Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NSA Gets Award For "E-mail Preservation-LIFETIME FAILURE" Even The “PRINT & FILE” System Failed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 09:54 PM
Original message
NSA Gets Award For "E-mail Preservation-LIFETIME FAILURE" Even The “PRINT & FILE” System Failed
Edited on Sun Mar-14-10 10:04 PM by kpete


"National Security Archive announces Rosemary Award"


By Al Kamen
The Washington Post
March 12, 2010


2010 Rosemary Award for Worst Open Government Performance Goes to Federal Chief Information Officers' Council

National Security Archive cites CIO Council for "lifetime failure"
To address crisis in government e-mail preservation

Disappearance of John Yoo e-mail shows CIOs missing in action;
Latest debacle in two decades of red flags over saving official e-mail


,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

Washington, DC, March 12, 2010 - The Rosemary Award for worst open government performance, named after President Nixon’s secretary who erased 18 ½ minutes of a crucial Watergate tape, this year goes to the Federal Chief Information Officers Council, the senior federal officials (responsible for $71 billion a year of IT purchases) who have never addressed the failure of the government to save its e-mail electronically, according to the citation today by the National Security Archive (www.nsarchive.org).

Formed by Executive Order in 1996 and codified in law by Congress in the 2002 E-Government Act, the CIO Council describes itself as the “principle interagency forum for improving practices in the design, modernization, use, operation, sharing, and performance of Federal Government information resources.” Yet neither the Council’s founding documents, its 2007-2009 strategic plan, its transition memo for the Obama administration, nor its current Web site even mention the challenge of electronic records management for e-mail.

Last month, the Justice Department investigation of former senior officials John Yoo and Jay Bybee over their authorship of the so-called “torture memos” revealed that “most of Yoo’s email records had been deleted and were not recoverable.” The Yoo deletions represent only the latest red flag about government e-mail preservation – dating back to the January 1989 attempt by the Reagan administration to destroy its e-mail backup tapes, thwarted by the National Security Archive’s lawsuit.

A 2008 survey by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington and OpenTheGovernment.org did not find a single federal agency policy that mandates an electronic record keeping system agency-wide. Congressional testimony in 2008 by the Government Accountability Office indicted the standard “print and file” approach by pointing out: “agencies recognize that devoting significant resources to creating paper records from electronic sources is not a viable long-term strategy”; yet GAO concluded even the “print and file” system was failing to capture the historic records “for about half of the senior officials” checked – John Yoo’s peers.

MORE:
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20100312/index.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. 18 1/2 minutes of Nixon's history erased: Major scandal. 18 million BushCo eMails missing....
...and no one even blinks an eye.

That whole "rule of law" thing is OVER, folks.
You're a damned FOOL if you think it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 03:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. Funny, I seem to remember that being rather a major scandal
But hey, hyperbole is fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thecrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. Remember that shredder truck parked outside Darth's house?
Down the memory hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 03:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Yep.. they don't even TRY to hide things


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comtec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:52 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. interesting pic... what's it from?
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. a washington post article, I think
Edited on Mon Mar-15-10 05:15 AM by SoCalDem
The truck was at Cheney's house either right before the election or shortly after.. I'll try to find the article


here's a reference story
http://www.reefland.com/forum/anything-but-reefkeeping/23075-federal-contracts-paper-shredding-services.html
Mid-Atlantic Shredding Services truck making its way up to the Cheney compound at the Naval Observatory in October 2006. Mid-Atlantic was hired by the Secret Service to assist the Vice President in his record-not-keeping needs. That was right about the time that Cheney ordered the Secret Service to destroy all logs and records pertaining to his contacts.


and a link from findlaw.com

http://writ.news.findlaw.com/dean/20070629.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Of course it was a failure,
It was designed to be. You don't expect the government, any government, to actually keep records of it more despicable activities do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-14-10 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. "oopsie"
Edited on Sun Mar-14-10 11:55 PM by upi402
"darnit gee golly, now where is that?"
I want to know; who didn't know what, and WHEN didn't they know it!?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RationalAltruism Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 01:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. This is why they need to make multiple backups sent to independent parties frequently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. "Rosemary Awards" -- I like it. But why am I only the 4th Rec? Surely some of us remember her ...
... very well indeed.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:09 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I just cast the 7th 'rec'!
I well recall that iconic photo, but only as a B&W newspaper illustration.Had it been "colorized" for this occasion? And if so, WHY?

That "eighteen minute gap" phrase, instantly brings to mind that entire Nixon Era. Yeah, I'm 'dating' myself!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm sure the original pic was in color, but papers only used b/w except for the Sunday funnies...
... or mostly, anyway. I don't remember when the big changeover was, but I do remember that my paper ballyhooed it on the front page.

Dang, I'm old, too. ;-)

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quantess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC