Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

dear andrea mitchell, your bias is showing.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 12:33 PM
Original message
dear andrea mitchell, your bias is showing.
debbie wasserman-schultz just told andrea that the republicans have used this process 36 times to pass legislation.

andrea said the fact that pelosi brought it up at the last minute proves she's desperate and probably doesn't have the votes......


that damned liberal media

m$nbc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. can you help me out...
i just got online and also turned on the tv and caught the last bit of the interview. is there a name for the process? i can research it from there.

sounds like more flapping by the republicans re: procedure they liked to use. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 'self-executing rule'...not sure it has an actual name
Under this tactic, the House could simultaneously approve the Senate version of the bill while voting on the package of changes. This would "deem" the Senate bill passed, though not directly show members voting in favor of passage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Interesting! I'll have to read up on this
From Rep W-S, the Repubs used it a bunch.

Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. According to MSNBC, Pelosi is having a press conference in this hour
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. i wonder if they will cover it? they gave chris dodd about 90 seconds yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Someone is bound to ask about it since it's the scandal of the day
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. m$nbc is calling it 'deem and pass'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lib2DaBone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. just the thought of Andrea Mitchell in bed with Alan Greenspan...
.. is enough to make me hurl....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Keep telling yourself they have different bedrooms
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. It was pretty bad!
Andrea Mitchell is really into those GOP talking points!
Makes one think she writes them and passes them out
for the GOP to the Press corp.

I'm really more than just a bit tired of this blatant bias shit
that poses as news reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
10. Shre isn't desperate...
She is giving cover to wavering members, if the House goes this way...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChicagoSuz219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
12. Debbie was great... as usual!
It made Andrea seem uninformed about how Congress works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
13. Definition of "Self Executing" Rules plus some examples of how it has been used
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 02:37 PM by eleny
Order Code 98-710 GOV
Updated December 21, 2006

Definition of “Self-Executing” Rule. One of the newer types is called a “selfexecuting”
rule; it embodies a “two-for-one” procedure. This means that when the House
adopts a rule it also simultaneously agrees to dispose of a separate matter, which is
specified in the rule itself. For instance, self-executing rules may stipulate that a discrete
policy proposal is deemed to have passed the House and been incorporated in the bill to
be taken up. The effect: neither in the House nor in the Committee of the Whole will
lawmakers have an opportunity to amend or to vote separately on the “self-executed”
provision. It was automatically agreed to when the House passed the rule. Rules of this
sort contain customary, or “boilerplate,” language, such as: “The amendment printed in
accompanying this resolution] shall be considered as adopted in the House and in the
Committee of the Whole.”

Contemporary Uses are listed here:
http://www.rules.house.gov/Archives/98-710.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC