Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember When Democrats Promised to “Fix” Medicare Part D? Marion Berry (D-AR) Does

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:13 PM
Original message
Remember When Democrats Promised to “Fix” Medicare Part D? Marion Berry (D-AR) Does
That was when the Democrats were out of power.

:(

http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/03/15/remember-when-democrats-promised-to-“fix”-medicare-part-d-marion-berry-d-ar-does/

"...Marion Berry (D-AR) is unlikely vote for the Senate health care bill in the House, but he has recently submitted is own, less comprehensive health care bill (PDF). Primarily, what it does is fix the problems with the Medicare Part D program created by former Republican Rep. Billy Tauzin, which Democrats have been promising to fix for years. That is until President Obama promised now PhRMA lobbyist Billy Tauzin to not fix Medicare Part D as part of health care reform...

The biggest thing the bill does is fix the two most glaring problems with Medicare Part D that Democrats have been demagoging for years. It would allow for drug re-importation and direct Medicare drug price negotiation..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. they will fix it
after nafta, dadt, wmd intel, and the patriot act.. once these get fixed, hcr will get fixed..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. OK, guess it is best to be patient ...
:sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. well
You either are patient or you become a patient.

Wait Management TM is an important part of good living.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Since it is almost spring ...
I'm moving to the Weight Management.

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Also note that if/when the GOP takes Congress again, they'll blow up the Filibuster rule.
Then they can better work toward being a permanent majority.

Well, perhaps they won't have to go that far, our "leadership" has a history of being too pansy-ass to filibuster. :(

We need NEW BLOOD - NEW LEADERS in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. Also some Dems were talking about changing the filibuster rule...
we'll see.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes, lets just not do anything and wait another 20, 40, 60 years to try again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. False premise.
Typical fear-mongering, just like the Wall Street loot-fest.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. the smoking gun could come in the form of a mushroom cloud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. ...With a hearty helping of false dichotomy sauce. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. no, let's put it more corporate perks & wait another 20, 40, 60 years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. The sky is falling, the sky is falling
There is no time for rational intelligent debate. Pass this piece of shit now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. Tell me who wants to do nothing? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
6. K&R #5
(for now)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Thanks, this at a time when boomers are ready to enroll in Medicare...
and when there is talk of entitlement spending being too high.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Oh yes, they are coming for you/us, never doubt it. The enablers here just make me ill.
They already got the tail end of the "greatest generation" (dropping dead in minimum wage jobs in their 70's & 80's cause their pensions were looted) and their kids are on the chopping block now.

But what the hell, we created more billionaires than anybody else, so it was all worth it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #15
20. No doubt in my mind, if they really wanted to help Medicare then they
would have pushed for Medicare to negotiate drug prices.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CTyankee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. "billionaires." So true. Something I hear from young working class guys
is that they don't need social programs, they've got a shot at becoming a billionaire so the system is just fine. That's why they are Republicans or Libertarians. They are convinced of this fantasy. I wonder what they will think on the day they wake up and they are 50 years old, still grinding away and getting worse off every year, probably having developed a beer belly and at risk for diabetes and heart disease and have no decent health care. Sad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
8. It eliminates the doughnut hole. I just heard the Representative from
Florida (Can't remember her name but she's an attractive blond Dem. who recently survived breast cancer). She was on MSNBC revieweing what fixes are in the bill and slamming the Pubs for claiming that the vote they're going to take in the House isn't really a vote and has never been done before. Of course the Pubs are lying AGAIN and the procedure has been used in te past by both parties.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. The Obama HC plan talked of saving 30 billion annually, quite a bit more...
than the amount talked about to close the doughnut hole.

http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/issues/HealthCareFullPlan.pdf

Page 5

"Allow Medicare to negotiate for cheaper drug prices.

The 2003 Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act bans the government from negotiating down the prices of prescription drugs, even though the Department of Veterans Affairs’ negotiation of prescription drug prices with drug companies has garnered significant savings for taxpayers.32 Barack Obama and Joe Biden will repeal the ban on direct negotiation with drug companies and use the resulting savings, which could be as high as $30 billion,33 to further invest in improving health care coverage and quality..."




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. this health care bill does attempt to fix it
It attempts to close the donut hole.

It does not have medicare negotiations or reimportation. Those reforms were actually blocked to avoid pissing off Pharma.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
19. This is what they want everyone to pay attention to instead of the broken
promises.

:shrug:

From a speech just before the election - "Enough is Enough..."

"And we are tired of watching as year after year, candidates offer up detailed health care plans with great fanfare and promise only to see them crushed under the weight of Washington politics and drug and insurance lobbying once the campaign is over.

That is not who we are, that is not who we have to be, enough is enough, it time for us to change."


Newport News - October 2008






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Juche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
24. I know he broke his promises
He ran ads railing against Billy Tauzin and Pharma, then when he gets in teh white house he invites him over a half dozen times. And things like the public option, medicare negotiations and reimportation are blocked because they piss of hospitals, insurance companies and pharma.

Obama is going to have a lot of explaining to do when he runs for reelection. But that doesn't change the fact that this bill is better than doing nothing. Nor does it change the fact that this bill is not the final word in health reform. Even when this bill passes people are still going to work on medicare buy ins, single payer on the state level, new reforms, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. We always hear better than nothing, I do not know anyone who
thinks that nothing should be done.

Why did we take back the WH, the House and Senate to enact an individual mandate to buy a private product?

:(



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
23. The bill completely closes the donut hole
Completely closes donut hole. Replaces $500 increase threshold increase limit with a $250 rebate to Medicare beneficiaries who hit the donut hole in 2010. Closes donut hole by phasing down the coinsurance so it is the standard 25% by 2020 throughout the coverage gap.

link


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Savings as high as 30 billion per year, a bit more than the donut hole
being discussed now.

http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/issues/HealthCareFullPlan.pdf

Page 5

"Allow Medicare to negotiate for cheaper drug prices.

The 2003 Medicare Prescription Drug Improvement and Modernization Act bans the government from negotiating down the prices of prescription drugs, even though the Department of Veterans Affairs’ negotiation of prescription drug prices with drug companies has garnered significant savings for taxpayers.32 Barack Obama and Joe Biden will repeal the ban on direct negotiation with drug companies and use the resulting savings, which could be as high as $30 billion,33 to further invest in improving health care coverage and quality..."



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=385&topic_id=423213&mesg_id=423213

August 21, 2009

Obama's PhRMA deal

"Smith: Obama's strategy was to vilify the drug companies and then cut deals with them in secret..."


SMOLENSKAIA: In his 2008 campaign ads, Obama denounced Billy Tauzin, head of PhRMA, for blocking Medicare from negotiating for lower drug prices. Tauzin, one of cofounders of the House Blue Dogs coalition, crossed over to the Republican side in '95.


BARACK OBAMA, US PRESIDENT: The pharmaceutical industry wrote into the prescription drug plan that Medicare could not negotiate with drug companies. And you know what? The chairman of the committee, who pushed the law through, went to work for the pharmaceutical industry, making $2 million a year.


SMOLENSKAIA: In their last week's article, Los Angeles Times reports that Tauzin said he carefully negotiated his agreements with the White House, offering the $80 billion discount program in return for assurances that there would be no government price-setting in Medicare Part D, Medicare prescription drug coverage for seniors.


SMITH: They talk about they're going to hold costs down, maybe they're going to shave off a few billion dollars here over the next ten years and a billion dollars there. But that's a drop in the bucket in comparison to what they will gain by having a purchase-insurance mandate that would make every American citizen purchase coverage that would allow them to buy the drugs that big pharma will not be required to negotiate any bulk pricing for or any lower pricing for anyone. So it's a huge windfall for them that if health-care reform passes. With all of us purchasing coverage through private insurance and bringing those dollars in to buy pharmaceuticals, it's a huge, huge benefit to them.


SMOLENSKAIA: According to Los Angeles Times, Tauzin also said the industry asked the administration not to allow the import of cheaper drugs, because of safety concerns..."






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillbillyBob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. REimportation of drugs , ones that were made here.
Frankly I don't see how these folks could say that with a straight face. Since you see all those drug adds(we should end that too!) that rattle off a list of things that could go wrong.

I am a long term hiv/aids patient and in the 2%..the 2% that has serious bad reactions some times requiring a trip to the ER.
Fortunately I and my partner have enough experience and have bee kit and benedryl on hand and can direct the staff in the ER what to do and to be stern enough to make them listen.

We deserve so much better from our government, and the pharmas that make so much profit off our our misery
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. So true about deserving better from our government, it is maddening
to watch them go back on promises once they have gained office.

And how do all these other governments provide lower cost drugs, doubt they have those pesky commercials.

:)





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. This comment makes no sense.
The overall savings including the deal is well above $100 billion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-16-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. So that is 100 billion per year??? The Obama plan called for 300 billion
Edited on Tue Mar-16-10 10:54 PM by slipslidingaway
if you look over a decade, somehow I doubt the deal is 100 billion a year, so it must work out to 10 billion a year.

A third of the original plan.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-17-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Is that 100 billion per year? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC