Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nancy Pelosi Public Option Ad Hits Her In DC and San Francisco

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 03:30 PM
Original message
Nancy Pelosi Public Option Ad Hits Her In DC and San Francisco
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said on Friday that the final health care bill will not include a public option, claiming that the blame belongs to the upper chamber because "they don't have the votes."

It doesn't appear that simple. A HuffPost analysis of Senate commitments indicates that there would be at least 50 votes for a reconciliation package in the Senate that includes a public option. The administration, however, has shown very little interest in a public option, and as pro-life, pro-public option Democrats abandon the bill in the House, Pelosi struggles to find the needed votes in her own chamber.

A new ad being broadcast in San Francisco -- Pelosi's district -- and Washington, D.C., calls on the House Speaker to make one final push, putting responsibility for the public option squarely in her hands. The organizations behind the ad, the Progressive Change Campaign Committee,, Democracy for America and Credo Action, plan a $75,000 ad buy, co-founder Adam Green said.


Video of Ad at link: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/03/15/nancy-pelosi-public-optio_n_498874.html

Keep the pressure on. The reconciliation bill is not finalized, yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. K+ R . Good for them . Pressure needs to be applied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes. If we can't move them to include a Public Option we can, at least, make them
look us in the eye while they deny the people who have been expressing their desire for it all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ibegurpard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R
Let's see some pressure applied where it NEEDS to be for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC