Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Progressives Who Don’t Honor Their Pledge: Corporatists In Sheep’s Clothing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:13 PM
Original message
Progressives Who Don’t Honor Their Pledge: Corporatists In Sheep’s Clothing

Last August, progressive groups including MoveOn, DFA and blogs across the country came together to raise over $430,000 for 65 members of Congress who pledged to vote against any health care bill that doesn’t have a public option.

Now every excuse made by the President and Congress for not including a public option has crumbled. MoveOn is demonstrating against Kucinich for keeping that promise, and far from supporting members of Congress who keep that pledge, the unions are threatening them with primaries.

If George Bush had tried to pass a health care bill that was the worst blow to the right to choose since the passage of the Hyde Amendment 35 years ago, liberal groups would be screaming bloody murder.

Instead, the natural fiscal constituency of progressive members of Congress — those who should be backing them up for standing for progressive values — are whipping from the right.









http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/03/15/progressives-who-dont-honor-their-pledge-corporatists-in-sheeps-clothing/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. The kill the bill advocates lost the argument
Edited on Mon Mar-15-10 04:19 PM by ProSense
They need to get used to the backlash.



Moving on to pass the best possible legislation is smart. Kucinich gave up on a single payer vote, now he wants Democrats to give up on reform. Then what?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. hardly...
nice try, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Exactly, Mari.
After all, they made us think that we were electing REAL Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. money talks I guess.
sellouts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Most of them are. The cost of a national campaign is outrageous.
Until we get strict public financing for elections, we will have this problem. The Supreme Court decision just multiplies the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
3. We need progress not ideals.
These gruops know this is a good bill and will do great things for people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. The notion of "progress" is related to one's ideals.
You have to have a goal in mind for progress to exist: otherwise, it's just about getting something done, regardless of its value.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. No, progrss is related to getting improvements passed and usable by the people.
Ideals without deeds are worthless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. "Improvements" are also related to ideals. You have to have a measure of
what is an "improvement" (good) as opposed to a "detriment" (bad). If a piece of legislation is really a detriment, then you can't call it an improvement, and just passing something for the sake of having a "deed" is not an "improvement." It takes ideals to decide what is good and what is bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Yes, this bill is a huge improvement that will bring health care to
more than 30 million people.

Ideal without deeds are nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sheepskins supplied by the Insurance/Pharma lobbyists.
Edited on Mon Mar-15-10 04:26 PM by Tierra_y_Libertad
"It could probably be shown by facts and figures that there is no distinctly native American criminal class except Congress."

"I think I can say, and say with pride, that we have some legislatures that bring in higher prices than any in the world."


Mark Twain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Compassion, Enlightenment, Intelligence... these are what I think of
when I consider what goes into making a Progressive. Unfortunately, that's more theory than practice. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's now a different game.
Fight to put a PO into the House 'fix-it-up' bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. You've got serious mental issues. Grayson a corporatist? MoveOn too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Individualist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Sounds like progressive groups aimed high, then decided they couldn't get it, and want some
progress on HCR even if it is not what they originally wanted. Either that or the Progressive Caucus is just a bunch of sell-outs and I can't hang them out to dry for this decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gimama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. k 'n' r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-15-10 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
17. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC