, Chief Justice John Roberts called the scene at the State of the Union “very troubling.” “To the extent the State of the Union has degenerated into a political pep rally, I’m not sure why we’re there,” said Roberts. On Fox News Sunday today, Center for American Progress President and CEO John Podesta said Roberts’ complaint was “a little disingenuous” and suggested that the Supreme Court open its hearings to television cameras:

PODESTA: Well, look, I think it’s a little disingenuous. I don’t think Justice Roberts, Chief Justice Roberts, felt too bad when he was at President Bush’s pep rallies. But I would actually offer him a compromise, which is the Supreme Court stop going to the State of the Union and in exchange they start broadcasting, on C-SPAN or otherwise, their decisions. So that when they issue a decision reversing a hundred years of precedent, let all this corporate money flow into the political system, do it on television so the American people can see it.

(end snip)

video at the link.

Not that the thuglicans would watch. They would wait for Mooseburger Sarah to interpret for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Fox actually had somebody from the Center for American Progress on their show?
I'm impressed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Televising the Supreme Court would be cheap, because Thomas wouldn't need to be mic'ed.
Edited on Sun Mar-14-10 12:56 PM by Ian David
But then again, they'd need someone to occasionally bleep Scalia.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They could just put a carboard cut-out in his chair and no one would know the difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. USSC cannot afford to be televised. It would open up what they do
and how they do it to the general public, and that would doom the neocon catholic cabal on the bench.

Much like a light causes cockroaches to scatter from the kitchen, or congressmen to retire when their crimes are exposed, the Robes really do not want any public scrutiny.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC